From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB41332A5 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:36:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id em10so1924123wid.17 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:36:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=EnXsufo1ltoDw/32pkY+dkFJnh5l5DeHZR6Bh7RfhE8=; b=bWrmnlLwXGq8AQGr5j02Qbiz2hGWtVUxW2jzVTzooWzcZN0nr7VKnWxhlcg4XMh0ry 8NlIlhqJYHCn7Pc1p1/N+h+PVwUE93vdqQKBTRk8xuvx6KLfLT3CWVRWl23OFy7vyjLO VkU8hN49/1T7rCFDgxf64w8pddh6HqQeGk5mLoNPm11gp74j+L0V6ZAiICH7tsSbnPJZ 2/wPaEvcl5Sae055g5YPprOggrPIpLROy0WOfEntpdBYhWhCQn+OrEAvp2bPpfKml0Ml 7R9GV7KvXTbnR4/KLf1lXY1HUiff2NHBWPWbrT6fOfUzgW4h657M4DFsS5gQCfDnub0X FmIw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1Ab2s1E2UTRbWv1CAvGoYRnom0JDtfU0XHxkxTWamz3qDVRDYAysvwQvpQtMjfjim4BFC X-Received: by 10.180.7.201 with SMTP id l9mr30842753wia.80.1417534609594; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:36:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k5sm25035867wjn.1.2014.12.02.07.36.48 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:36:48 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:36:20 +0100 Message-ID: <26754790.ZiWjDrWf5S@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.17.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-dev] endianness with ICC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:36:50 -0000 I'm looking at endian detection to make it work with several compilers. During this global check, I've seen some code specific to ICC: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h#n562 If it's still really useful, it should in rte_byteorder.h, not in testpmd. But, if possible, I'd prefer to remove this workaround. Any opinion? -- Thomas