From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6CE1B34D for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:59:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA6420977; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 16:59:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 16:59:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=9OnXbsHsDuBZjx7r+XDL9H2g8k 1znk6ldE3xGr6KQmk=; b=mZvkcWOB6FsY0N6zSCG40SA7qmbG9vfQOcLtjrkKoX 2v7W9pHwY49FmeCHNgPrfEsdhjP4lwKKM7oedV40hszKuiZAEP8y6B4TQA/S2cJH wRQYKuGbNPNeXgEuYD8d8egdLADKTj6B++q8yLvsFjtue9KYp+B2VXyde30RX8OY U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9OnXbs HsDuBZjx7r+XDL9H2g8k1znk6ldE3xGr6KQmk=; b=DF6sN2MHZM0mLK4kgcq7C6 m7igLRC37y3FEKSqyDgC7dTbjKLIQeanpQUW1Wi3Qsr/do/Q0HuwZB+NsYT4XAz2 nE87ruhnl3+AukPLv2XCbBme8MCBV8m2JeM2OEaEsKzexYMT5SIVNMKZ0/5sWgDr ocOhOAC59jbs4h++JxJfnsP/2QCW/r7emX4H6wKwvJuPstHr+gWoZxHiCzE1hWgv 4RQycNCO3Y3qLJS4EKZpW75Uj2LJxJfN3v0UeFEW9gabMzdj9diu41inpnwBaYsA cGhSoNlRHcxLIatzbZio34LYswQCIAQMzVLpbEWNvrLoRcsMUY597vQIX/Owc8XA == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4309C7EC36; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 16:59:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Akhil Goyal Cc: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, radu.nicolau@intel.com, aviadye@mellanox.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, declan.doherty@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, borisp@mellanox.com, sandeep.malik@nxp.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, shahafs@mellanox.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:59:11 +0200 Message-ID: <26943210.ye3ieRSP5B@xps> In-Reply-To: <1c66817c-dfe5-4194-0406-57e2da7cdbe4@nxp.com> References: <20171006181151.4758-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> <1c66817c-dfe5-4194-0406-57e2da7cdbe4@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/12] introduce security offload library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:59:15 -0000 22/10/2017 22:37, Akhil Goyal: > Hi All, > On 10/21/2017 9:43 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > On 10/20/2017 3:02 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 16/10/2017 12:44, Thomas Monjalon: > >>> 15/10/2017 00:17, Akhil Goyal: > >>>> This patchset introduce the rte_security library in DPDK. > >>>> This also includes the sample implementation of drivers and > >>>> changes in ipsec gateway application to demonstrate its usage. > >>> [...] > >>>> This patchset is also available at: > >>>> git://dpdk.org/draft/dpdk-draft-ipsec > >>>> branch: integration_v4 > >>> > >>> If I understand well, this patchset is the result of the group work? > >>> Nothing else is needed to merge for the IPsec offload features? > > Yes this patchset is a result of a group work. > > We do not need anything else to be merged for ipsec offload features. > > But Aviad has made some fixes in the ipsec application which may result > > in conflict with the last patch in this series. > > So v4 was just rebased over those patches sent by Aviad separately. > > We would send a v5 incorporating/answering to all the comments/queries > > rebased over the v2 of the Aviad's fixes to the application. > > > > Just for information, > I have rebased the rte_security patches over crypto-next and over > Aviad's v2. The patches are available at the draft tree > "git://dpdk.org/draft/dpdk-draft-ipsec", branch integration_v5. > > The patchset include the changes suggested by Thomas and Konstantin on v4. > > The patches are not sent to the mailing list as the ipsec-secgw patches > from Aviad needs a v3 and I would like to send the patch set rebased > over the v3. I will send the patchset as soon as Aviad's patches are > ready to be merged(most probably on Monday). > > Please let me know in case, there is some risk in getting this series > applied in RC2. Thanks for the info Akhil. A lot of other things are not yet ready for RC2. You are still in time.