From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248FEA04E7;
	Thu,  5 Nov 2020 17:58:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AD72BF5;
	Thu,  5 Nov 2020 17:58:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86A12B89
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  5 Nov 2020 17:58:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2005C00EF;
 Thu,  5 Nov 2020 11:58:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:58:46 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh=
 ly9PiqYgmIGwSs+NbUIja+cGfxb+4ZJ/z87nY9pW3z0=; b=sT0sua0gpN5AkdpC
 Y5UjQXpFL3gf7AB8SAkAfsXO06PNe3CsEILu/2A3hKTIyaguVQma6Ym2RzZncxE1
 c0Bf0C7DRz9SgpdaQ3/BWlnloePFFlzz+Ck5CE2LSBTX7UhCMgn2cXAgoY/sltwg
 B6uoK6HumdTVdCi3IWmsJ+xMXYeUQyCC5Fg5bwKe0WlOYVCo2QB50axgH07ZESP5
 D2zuG82p+jvfUzWY5tIIYEvNraoUEwltCYgj1JJZaQQRwH1i4qzPqK2m/LNJb+b2
 NeCMHCX74jOwgsV1dp0T6nFU2BAbW32/WlswFiCOjZ0719EWyQf8TckPpOVW2ise
 ACxgzA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ly9PiqYgmIGwSs+NbUIja+cGfxb+4ZJ/z87nY9pW3
 z0=; b=hLYCcWeuGhgR3u+qNBnP/YrSu1bgbwN1+MqQiYc9QpeIOVGGOviMEcG4O
 JQBbj9L6qFpIOwdXiuFZ9px0QvHa9TOV1eU5wpzaxN400ehXOrSg1YyVDjJ1j+er
 KBbTxwvOULAaBQeF5TPGC8PxmX+zdjLrjHDVFiUHhXY3tnw99zjld9apnGHEeiuL
 +jGnPWE9CLGm8bKdOL9caSv6VvYMHcwS7u2uDuRQoaEqhtjWjiJHxodqoKEFosjF
 rKaox4FLjhfSflabsh6y2FDoYMnbR4JJgc47OqiCC/hfBL7RkSKvG884aBZxNRYV
 V+eqW5LbbPruCqbuYLG8Z94f18WBQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Ri-kX5D1rbZaNag9ji8aaAZDoEBGl4JHAdeuGYnIRSa9E6H7Sm90Xw>
 <xme:Ri-kX3gKZ5sUwiEertGbhY_VenI2dmol9qWGs1BBhO3YVO0geVlHIv7VjmDL3o45A
 x7pmBGGvmB-rp55ag>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddtjedgleehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
 cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttddunecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr
 shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg
 ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeegffeihfeftedthfdvgfetkeffffdukeevtdevtddvgfevuedu
 veegvdeggedtnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf
 hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl
 ohhnrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Ri-kX0mdR2z6vMt0h8SKrctRI9C7jZG85Sfim2ZfU5jEPBf73Q2gUQ>
 <xmx:Ri-kXzz6_AN2v4Lu9OVe0SvLdf_pEB6lNjQOnq3p066ycDhvnFr7FA>
 <xmx:Ri-kX-Q3HO_5ubI2DsJW-6dGGDuvdxmYEmaz15vYyi5gvipJHqvfFw>
 <xmx:Ri-kX366xaoCUNCBE3bSKgyYXK45WZjP96Hg6z5DL-W4jKTzuXZa1g>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 99FF53280345;
 Thu,  5 Nov 2020 11:58:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 17:58:44 +0100
Message-ID: <2693408.MRr9Qu1Uht@thomas>
In-Reply-To: <20201105133611.GU1898@platinum>
References: <20200916081747.124520-2-mb@smartsharesystems.com>
 <20201026144201.54899-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com>
 <20201105133611.GU1898@platinum>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] mbuf: minor cleanup
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

05/11/2020 14:36, Olivier Matz:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:42:01PM +0100, Morten Br=F8rup wrote:
> > The mbuf header files had some commenting style errors that affected the
> > API documentation.
> > Also, the RTE_ prefix was missing on a macro and a definition.
> >=20
> > Note: This patch does not touch the offload and attachment flags that a=
re
> > also missing the RTE_ prefix.
> >=20
> > Changes only affecting documentation:
> > * Removed the MBUF_INVALID_PORT definition from rte_mbuf.h; it is
> >   already defined in rte_mbuf_core.h.
> >   This removal also reestablished the description of the
> >   rte_pktmbuf_reset() function.
> > * Corrected the comment related to RTE_MBUF_MAX_NB_SEGS.
> > * Corrected the comment related to PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT.
> >=20
> > Changes regarding missing RTE_ prefix:
> > * Converted the MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK() macro to an
> >   __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() inline function.
> >   Added backwards compatible macro with the original name.
> > * Renamed the MBUF_INVALID_PORT definition to RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID.
> >   Added backwards compatible definition with the original name.
> >=20
> > v2:
> > * Use RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID instead of MBUF_INVALID_PORT in rte_mbuf.c.
> >=20
> > v3:
> > * The functions/macros used in __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() require
> >   RTE_ENABLE_ASSERT or RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG, or they don't use the mbuf
> >   parameter, which generates a compiler waning. So mark the mbuf parame=
ter
> >   __rte_unused if none of them are defined.
> >=20
> > v4:
> > * Removed compile time variants of __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check(); keepi=
ng
> >   the one variant where the mbuf parameter is marked __rte_unused.
> > * Reflect in the __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() description headline that
> >   it is for debug mode.
> > * Improved the description of RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID.
> > * Updated sfc driver to use __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() instead of
> >   MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK().
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Morten Br=F8rup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
>=20
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>=20
> Thanks!

Applied, thanks