From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f169.google.com (mail-wj0-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B7110CBD for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:48:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c11so3211919wjx.3 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7zl6JBnKvmCBlA3V0wtA6D+wQKggJ2K4CdIFofKrSsg=; b=UdIY/c5xX5I0wunNAQW+oR5ibZxaDC48cnIpVzxRrk06911VI7+BtKKXJoaKItOYE0 bf0kjnpMfGpc/cRfe+uuo4b61TySLpaJsv63sahuqdMxN8iMsWwzO+gRf6fTXAvcEi3v Zzo5c5yVT7lEIIjoE48GKXbRtjYYjedMnWX95TSJOkHGfVcJOfMjlkZVL/yHWg69cjXn n4N9OQr8RHLzzTtYfKPH3u5AHkv2G3jl4tE+3uLO2HHkFugbdk5RUfEm83W0phQXIhGm LM3HMOiNsgQrbGvd3MdyhNlGi83D0zBx+/Mtpe2gDtlmQbHVpKxUHMysHN6CvV3TzZtf oYDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7zl6JBnKvmCBlA3V0wtA6D+wQKggJ2K4CdIFofKrSsg=; b=nQYYWq8LIGwTFcdakqhhL0cQMkLc/N12JNvvi+FzDCM8ursuACDcSCpAmWZCSX54SE tUvpy/Mxwn5ur2vnkqEuyjBVv01d+pMGX9aJDVjRa16jS33yon2VMxsDOvvU1knI4LST MjiXxvnOuSZdvJfmgvdxZxKQyyy1nGeKTTQyWsXFnRrIc/HfZlbg9hjnZ7d3GbcxVOUC gc8baXMk2CKGIUgEVE+FCAhKwv+A8ntO0l9I1OP3VdAysu/jnZOkEOHDODEjBpqoCx2K M6I16T7BseEJhIBuj7PeSM8W8Vix5MrKQ99y2Ca3JggIysbxdTsxfcVT8Hy9BLKeDvXn oyUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXICNC9AeerFIGghxKMkl3CeuQaTZxGdFhekKCPLEiSx+Nn/mjvJ5kITmJvxbkozfzsJ X-Received: by 10.194.14.196 with SMTP id r4mr6401079wjc.54.1482342530848; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g73sm28224588wme.16.2016.12.21.09.48.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:50 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jan Blunck Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, i.maximets@samsung.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, declan.doherty@intel.com, ehkinzie@gmail.com, bernard.iremonger@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:48:48 +0100 Message-ID: <2622375.75ISYoc1AV@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1479986809-14934-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> References: <1479986809-14934-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] bonding: setup all queues of slave devices X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:48:51 -0000 2016-11-24 12:26, Jan Blunck: > Prior to 16.11 some drivers (e.g. virtio) still had problems if their > queues where setup repeatedly. The bonding driver was working around the > problem by reusing already setup queues. This series of patches changes the > way how queue setup is done to give control to the driver to properly release > already initialized queues before they are setup again. Therefore the driver > call sequence is as if the number of queues is temporarily reduced before the > queues are setup again. > > Ilya Maximets (1): > Revert "bonding: use existing enslaved device queues" > > Jan Blunck (4): > ethdev: Call rx/tx_queue_release before rx/tx_queue_setup > ethdev: Free rx/tx_queues after releasing all queues > ethdev: Add DPDK internal _rte_eth_dev_reset() > net/bonding: Force reconfiguration of removed slave interfaces Applied, thanks