From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ashwin Sekhar T K <ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
"jianbo.liu@linaro.org" <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>,
"techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>,
"govboard@dpdk.org" <govboard@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 21:21:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA9B020A24@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2129466.Tj9XCbWHIe@xps>
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
>
> There can be a licensing issue here.
> We may need advice from the Governing Board and the Technical Board.
That's correct. This uses a 2-clause BSD license, but the Intellectual Property Policy section in the Project Charter (http://dpdk.org/about/charter#ip) specifies 3-clause BSD. If you really need to use a new license, then you'll need to make a request to the Governing Board as specified in clause 6.c in the charter.
>
> 18/05/2017 12:21, Ashwin Sekhar T K:
> > +/*
> > + * https://github.com/halayli/lthread which carries the following
> license.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2012, Hasan Alayli <halayli@gmail.com>
> > + *
> > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> > + * are met:
> > + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
> copyright
> > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> the
> > + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> distribution.
> > + *
> > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
> > + * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
> THE
> > + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE
> > + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
> LIABLE
> > + * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
> CONSEQUENTIAL
> > + * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE
> GOODS
> > + * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
> INTERRUPTION)
> > + * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
> CONTRACT, STRICT
> > + * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN
> ANY WAY
> > + * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF
> > + * SUCH DAMAGE.
> > + */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-17 18:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-17 18:44 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-18 6:35 ` Jianbo Liu
2017-05-18 7:38 ` Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-05-18 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18 8:55 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-18 9:00 ` Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-05-18 10:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18 10:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-18 10:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-03 20:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-03 21:21 ` O'Driscoll, Tim [this message]
2017-07-04 7:37 ` Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-07-04 14:02 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2017-07-04 8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04 8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04 8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04 8:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04 8:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] examples/performance-thread: reorganise arch dependent code Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04 8:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] examples/performance-thread: add arm64 support Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-07-04 13:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA9B020A24@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
--cc=ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=govboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=jianbo.liu@linaro.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).