DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Tx fn selection when using new ethdev offloads
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 17:52:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258AEDC109B@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180501141354.13935-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 3:14 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Richardson,
> Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix Tx fn selection when using new ethdev offloads
> 
> The Tx function selection code in the driver only used the older txq
> flags values to check whether the scalar or vector functions should be
> used. This caused performance regressions with testpmd io-fwd as the
> scalar path rather than the vector one was being used in the default
> case. Fix this by changing the code to take account of new offloads and
> deleting the defines used for the old ones.
> 
> Fixes: 7497d3e2f777 ("net/i40e: convert to new Tx offloads API")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> index ec1ce54ca..006f5b846 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -40,9 +40,6 @@
>  /* Base address of the HW descriptor ring should be 128B aligned. */
>  #define I40E_RING_BASE_ALIGN	128
> 
> -#define I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS ((uint32_t)ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS | \
> -					ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS)
> -
>  #define I40E_TXD_CMD (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS)
> 
>  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588
> @@ -2108,11 +2105,9 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup_runtime(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>  				 dev->data->nb_tx_queues)) {
>  		/**
>  		 * If it is the first queue to setup,
> -		 * set all flags to default and call
> +		 * set all flags and call
>  		 * i40e_set_tx_function.
>  		 */
> -		ad->tx_simple_allowed = true;
> -		ad->tx_vec_allowed = true;
>  		i40e_set_tx_function_flag(dev, txq);
>  		i40e_set_tx_function(dev);
>  		return 0;
> @@ -2128,9 +2123,8 @@ i40e_dev_tx_queue_setup_runtime(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>  	}
>  	/* check simple tx conflict */
>  	if (ad->tx_simple_allowed) {
> -		if (((txq->txq_flags & I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) !=
> -		     I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) ||
> -		    txq->tx_rs_thresh < RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST) {
> +		if (txq->offloads != 0 ||
> +				txq->tx_rs_thresh < RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST) {
>  			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "No-simple tx is required.");
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> @@ -3080,18 +3074,21 @@ i40e_set_tx_function_flag(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
>  		I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev->data->dev_private);
> 
>  	/* Use a simple Tx queue (no offloads, no multi segs) if possible */
> -	if (((txq->txq_flags & I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS) == I40E_SIMPLE_FLAGS)
> -			&& (txq->tx_rs_thresh >= RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST)) {
> -		if (txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ) {
> -			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector tx"
> -				     " can be enabled on this txq.");
> -
> -		} else {
> -			ad->tx_vec_allowed = false;
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		ad->tx_simple_allowed = false;
> -	}
> +	ad->tx_simple_allowed = (txq->offloads == 0 &&
> +			txq->tx_rs_thresh >= RTE_PMD_I40E_TX_MAX_BURST);

Actually after another thought - who setup txq->offloads?
I did a quick scan, through i40e code and seems no one does.
So now it seems not possible to enable TX offloads at all.
Konstantin

BTW, seems like rxq->offloads are not properly initialised too.

> +	ad->tx_vec_allowed = (ad->tx_simple_allowed &&
> +			txq->tx_rs_thresh <= RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ);
> +
> +	if (ad->tx_vec_allowed)
> +		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector Tx can be enabled on Tx queue %u.",
> +				txq->queue_id);
> +	else if (ad->tx_simple_allowed)
> +		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Simple Tx can be enabled on Tx queue %u.",
> +				txq->queue_id);
> +	else
> +		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> +				"Neither simple nor vector Tx enabled on Tx queue %u\n",
> +				txq->queue_id);
>  }
> 
>  void __attribute__((cold))
> --
> 2.14.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-01 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-01 13:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 13:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-05-01 13:28   ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 13:52   ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:11     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-05-01 14:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:16   ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-01 14:37     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-01 15:48       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-01 17:52   ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2018-05-02  8:24     ` Bruce Richardson
2018-05-02  8:30       ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258AEDC109B@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).