From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix Tx fn selection when using new ethdev offloads
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 13:24:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258AEDC0D90@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180501130309.39444-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Hi Bruce,
>
> The Tx function selection code in the driver only used the older txq
> flags values to check whether the scalar or vector functions should be
> used. This caused performance regressions with testpmd io-fwd as the
> scalar path rather than the vector one was being used in the default
> case. Fix this by changing the code to take account of new offloads and
> deleting the defines used for the old ones.
>
> Fixes: 7497d3e2f777 ("net/i40e: convert to new Tx offloads API")
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> index ec1ce54ca..c523af575 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -40,9 +40,6 @@
> /* Base address of the HW descriptor ring should be 128B aligned. */
> #define I40E_RING_BASE_ALIGN 128
>
> -#define I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS ((uint32_t)ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS | \
> - ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS)
> -
> #define I40E_TXD_CMD (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS)
>
> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588
> @@ -70,6 +67,12 @@
> #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
> (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
>
> +static const uint64_t i40e_simple_ol_mask = (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM);
> +
Seems incomplete.
>From i40e_ethdev.c full-featured tx supports:
dev_info->tx_offload_capa =
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_QINQ_INSERT |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO;
So we probably need the same here plus multiseg.
BTW, it is really strange that we don't have multiseg in tx_offload_capa.
Should be present I think.
Might be worse to create a new define for it, or just use dev_info->tx_offload_capa directly.
Konstantin
> static inline void
> i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp)
> {
> @@ -2108,11 +2111,9 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup_runtime(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> dev->data->nb_tx_queues)) {
> /**
> * If it is the first queue to setup,
> - * set all flags to default and call
> + * set all flags and call
> * i40e_set_tx_function.
> */
> - ad->tx_simple_allowed = true;
> - ad->tx_vec_allowed = true;
> i40e_set_tx_function_flag(dev, txq);
> i40e_set_tx_function(dev);
> return 0;
> @@ -2128,9 +2129,8 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup_runtime(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> }
> /* check simple tx conflict */
> if (ad->tx_simple_allowed) {
> - if (((txq->txq_flags & I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) !=
> - I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) ||
> - txq->tx_rs_thresh < RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST) {
> + if ((txq->offloads & i40e_simple_ol_mask) != 0 ||
> + txq->tx_rs_thresh < RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST) {
> PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "No-simple tx is required.");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -3080,18 +3080,21 @@ i40e_set_tx_function_flag(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
> I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev->data->dev_private);
>
> /* Use a simple Tx queue (no offloads, no multi segs) if possible */
> - if (((txq->txq_flags & I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) == I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS)
> - && (txq->tx_rs_thresh >= RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST)) {
> - if (txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ) {
> - PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector tx"
> - " can be enabled on this txq.");
> -
> - } else {
> - ad->tx_vec_allowed = false;
> - }
> - } else {
> - ad->tx_simple_allowed = false;
> - }
> + ad->tx_simple_allowed = ((txq->offloads & i40e_simple_ol_mask) == 0 &&
> + txq->tx_rs_thresh >= RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST);
> + ad->tx_vec_allowed = (ad->tx_simple_allowed &&
> + txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ);
> +
> + if (ad->tx_vec_allowed)
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector Tx can be enabled on Tx queue %u.",
> + txq->queue_id);
> + else if (ad->tx_simple_allowed)
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Simple Tx can be enabled on Tx queue %u.",
> + txq->queue_id);
> + else
> + PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> + "Neither simple nor vector Tx enabled on Tx queue %u\n",
> + txq->queue_id);
> }
>
> void __attribute__((cold))
> --
> 2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-01 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-01 13:03 Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 13:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2018-05-01 13:28 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 13:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:11 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-05-01 14:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:16 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-01 15:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-01 17:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-05-02 8:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-02 8:30 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258AEDC0D90@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).