From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B423772
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:31:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so165371355wib.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=843a74zqqs0Bq0LkpPdt3afKSWR/HKoeBWJ+do/LE1c=;
 b=aIu/TIbPXC3zw//6O9/uB+DU+IWZVzQ5CeXn5HOluA9m/JN8Gi6IPHRKmJxrp3kHbG
 xbK/Lst3E/YmT0J9EIbhjqvJtgR+EIM/p2QOoTa/CBEhzIRu2ozp+GnTxbVl3IYadp6v
 SAZy3Vk+RwbcnF9VrCaRX9b8sytunph4eAh0AgO18ZsrNwCLxyRBrBvUUjczZietzeWR
 8aASeGqzBCuvwNMnKbb8oWrtwFvw7/OhPj7FyxavzImPVoQ3seYL2i0oNYHeR0oEqYfy
 SZ3s52GykShU/w2PNCrfMGqWmQW2azx5dAUiCYNlbwH4z9iw/+q7jucThFry94S5DgLw
 2WdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyZfI7BerQt0eepUF6QiEmigylGGV//n+0vE/wL/jgDbgAzcD3MctRZ4XOrQLIyjaMrwRo
X-Received: by 10.194.235.227 with SMTP id up3mr4082100wjc.132.1437561100731; 
 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck7sm1647465wjc.43.2015.07.22.03.31.39
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:30:28 +0200
Message-ID: <2646739.fctqXc0xZm@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A8941A9@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1436860647-5862-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
 <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A8941A9@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:31:41 -0000

2015-07-14 14:50, Zhang, Helin:
> From: Wu, Jingjing
> > Because VF multi-queues can be supported, l3fwd can run on vf.
> > Suggest to remove the l3fwd-vf example.
> Totally agree with this!
> But we need the confirmation from validation guys of that l3fwd works
> quite well on VF with all NICs (e.g. i350, 82599, x550, xl710, and fm10k).

Helin, any new from validation?