DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.s.singh@gmail.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_hash thread safe
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:03:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258AEA5206E@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0801MB1930FFADF298642955D8216698880@HE1PR0801MB1930.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>



> 
> A gentle reminder,
> 
> I am curious to know if/how rte_hash is thread safe for lookups.It is not obvious to me how following code is thread safe:

I don't think it is really thread-safe: you can't do lookup and add/delete simultaneously from different threads.
Some extra synchronization would be needed.
Konstantin

> 
> _rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
> 
>                                         hash_sig_t sig, void **data)
> 
> {
> 
> 
> 
> …
> 
>                         if (rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h) == 0) {
> 
>                                 if (data != NULL)
> 
>                                         *data = k->pdata;
> 
> }
> 
> a key could be deleted and another key inserted in its slot while the lookup is happening. For example, in the following sequence of events:
> The slot has Key1,V1
> Lookup Thread T1 compares the input key to Key1 and it matches. The thread gets context switched out Thread T2 deletes Key1.
> Thread T2 inserts Key2 with value V2.
> T1 reads the data from the slot and returns V2. This is incorrect.
> 
> If T1 is a worker/data plane thread, which is supposed to be pinned to the CPU, is it required to consider the case of T1 getting pre-empted?
> 
> However, this case can exist with T1 not getting pre-empted. i.e. Key1 can get deleted by thread T2 while T1 is doing the comparison.
> 
> In this case, 'k' is a memory pointer pointing to an array element. The memory itself is not freed. The code will still return the data
> associated with Key1 - assuming Key2 belongs to a different slot ID. But, it is possible that 'data' may not be valid anymore since it is owned
> by the application.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Brijesh
> 
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:12 PM, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.s.singh@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I  want to use DPDK's rte_hash library to keep track of tcp flows. The
> > lookups will be done by multiple threads but inserts will be done only
> > on one thread.
> >
> > As per the documentation rte_hash library has thread safe lookups. Key
> > /data inserts should be done on single thread, since those operations
> > are not thread safe. Is this documentation still correct?
> >
> > The lookup code compares the key and returns the data if the key
> > matches, this doesn't look like thread safe. Am I missing something?
> >
> > _rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
> >
> >                                         hash_sig_t sig, void **data)
> >
> > {
> >
> >
> >
> > …
> >
> >                         if (rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h) == 0) {
> >
> >                                 if (data != NULL)
> >
> >                                         *data = k->pdata;
> >
> > }
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brijesh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-12  4:12 Brijesh Singh
2018-04-23 19:40 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-04-23 23:50   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-24  0:21     ` Jim Murphy
2018-04-24  0:30       ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-24  0:48         ` Jim Murphy
2018-04-24  1:14           ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-24  2:13             ` Jim Murphy
2018-04-24  6:36               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-04-24 15:04             ` Brijesh Singh
2018-04-25  6:45               ` Shyam Shrivastav
2018-04-24  3:48           ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-24  5:02             ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-24  6:12   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-04-24 11:03     ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2018-04-24 11:07       ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-24 17:35 ` Wang, Yipeng1

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258AEA5206E@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=brijesh.s.singh@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).