From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Alex Kiselev <alex@therouter.net>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] librte_ip_frag: add function to delete expired entries
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 13:28:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258C0C398D2@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79375b5b-5429-482e-bf87-fa2d7b811527@orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com>
>
> A fragmented packets is supposed to live no longer than max_cycles,
> but the lib deletes an expired packet only occasionally when it scans
> a bucket to find an empty slot while adding a new packet.
> Therefore a fragment might sit in the table forever.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Kiselev <alex@therouter.net>
> ---
> lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c | 18 ------------------
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_version.map | 6 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
> index 197acf8d8..0fdcc7d0f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@
> #define IPv6_KEY_BYTES_FMT \
> "%08" PRIx64 "%08" PRIx64 "%08" PRIx64 "%08" PRIx64
>
> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT
> +#define IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT_UPDATE(s, f, v) ((s)->f += (v))
> +#else
> +#define IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT_UPDATE(s, f, v) do {} while (0)
> +#endif /* IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT */
> +
> /* internal functions declarations */
> struct rte_mbuf * ip_frag_process(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp,
> struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr, struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> @@ -149,4 +155,16 @@ ip_frag_reset(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, uint64_t tms)
> fp->frags[IP_FIRST_FRAG_IDX] = zero_frag;
> }
>
> +/* local frag table helper functions */
> +static inline void
> +ip_frag_tbl_del(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> + struct ip_frag_pkt *fp)
> +{
> + ip_frag_free(fp, dr);
> + ip_frag_key_invalidate(&fp->key);
> + TAILQ_REMOVE(&tbl->lru, fp, lru);
> + tbl->use_entries--;
> + IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT_UPDATE(&tbl->stat, del_num, 1);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _IP_FRAG_COMMON_H_ */
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
> index 2560c7713..97470a872 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
> @@ -14,24 +14,6 @@
> #define IP_FRAG_TBL_POS(tbl, sig) \
> ((tbl)->pkt + ((sig) & (tbl)->entry_mask))
>
> -#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT
> -#define IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT_UPDATE(s, f, v) ((s)->f += (v))
> -#else
> -#define IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT_UPDATE(s, f, v) do {} while (0)
> -#endif /* IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT */
> -
> -/* local frag table helper functions */
> -static inline void
> -ip_frag_tbl_del(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> - struct ip_frag_pkt *fp)
> -{
> - ip_frag_free(fp, dr);
> - ip_frag_key_invalidate(&fp->key);
> - TAILQ_REMOVE(&tbl->lru, fp, lru);
> - tbl->use_entries--;
> - IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT_UPDATE(&tbl->stat, del_num, 1);
> -}
> -
> static inline void
> ip_frag_tbl_add(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl, struct ip_frag_pkt *fp,
> const struct ip_frag_key *key, uint64_t tms)
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> index b3f3f78df..7f425f610 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> @@ -65,10 +65,13 @@ struct ip_frag_pkt {
>
> #define IP_FRAG_DEATH_ROW_LEN 32 /**< death row size (in packets) */
>
> +/* death row size in mbufs */
> +#define IP_FRAG_DEATH_ROW_MBUF_LEN (IP_FRAG_DEATH_ROW_LEN * (IP_MAX_FRAG_NUM + 1))
> +
> /** mbuf death row (packets to be freed) */
> struct rte_ip_frag_death_row {
> uint32_t cnt; /**< number of mbufs currently on death row */
> - struct rte_mbuf *row[IP_FRAG_DEATH_ROW_LEN * (IP_MAX_FRAG_NUM + 1)];
> + struct rte_mbuf *row[IP_FRAG_DEATH_ROW_MBUF_LEN];
> /**< mbufs to be freed */
> };
>
> @@ -325,6 +328,20 @@ void rte_ip_frag_free_death_row(struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> void
> rte_ip_frag_table_statistics_dump(FILE * f, const struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl);
>
> +/**
> + * Delete expired fragments
> + *
> + * @param tbl
> + * Table to delete expired fragments from
> + * @param dr
> + * Death row to free buffers to
> + * @param tms
> + * Current timestamp
> + */
> +void __rte_experimental
> +rte_frag_table_del_expired_entries(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
> + struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr, uint64_t tms);
> +
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c
> index 659a17951..a23f6f24f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c
> @@ -121,3 +121,24 @@ rte_ip_frag_table_statistics_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl)
> fail_nospace,
> fail_total - fail_nospace);
> }
> +
> +/* Delete expired fragments */
> +void __rte_experimental
> +rte_frag_table_del_expired_entries(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
> + struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr, uint64_t tms)
> +{
> + uint64_t max_cycles;
> + struct ip_frag_pkt *fp;
> +
> + max_cycles = tbl->max_cycles;
> +
> + TAILQ_FOREACH(fp, &tbl->lru, lru)
> + if (max_cycles + fp->start < tms) {
> + /* check that death row has enough space */
> + if (IP_FRAG_DEATH_ROW_MBUF_LEN - dr->cnt >= fp->last_idx)
Just as a nit: s/ IP_FRAG_DEATH_ROW_MBUF_LEN/RTE_DIM(dr->row).
Apart from that - looks good.
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-08 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <79375b5b-5429-482e-bf87-fa2d7b811527@orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-06-08 13:28 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2018-06-29 16:37 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-08-24 11:34 Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-09-19 17:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-04 10:13 Alex Kiselev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258C0C398D2@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=alex@therouter.net \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).