From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f169.google.com (mail-wj0-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3255CF94A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:38:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v7so150000871wjy.2 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:38:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4r4xy/6pnB2728UEsftHoLT9+fLOpzap25dyKDqEjOM=; b=aOZNiN46jLq61aGfzVABDq7z2dFA9CGCzzDObrhw5pfFw8fWpNcMssqDOaco9AaLDL dOuerXaufFhZFmH+oi6N7TkL6wECmoG4duIH3W6qHmH5UTJG6fVP9pa+7WdtSOnS+X7h QAmovwBZ7Mtdt3B+iaj9/oGFb6IL1ZtreT+V/nVkUiKJUOWoTC3GVxFQMHm49+7P7zb+ j1aaPbTyOGFuTZnUa8MRIFm+P24rMU1FYH25WoHm1KCVxfutI7gIS1PyD1xSyrgHFRvb +kXBF6b47piJv+YjmgnwecliRVvSFsNnVdCB44uxH3j5hHouVbqQ33CL2PH1RbvJ43Il o1XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4r4xy/6pnB2728UEsftHoLT9+fLOpzap25dyKDqEjOM=; b=fTsHHroOQHuPseImMJ2XquonF+b2rULrToPwQ/myeiw6QPU627KBYYVWMPkqu3D4JB 5OfiDcdDDVZE8sSYTfZRJ+/WIy15tTveaRH87QTqRzn6HzrpIbVpGLwzFOEuCrHTD7zJ zdc02P5/BRfcIUWVZYT0CkEGoljfrM5IICZgAcXOcoRt2daZfMf69xg+C89Y7mVa8qsL ENJc/pG3/SBvKKKsJ+PukYsWZ55FUQetJOntu0Od02sFNe42O3M9IU4MC4L6aOLcOV9c /G1eOPuH992RcrVa98nAiMkXvaEOfHYMNgI8gbenDe5d4w3XSSVvgDS6wtOVoMiCSzmH rSWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKjVBEpYLD+kVTlxT64CZA1swKBWHIkjjh6BMoHx8QBXMwDR4cD/bfW9qIaBnfg1GOX X-Received: by 10.195.11.229 with SMTP id el5mr17132343wjd.64.1482154702885; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kp5sm20741889wjb.8.2016.12.19.05.38.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:38:22 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Harish Patil , dev@dpdk.org, Dept-Eng DPDK Dev Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:38:21 +0100 Message-ID: <2614732.lzO8dLuuld@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1480733039-13046-1-git-send-email-harish.patil@qlogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] net/qede: fix maximum VF count to 0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:38:23 -0000 2016-12-12 18:13, Ferruh Yigit: > On 12/12/2016 5:47 PM, Harish Patil wrote: > >> btw, while checking feature list, I have seen qede_vf supports SR-IOV, > >> is that correct? > > > > Yes. The supported combination for SR-IOV is VF driver (qede PMD) with PF > > driver (qede linux driver). > > So you are using SR-IOV feature set in VF driver, as meaning VF driver > support exists. I don't know what SR-IOV feature mean for VF drivers. > Some other VF drivers not has this feature flag set. > > CC'ed Thomas for help, if this is the intention of the feature flag, it > is OK. Good question. I wonder where better describe the meaning of this row in the features table. Maybe it would be clearer by splitting in 2 rows: - SR-IOV VF - SR-IOV PF