From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5981A0C43; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:46:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFABE4068F; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:46:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9FD4003C for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:46:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DDA5C00F3; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:46:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:46:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= TCRKklt5r/hpQXfRF7rTiGBP2stDG5tQE9tJr36gOtE=; b=TCL/pLm6gNMHnjkg Rj852xiMZIt3Q6SHPTCXOnvsMDz5Eqoc+PILtsp8CyF6prwCTdCx7R+X5hDLUIU1 mnkgH/4XNioV9SUwy2vu7ZUccSBr9IqOD7s978b38sucuxDppQcfwle1t/t89/dF 5+PHY+hI1M5utMpj6UAORSg1GKGwnP4hv4zgboQcSP8g+necMF6GFXINplCd6T4m ZX8S94CnkxIsxzvGYDWSmLyRYojWW5CHK9rHcOKhe7km0r+dN67xvaVPBiwffOpz OlCyLDRyjH1I/JOzZ5tk2Faac9lXsmvMmMaCJsBspSj8Y9cSp/WfUqtemIjKYP4m 5OpLJg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=TCRKklt5r/hpQXfRF7rTiGBP2stDG5tQE9tJr36gO tE=; b=JXoED3s/MnL/+VjotMLcGmrt7AzN23POAcMNDFPB5WxGVziJVsGqG4tYp 71wj0LkZPrfveWnR8rK4o4bvJsAzvTuGNhqGYaFMAuWbAkYmK6ynvmTxpd0HHm9N Z1+8f1qA9ON6o1GLKUEFIucqFH7K+fM/gmIE6mFZw0OEFv0QCN6649nkYFDnAJ3g Lk7gWUHNzcXrkhTBpYQ1ZtiHgiRVwC1dTUMUNp8a8I4ky2iPzPaAcPmH/+3xpajP cQtVLsjVImBpYkiU6djTsfsccHHltumBRkwqXRbXD1aZXyrdmz0mQ+mojOgW668+ uulxjgyXKb9lGcMRtiOMskje02/cQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudegledguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:46:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ajit Khaparde Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dpdk-dev , David Marchand , Asaf Penso , John McNamara , Bruce Richardson Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 18:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: <2616975.G1blO3fqPY@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1610304247-11455-1-git-send-email-asafp@nvidia.com> <6502593.BjeyWQVfyn@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] doc: add release milestones definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/09/2021 18:11, Ajit Khaparde: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:53 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 03/09/2021 17:35, Ferruh Yigit: > > > On 9/3/2021 12:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 02/09/2021 18:33, Ferruh Yigit: > > > >> On 8/26/2021 11:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > >>> +* Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed. > > > >>> + > > > >>> +rc3 > > > >>> +~~~ > > > >>> + > > > >>> +* Priority: applications. No application feature should be accepted after -rc3. > > > >>> +* New functionality that does not depend on libraries update > > > >>> + can be integrated as part of -rc3. > > > >>> +* The application change must include documentation in the relevant .rst files > > > >>> + (application-specific and release notes if significant). > > > >>> +* Libraries and drivers cleanup are allowed. > > > >>> +* Small driver reworks. > > > >>> +* Critical and minor bug fixes. > > > >> > > > >> As mentioned before, my concern is this may create false impression that bugs > > > >> are fixed only in this phase. What about remove this line completely and update > > > >> below -rc4 one as 'Critical bug fixes only.'? I think that makes intention more > > > >> clear. > > > > > > > > I had added in -rc2: "Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed." > > > > Do you want to remove it as well? > > > > > > I think we can keep it, good to highlight one of the major tasks for -rc2 is to > > > fix defects found in -rc1, and it doesn't limit fixes to ones found in -rc1. > > > > Actually I think it is better to remove. > > It looks weird to have it only in -rc2. > I see you have sent the new version and it is looking really good. > > We can mention that bug fixes are welcome at any point in the cycle, I hope it is obvious. > but priority will be given to critical fixes close to the release date. Yes it says critical bug fixes only.