From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B61455D8; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:58:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AFE42FCF; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:58:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fhigh2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.153]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE0B40E4D for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:58:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF6D11424A0; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 04:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Jul 2024 04:58:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1720515485; x=1720601885; bh=XnSNi2w+3V8AlXWPzedE/exqQRWQV5vAY1Is3i4cbPk=; b= Q06tg4Kzzl/DnFjxhkcTH182ZAAeS9I6VDe4yqkF0lDKu4ttNyy03wZVUAPrStnl XaFQeLY8mLK0KotfFFYN4FWGkG5lXJSFzfIykQkxIMyYY0YBnWI2NKDTt1SjlF9A SLYZRpPHwuAdsRByvqThvoA4ef0TspBB059THHfhe5pbyJByByE/VANBDO/M0Hky dczv8kfGMbnNGyP9HN9njdf9YrP6OBmw0llG5XA+x771ixAsjASd4+XUHxqq6qFq bY8lnOUjTt8pvShjuM7ZY9s46Sr/tvN5eAI8OXJj9SOGuSQCqC8OtKdQJ3sETgkZ Nfik4o/ntfQUKP6Bftn7gg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1720515485; x= 1720601885; bh=XnSNi2w+3V8AlXWPzedE/exqQRWQV5vAY1Is3i4cbPk=; b=C TF4Ivi9CONpFmXZnkRsykr9wGn1xBP8xuiySQ1eJtE1rGCJKfa2wnJU1LQhjeXnr I7vo65H10MOQNMRM6BUyhZvZQg/7vh0edHlmEE88XiNM7RtTwjkXPW1FV41GozJj +I/ZGzovNChod4cY2MdXKRIrryu/BUk0eVX6zrfOKl3mW2Ga1KcUFsc/pzJukfSG jB192CSiogO0RppWqPgqyV+PjnxAE5kiL3a6K3Adi9T8Pl2XK5phmXDl++LOqL3F oNeZh2rgC8XFRGPnu8D9FvneD/Ac81tMiO2J1bKwRxbrFpzWyaqOyo1mX8b3j9Ng ekxQpqffZOKi/bRcUwNXg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdelgddutdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeduveehieevuddutdevfffgtdegkeeuveejffejgedtgeegkefg vdeugfefkeejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 04:58:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [RFC] test: remove dead cfgfile tests Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 10:57:55 +0200 Message-ID: <2738480.mvXUDI8C0e@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20240708165640.5475-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20240708165640.5475-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 08/07/2024 18:55, Stephen Hemminger: > The tests for the cfgfile library were never built since the conversion > to meson (in 2017). Remove the dead code and files, if someone wants > to fix them then they can be restored later. > See commit b5dc795a8a55 ("test: build app with meson as dpdk-test") > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 - > app/test/meson.build | 2 - > app/test/resource.c | 276 --------------- > app/test/resource.h | 106 ------ > app/test/test_cfgfile.c | 334 ------------------ As far as I remember, resource tests are different of cfgfile. What is the problem of building cfgfile tests? Many errors? Which kind of error?