From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com (mail-we0-f175.google.com
 [74.125.82.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41756886
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:29:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q58so3617408wes.6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=kL+K3iGBf6F8rZhKnJmi/9gAfj75PnY5fiOo+KtsMi0=;
 b=mrI2P5VWG/m4rssVsx0vHGUJ+kGJ7GwtRn1rSjJSsq3/bIBCtRFEA9C0eoGAHDhLMz
 N8KZ/u97y/ZXb+FdUtrYWzvLZv/Swx1uTKUzlF+LJZbVS0efFuvY+fi/vfD5Ocj4fqKM
 ZOPKOrdGlNWCZZRvJOSo41H9PS4Ejie3D/7Vv0/amAPIyB5GeTFWem18afCWqFf/RW5Q
 ktOxm9M2xh7EuQmio6ttEC540MKTHUPuoqjdcEbrc76HB8giPSG6nQ/uVWPGOgB89j7k
 RjH0iXSn5wh8l2dF8Z5gTE6zh7Gv0pt8ZasS2xeC7rXJdiIS24Lhw4nlXJNjCYa0S077
 xwPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1gNVmTXsfWn6Ecr1y16Yx9NHC1vj8uB4ElJnKeszrqIOW6953ic0my3SaDfcW6Lo6YzaN
X-Received: by 10.180.211.239 with SMTP id nf15mr17998875wic.9.1395685835602; 
 Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (13.17.90.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.90.17.13])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo6sm41478043wib.7.2014.03.24.11.30.32
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:30:29 +0100
Message-ID: <2639617.qyW1YAv5A8@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.12.3 (Linux/3.13.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20140307181423.371047493@vyatta.com>
References: <20140307181335.024904493@vyatta.com>
 <20140307181423.371047493@vyatta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] qos: use rte_zmalloc instead of memzone
	for allocation
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:29:03 -0000

07/03/2014 10:13, Stephen Hemminger:
> Memory zone's are inflexible and can not be destroyed.
> The size is fixed when initially created therefor QoS parameters
> could not be modified at run time, because table size for a subport
> might change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>

This change would probably deserve a description of the use case.
Please explain in the log and/or comments why you need to increase this size.

-- 
Thomas