From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0832C46 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:56:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 191so98858029wmq.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:56:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t/7+y7e4QOEs1gCNB8/hpKmqyLBIuRW3BeAWnoqhgkM=; b=QYN+D6dZ1z7fBbPqA9rRMeA0p7WzPZk8yni3huG3sxPCqRQb8TkeC8wTS/bpX4dqem Tgfqn0dD4TENLtvqMN0KSXo8cQGTbt/qTyA25nti6XDFH0Hqosybra+5g3t9IpY/njXN 2PqpEPz2Fs5DGNTJNqbsrWzEzFkKB/K1gG1GvcJkSZ5cumXkX6HBEC7/FtkxoPafG4tD CPhjpG03gC45IaI4+LIrdQcdFNl7gB92D3veAV7J4fEVRHIqlz98yuF+oKJOo3Qd4WvY Y/DJHYo7MNRQaoCeqpiYoyMSplQaLEf8zs0kydT9Cq09JzIf+wkPCmbxENHvJ48wi4Uj RSsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=t/7+y7e4QOEs1gCNB8/hpKmqyLBIuRW3BeAWnoqhgkM=; b=VecIucObVIsEuTdoSP187Wgpa7gKBJIStdrnPBX3pq/gydSxRWpbsoDLhpGQk3VB6u NLHm6uZR5OhWnv7rdqsunO7911UgFvPnqK9Wbqe6VEClzX+7e+R/oQIV0CqDMyTQFbYj /r7nlU9uz5cKWDKCxmFL7tfXa6DjFfLLLnCI7iD9sfy4tsRRkruMC4hDYU8w2EYnh+w3 Nd72UXKoo/6X3DTUQf4Q4mvXslRQtF4rcDtA90+2gS/8NhVfuDfEipCT7tKZIzevO+35 cZX8Ke5OZeXBEOcv4siSXIybOmOWbRkuQqoygwpJb29mVl21PHc6bWUGbgFtsQvWYCly yRAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLei4WVN3klmTg/wybeMNJjYvWMvRVaAUXGHGRHSrqaNxWx3qh1b5xmlkMfypNicPR3 X-Received: by 10.28.103.3 with SMTP id b3mr23633790wmc.65.1459360584142; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (109.202.154.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.154.202.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uq10sm5037924wjc.38.2016.03.30.10.56.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:56:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Wenzhuo Lu Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:54:30 +0200 Message-ID: <2656437.D36Uy5eLlH@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1459305971-5480-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> References: <1459305971-5480-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe/base: fix VF multi-queue failure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:56:24 -0000 2016-03-30 10:46, Wenzhuo Lu: > When starting testpmd with multiple queues on a ixgbe VF > port, it failed with this printing, "nb_rxq(4) is greater > than max_rx_queues(1)". > > The root cause is the VF doesn't get the right max rx queue > number from PF and it uses the default value 1. > VF max rx queue number is set by PF through mailbox messages. > The message for this setting only supports version 1.1. As > message version is updated to 1.2, VF cannot parse the rx queue > number setting message correctly. > > This patch raise a specific base code update for this issue. > > Fixes: 72dec9e37a84 ("ixgbe: support multicast promiscuous mode on VF") > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu Applied, thanks