From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A98AA0C4E; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:15:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2545514126A; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:15:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA4D141260 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:15:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368691589; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:15:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:15:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= 0uvUeGd8zU8lbjNOTm3Scpg9V1zhOopxa94wLi/kIFA=; b=TCCAJ41nz80r8YCL RMYBcsWfJ82HHVZUw8KETzSJKgp0ARaZaGV71zqQaXcRul0owG3KCoQyR6lG6yBx snfwxkLX06tn2NiIPC0t1kNz0ryeXhFCgCnYoxICnXnluJrbjlj4FDa3TKGa7H63 f29Mc1zwnWUjp0V7DZVqhgkSJQ/IbWCUPOHfVZV+xRH6GC1IgexWiJRzTz53m8Pt Nx6zNeubcn4bJWvgxrw/2Rw2GYMFPIwOr/O0m57Z3lclR9TDVv7V49zNAszqs0tb bDjingFPbxMqTvK0DB466fPynCrqvfzOV6KmwZyJHp7/pD8qwQyDay9v9+90ivc9 Gvg9EA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=0uvUeGd8zU8lbjNOTm3Scpg9V1zhOopxa94wLi/kI FA=; b=f014O41Al5OW9bzIFipN1MtJd7BuThwRq82aoquRmor7QST4aoZPtYQz5 /fv18p+0QS7rOALJ/EIMy96VAPvLJO8jG7Nq0PeekwwiSEQQnxTbLUJq6EdWo7mt M0fswmTYu2Node0d2AggdY64So3HvsYIHXvuE57La/kuD6tfAgKDqlycg7Fu1GuB wMia9dhRNFBvfjQfX3e0Xl5mcBHqCLMb7xYwiVNbd7mSdcA/V2XvNWIYDbtQ3DYM U9pO8YEb8ecLgH5fWeRJtIBBonOqI/2X5TuQTVVBRem+kG08XaqUmlaKG02J+ZjD BD5zOFrtJOckWuWX+thKjfucuJ87A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudejledgudeiudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 57C4C240057; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:15:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Michal Krawczyk Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 23:15:07 +0200 Message-ID: <2693319.IsJ0DLlnzu@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210326104759.280175-1-mk@semihalf.com> References: <20210326104759.280175-1-mk@semihalf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Fix unit tests execution for ENA PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 26/03/2021 11:47, Michal Krawczyk: > ENA PMD uses timer service to implement various periodic device status > check routine. Because of that, it already initializes the timer > subsystem. As unit tests also initalizes the timer subsystem, return > value is equal to -EAGAIN, as it was already done by the ENA PMD. > > This patch set adds missing documentation that this kind of return code > may appear and this is not a failure and also changes unit tests tool, > to do not fail if timer subsystem was already initialized. > > Stanislaw Kardach (2): > timer: clarify subsystem_init return value > test: proceed if timer subsystem was initialized Applied, thanks