DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Cc: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
	olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] app/procinfo: Fix memory leak by rte_service_init
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:26:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27105962.SPFB230vh8@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA651006FDA@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>

26/01/2018 18:15, Van Haaren, Harry:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > 11/01/2018 20:47, Vipin Varghese:
> > > When procinfo is run multiple times against primary application, it
> > > consumes huge page memory by rte_service_init. Which is not released
> > > at exit of application.
> > >
> > > Invoking rte_service_finalize to real memory and prevent memory leak.
> > 
> > I don't think it is correct to call rte_service_finalize in applications,
> > while rte_service_init is called in EAL.
> > 
> > Maybe we need a new function in EAL.
> 
> Yes correct - we need a rte_eal_deinit(), cleanup() or finalize() or something. This ties in with splitting EAL to be more modular on startup, and DPDK in general behaving more like a library and less like a single-monolith.
> 
> For the 18.02 timeframe, the simplest solution to solve the secondary process mem-leak issue than to merge into these applications, unfortunately. 
> 
> The only other option I see is to add an rte_eal_finalize() function, and hide this call behind it, however it is quite late to add such a function, and what do we do with cases like rte_panic(), rte_exit(), or system signals like SIGINT, SIGHUP etc? It seems too complicated to add "quickly" to me.
> 
> If there is technically a better solution viable in the given timeframe, I'm open to suggestions?

I think it is better to keep the leak in 18.02,
and takes time to fix it properly in 18.05.

If you really think it is a major bug, we can try to expose a new
EAL function now and refine it in 18.05.

More opinions?

      reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-31 15:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] [app/procinfo] fix memory leak - PCAP & service Vipin Varghese
2018-01-08 12:07 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-01-11 19:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/procinfo: Fix memory leak by rte_service_init Vipin Varghese
2018-01-26 15:44   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-01-26 16:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-26 17:15     ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-01-26 17:26       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27105962.SPFB230vh8@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).