From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABE3A0C47; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4202410D5; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:10:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100F2407FF for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:10:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A365D5C0316; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 06:10:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 06:10:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= KDCRldnGVcvx3Sghcz9df3KzTZNzbV4b6fMVSVq6JYE=; b=ro33IQZYn6lfPwUR rDZI+Z+b/gR8bnDRzSF/NR9lFZiTls1+k+0jDDPHbWuyYgV5iZ7nKc/171OWYJmH YTL2AWdQZaHJnTkyHXnkpAYmuOYEHmOBYFuCKSvlB3YxetGxYd3vDhnuntijUUJo 9WWSg+RuehI+tJ+aLNoUxf6mEdA4+b4P6jx9Wx8j7fN5JjVnbGmf2AGJsjaeWQ46 z+o77+ewp3xfpAG9Ble3fIO0hZoVrGwW8uOMuq2lelDjMP29RRkh/VoGkFLwL/Db gJvIxCdtKmFnCPOsAzD3d8JH0he5FMFFmwWUNYjlK2iNaIPZb61x2KORMVRJPO6f 8hiDHw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KDCRldnGVcvx3Sghcz9df3KzTZNzbV4b6fMVSVq6J YE=; b=Y1t0DHMFyyHHNzqdpb7c9BKA2r6VQplsD4jtQq2GN9QPaZwGvy1fkNigO iFNfQ5BZc9bN9k+XPG7jL7DdtSEPyqNEXrTqyvauEZiKMBsKoqAvKNYFavArVoa4 l+2S8eXwcprfz72AxROSGXQpP0Q9GRJ7oH+eYCk0Zz6KjAgGg/5uLmHXgM0cV4gQ Pi7H4e8TTWRCGTWtK6Ue8CK6B6Tx5VpSpfVkxPcVtE4AR8tkg3HbCieev1aS1QvP VcEIcXHhqZ0OzxEX0HNHLYvGLNZL8nBu+0EioxdXtKoCWnfzStkM7k0+sM0cQ4FY TntNVN/CxiOB5ztqnBPxzyYsqg/3g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdefjedgudejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvffejueetleefieeludduuefgteejleevfeekjeefieegheet ffdvkeefgedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhn rdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 06:10:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Liguzinski, WojciechX" , "Singh, Jasvinder" , "Liu, Yu Y" , "Singh, Jasvinder" , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Ajmera, Megha" , "Liu, Yu Y" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: <2652393.2NFNvQLijv@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20211020075002.3871469-1-wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com> <11202335.JZDmDKIj46@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v18 0/5] Add PIE support for HQoS library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 26/10/2021 12:02, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 26/10/2021 10:24, Liu, Yu Y: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Would you merge this patch as the series is acked by Cristian as below? > > > > > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20211019081902.3514841- > > 1-wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com/ > > > > I didn't see any email from Cristian. > > It seems you just added this ack silently at the bottom of the cover letter. > > > > 1/ an email from Cristian is far better > > 2/ when integrating ack, it must be done in patches, not cover letter > > > > Hi Thomas, > > I did ack this set in a previous version (V15) by replying with "Series-acked-by" on the cover letter email, which does not show in patchwork. Is there a better way to do this? No you did the right thing (I missed this email on v15). But v16 did not show your ack. And v17 added it only in the cover letter instead of reporting it in all patches. > It would be good to have Jasvinder's ack as well on this series, as he is looking into some other aspects of the sched library. Yes