From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DBEA046B for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:06:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DAD1B958; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:06:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA345F11; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:06:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9FC2220D; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:06:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:06:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=KqPXID/RxKQf1jk6vTi0z0HMnTtUb5O2QYUiACLPsD8=; b=g57hec5dX7tL brHSxepXTzRhPWLZ209NiquzdqTdca/ddUGGIzsSI5EVrqEjeEGOo5+p4yONPI2m 6Jy9V9CmWa9Be4QC3mk19hF9CpzEavwEhO1tAsbDuIZzHSTgqTJxra9BWZc/SOn0 9hAuYi18z/3Ge0KHAG6LSrMg7aimcGo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=KqPXID/RxKQf1jk6vTi0z0HMnTtUb5O2QYUiACLPs D8=; b=sNhUZVB6C20F+x2SCD0NApDRaU1IgnYEQhOk6QN9BQDeqIErWlm0RpXxt GnMt7pA37BdczQtnR4ynoEV/BpAUtbSu7eJqliycYFrh/EFOuUIuebROkRWGEuyr kQqLKTTgi/bv2bZ9ThLB5uwxQ93ZZbrsBgYl0RgYl+OeDI7GIFCFzoPYLev/K9MY y0mHJuu+HD9rUls7KlfHJIMRIy6U9798boUP1nQS4ZzdWiOIp9F2+JQWfi4S/PFF XlGtzfKJOYMsKlT/RXgNna3qirABuxS9WYTP8Kkw9V4I/+xuJ5kZMtXcJNjNuksT OqaL9b7AlMf4L8J/wzXQT3E3goJ6g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudekgdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E1A2D380079; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:06:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Konstantin Ananyev Cc: dev@dpdk.org, akhil.goyal@nxp.com, stable@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: <2698626.FYnisS8m0y@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190606113328.12883-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> References: <20190606113328.12883-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ip_frag: fix IPv6 fragment size calculation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/06/2019 13:33, Konstantin Ananyev: > Take into account IPv6 fragment extension header when > calculating data size for each fragment. > > Fixes: 7a838c8798a9 ("ip_frag: fix IPv6 when MTU sizes not aligned to 8 bytes") > Fixes: 0aa31d7a5929 ("ip_frag: add IPv6 fragmentation support") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev Applied, thanks