From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Alex Kiselev <alex@therouter.net>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] librte_ip_frag: add mbuf counter
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:38:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258C0C44FE9@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdf25067-f7c2-4e04-a850-af9fb2ae0f2f@orsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Alex,
> There might be situations (kind of attack when a lot of
> fragmented packets are sent to a dpdk application in order
> to flood the fragmentation table) when no additional mbufs
> must be added to the fragmentations table since it already
> contains to many of them. Currently there is no way to
> determine the number of mbufs holded int the fragmentation
> table. This patch allows to keep track of the number of mbufs
> holded in the fragmentation table.
I understand your intention, but still not sure it is worth it.
My thought was that you can estimate by upper limit (num_entries * entries_per_bucket) or so.
Probably another way to account number of mbufs without changes in the lib -
apply something like that(assuming that your fragmets are not multisegs):
uint32_t mbuf_in_frag_table = 0;
....
n= dr->cnt;
mb = rte_ipv4_frag_reassemble_packet(...);
if (mb != NULL)
mbuf_in_frag_table += mb->nb_segs;
mbuf_in_frag_table += dr->cnt - n + 1;
In theory that could be applied even if fragments might be multisegs, but for that,
we'll need to change rte_ip_frag_free_death_row() to return total number of freed segments.
Konstantin
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Kiselev <alex@therouter.net>
> ---
> lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h | 16 +++++++++-------
> lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c | 1 +
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_version.map | 1 +
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c | 2 +-
> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
> index 0fdcc7d0f..9fe5c0559 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_common.h
> @@ -32,15 +32,15 @@
> #endif /* IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT */
>
> /* internal functions declarations */
> -struct rte_mbuf * ip_frag_process(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp,
> - struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr, struct rte_mbuf *mb,
> - uint16_t ofs, uint16_t len, uint16_t more_frags);
> +struct rte_mbuf *ip_frag_process(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
> + struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> + struct rte_mbuf *mb, uint16_t ofs, uint16_t len, uint16_t more_frags);
>
> -struct ip_frag_pkt * ip_frag_find(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
> +struct ip_frag_pkt *ip_frag_find(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
> struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> const struct ip_frag_key *key, uint64_t tms);
>
> -struct ip_frag_pkt * ip_frag_lookup(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
> +struct ip_frag_pkt *ip_frag_lookup(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
> const struct ip_frag_key *key, uint64_t tms,
> struct ip_frag_pkt **free, struct ip_frag_pkt **stale);
>
> @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ ip_frag_key_cmp(const struct ip_frag_key * k1, const struct ip_frag_key * k2)
>
> /* put fragment on death row */
> static inline void
> -ip_frag_free(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr)
> +ip_frag_free(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl, struct ip_frag_pkt *fp,
> + struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr)
> {
> uint32_t i, k;
>
> @@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ ip_frag_free(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr)
> if (fp->frags[i].mb != NULL) {
> dr->row[k++] = fp->frags[i].mb;
> fp->frags[i].mb = NULL;
> + tbl->nb_mbufs--;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -160,7 +162,7 @@ static inline void
> ip_frag_tbl_del(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> struct ip_frag_pkt *fp)
> {
> - ip_frag_free(fp, dr);
> + ip_frag_free(tbl, fp, dr);
> ip_frag_key_invalidate(&fp->key);
> TAILQ_REMOVE(&tbl->lru, fp, lru);
> tbl->use_entries--;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
> index 97470a872..4c47d3fb4 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/ip_frag_internal.c
> @@ -29,14 +29,13 @@ static inline void
> ip_frag_tbl_reuse(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, uint64_t tms)
> {
> - ip_frag_free(fp, dr);
> + ip_frag_free(tbl, fp, dr);
> ip_frag_reset(fp, tms);
> TAILQ_REMOVE(&tbl->lru, fp, lru);
> TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&tbl->lru, fp, lru);
> IP_FRAG_TBL_STAT_UPDATE(&tbl->stat, reuse_num, 1);
> }
>
> -
> static inline void
> ipv4_frag_hash(const struct ip_frag_key *key, uint32_t *v1, uint32_t *v2)
> {
> @@ -88,8 +87,9 @@ ipv6_frag_hash(const struct ip_frag_key *key, uint32_t *v1, uint32_t *v2)
> }
>
> struct rte_mbuf *
> -ip_frag_process(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> - struct rte_mbuf *mb, uint16_t ofs, uint16_t len, uint16_t more_frags)
> +ip_frag_process(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl, struct ip_frag_pkt *fp,
> + struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr, struct rte_mbuf *mb, uint16_t ofs,
> + uint16_t len, uint16_t more_frags)
> {
> uint32_t idx;
>
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ ip_frag_process(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> fp->frags[IP_LAST_FRAG_IDX].len);
>
> /* free all fragments, invalidate the entry. */
> - ip_frag_free(fp, dr);
> + ip_frag_free(tbl, fp, dr);
> ip_frag_key_invalidate(&fp->key);
> IP_FRAG_MBUF2DR(dr, mb);
>
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ ip_frag_process(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> fp->frags[idx].ofs = ofs;
> fp->frags[idx].len = len;
> fp->frags[idx].mb = mb;
> + tbl->nb_mbufs++;
>
> mb = NULL;
>
> @@ -205,8 +206,9 @@ ip_frag_process(struct ip_frag_pkt *fp, struct rte_ip_frag_death_row *dr,
> fp->frags[IP_LAST_FRAG_IDX].len);
>
> /* free associated resources. */
> - ip_frag_free(fp, dr);
> - }
> + ip_frag_free(tbl, fp, dr);
> + } else
> + tbl->nb_mbufs -= fp->last_idx;
>
> /* we are done with that entry, invalidate it. */
> ip_frag_key_invalidate(&fp->key);
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> index 7f425f610..623934d87 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct rte_ip_frag_tbl {
> uint32_t bucket_entries; /**< hash associativity. */
> uint32_t nb_entries; /**< total size of the table. */
> uint32_t nb_buckets; /**< num of associativity lines. */
> + uint32_t nb_mbufs; /**< num of mbufs holded in the tbl. */
> struct ip_frag_pkt *last; /**< last used entry. */
> struct ip_pkt_list lru; /**< LRU list for table entries. */
> struct ip_frag_tbl_stat stat; /**< statistics counters. */
> @@ -329,8 +330,23 @@ void
> rte_ip_frag_table_statistics_dump(FILE * f, const struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl);
>
> /**
> - * Delete expired fragments
> + * Number of mbufs holded in the fragmentation table.
> + *
> + * @param tbl
> + * Fragmentation table
> *
> + * @return
> + * Number of mbufs holded in the fragmentation table.
> + */
> +static inline uint32_t __rte_experimental
> +rte_frag_table_mbuf_count(const struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl)
> +{
> + return tbl->nb_mbufs;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Delete expired fragments
> + *
> * @param tbl
> * Table to delete expired fragments from
> * @param dr
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c
> index a23f6f24f..46c2df84a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_common.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ rte_ip_frag_table_create(uint32_t bucket_num, uint32_t bucket_entries,
> tbl->nb_buckets = bucket_num;
> tbl->bucket_entries = bucket_entries;
> tbl->entry_mask = (tbl->nb_entries - 1) & ~(tbl->bucket_entries - 1);
> + tbl->nb_mbufs = 0;
>
> TAILQ_INIT(&(tbl->lru));
> return tbl;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_version.map b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_version.map
> index d40d5515f..f4700f460 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag_version.map
> @@ -23,4 +23,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> global:
>
> rte_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
> + rte_frag_table_mbuf_count;
> };
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
> index 4956b99ea..fbdfd860a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ rte_ipv4_frag_reassemble_packet(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
>
>
> /* process the fragmented packet. */
> - mb = ip_frag_process(fp, dr, mb, ip_ofs, ip_len, ip_flag);
> + mb = ip_frag_process(tbl, fp, dr, mb, ip_ofs, ip_len, ip_flag);
> ip_frag_inuse(tbl, fp);
>
> IP_FRAG_LOG(DEBUG, "%s:%d:\n"
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> index db249fe60..dda5a57b7 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ rte_ipv6_frag_reassemble_packet(struct rte_ip_frag_tbl *tbl,
>
>
> /* process the fragmented packet. */
> - mb = ip_frag_process(fp, dr, mb, ip_ofs, ip_len,
> + mb = ip_frag_process(tbl, fp, dr, mb, ip_ofs, ip_len,
> MORE_FRAGS(frag_hdr->frag_data));
> ip_frag_inuse(tbl, fp);
>
> --
> 2.16.1.windows.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-29 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bdf25067-f7c2-4e04-a850-af9fb2ae0f2f@orsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-06-29 16:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2018-06-29 17:46 ` Alex Kiselev
2018-07-17 14:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-07-18 7:33 ` Alex Kiselev
2018-08-22 9:47 ` Alex Kiselev
2018-08-24 12:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-06-04 10:13 Alex Kiselev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258C0C44FE9@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=alex@therouter.net \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).