From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE5541C2D; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:09:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7947B42D3A; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:09:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0498342D39 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 10:09:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79DE32009EE; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 04:09:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Feb 2023 04:09:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1675760962; x= 1675847362; bh=/iFPQJ+D7y5/jWy+HgdnBmNI0mgboE8eElcGVS0k4Ks=; b=F r37PA/nWWEkAV4j0/RCjt69HqN093OQrDj8izrj58RnTUkz1uLczR5cdTA5W+ul1 DoRNluShpB7ctLtvt2iwvzJtjlZjc6h6SnM1ouJ3kPrdTmWyHxlB+rhfcQW61KKM JyVjlcQTeIkhYZZPAL5Q+9gJbAe37iA3T8aKAKYPZtstfq2Nler+ODiDija/02vn s1ARCMu28IfvtstAJ1ziniz+HGV+ZA7a00uDYlS1cbtVz/0DplshvVsyha2iHMgh UJ8kERLvMOM7tpL9Ru5Nb89WyLivTsVbb/n1BT3psDTH+QlLLAfhbwaR4Z4BoPqM HIgzfQBy9M6dPH9HsiJ9g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675760962; x= 1675847362; bh=/iFPQJ+D7y5/jWy+HgdnBmNI0mgboE8eElcGVS0k4Ks=; b=a zfBr3icMMlLKlPCjqAwZWbrMK5ZFrYFhHTRfmQ52qBK6ifV6wKFV8zWZexBLzfTp BBqvGWzZlIJsRHze4x1rGt+VGkMAU2u2AyNo1aB1h3XtHoNWnUISUDRbKWEzWdEj H9uwm4nm2EbKMq2+gIQpbXQ+7YeTPSpdK3G7WtowyFQaFyAqwzrsWEuUzTgcgc7p Ct9Bglz63soCgeGBmUIm8/F9AEumbOJtNrCtHxuzlKXrcivq0gUdVuoSOivosdxf MA2NfB7zIacf9C12dohxnsfVPpwQF5oUfPA9/9vpW51Z1UaJB3F/BUwJ++nIbH4l G+3sCD9/jxHw3nLWimR8Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudegjedguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 04:09:21 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Luca Boccassi , Bruce Richardson , John McNamara , Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: rebuild all Sphinx guides Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:09:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2628508.q0ZmV6gNhb@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20230207084352.3325416-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 07/02/2023 09:54, David Marchand: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 9:44 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > On some systems, Sphinx is lazy enough to not recompile an RST file, > > even if it contains a link pointing to a file which has been removed. > > > > In order to detect such broken links, > > the option "-a" is used to always rebuild all. > > I can't reproduce such behavior, but the principle looks ok to me and > I did not notice a difference in terms of time spending generating the > documentation. I think your system behaves with -a option forced somewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > We have no guide describing Sphinx, I'd rather update this patch title > like "doc: rebuild all guides with Sphinx". Yes > Reviewed-by: David Marchand