From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F6C11C5 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:15:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by widjy10 with SMTP id jy10so83180153wid.1 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=8C7iOvgQPQWnOKPtTupD43rvDc2jjRI57WM1wiXrF9I=; b=I8otmxkS59RyDUCiQlYnsqN1F0/d7NHXJbad2H1vTVZUcpL6UNLJJSqvjW4ihgCNR6 QYT4w1+uMkKJ7PLHinuOMHTsA1khJe4cMNDKoOTBmDyOVvRx1RRjRZBbmAiY4OS2Ec7C ifMzpTa5Rik4HNp6B0r8UN6AxKO3GRTUAVjGUq0QKO246oHt/LdzLb7haa2sJSOHwnmr GfYTM4+HeZ0Ng2I0gGyUIcs5z8oRxIZzI7ki8JpnPV080U0tnWOTgL2MwBj1WPERsBX9 8iaog/ylyQU+yxlQJa5ZPwvGAICnqnNxBQKWcYLa8/FaQ9xxqniWtQMUlZvyO9SCGwj7 gQ+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkuJ+dQsf8aWS5S7w+DCGKRQ3XLBjhpLWKbeLi7SVaWuaUB0iZtP+1lXdDL7tiO2+oYSO4L X-Received: by 10.194.205.37 with SMTP id ld5mr61902684wjc.14.1435839309632; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.151.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bg6sm7882264wjc.13.2015.07.02.05.15.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:15:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:14:01 +0200 Message-ID: <2707498.ThPVHMap7h@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1435332578-28415-2-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> References: <1433586732-28217-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> <1435332578-28415-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> <1435332578-28415-2-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/9] eal: move librte_malloc to eal/common X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:15:10 -0000 2015-06-26 16:29, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/common/* > F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/* > F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/ > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst > +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst > F: app/test/test_alarm.c > F: app/test/test_atomic.c > F: app/test/test_byteorder.c > @@ -97,6 +98,8 @@ F: app/test/test_spinlock.c > F: app/test/test_string_fns.c > F: app/test/test_tailq.c > F: app/test/test_version.c > +F: app/test/test_malloc.c > +F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c I think we should keep a separate maintainer section for memory allocator in EAL. I suggest this: Memory allocation M: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_mem* F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_malloc.h F: lib/librte_eal/common/*malloc* F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mem* F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_hugepages.h F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst F: app/test/test_malloc.c F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c > Secondary process > K: RTE_PROC_ > @@ -155,12 +158,6 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/ > Core Libraries > -------------- > > -Dynamic memory > -F: lib/librte_malloc/ > -F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst > -F: app/test/test_malloc.c > -F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c > - > Memory pool