From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629A0A04C2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:22:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0A61C11E; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:22:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C271C11A; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:22:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E54258015B; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:22:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:22:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= zWFRn6zBjmtK/6gorOhPpgC2AyCt3NX9fvr13k/CPuI=; b=Aw6AyOMIg48ciWr5 H1ocVS81W/tbopJJcQgFKO/YPUcgXz4l1XXhxof3/3cz4XPyjuI4kcZ+Rmo7d46d Ln8cqmTQPb8DGyOYhbM+L2VtLsNhvLA5L08lo9R0yGCFKKeOurxNvR/2awCY2YhW jY2Km2NM8bRWhgDa+pc2RCTSuplwdBf++K0PMDhSI8rI3q26UVCuxV8p4oNp2cQ/ yjn0ZbdGOu7NOVr3fb84fW+WZn2zgypH5CS1ZcqWiGCeIfjPc3jrwx22As3G7whD WrZZV6ELuppUi0AG6mDvoNHMm6zKWFGrWuHmt4tQtk5ILNkaMkivMP7f1hc6As2F /fuaIg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=zWFRn6zBjmtK/6gorOhPpgC2AyCt3NX9fvr13k/CP uI=; b=YTMb9Bh8D+lacmIzUeu+UZTDWgV3arU0ySrdEprjcMkFV1JJn2YspiC8Z ZVxwF0EKqAbiS2Kmwg1Ywcr40ypjYHYwCS1akdtX77lhPrwkK6HlHMPBbuhSjb91 IYQkErg5gfyjNuECtoNMsfnr1ghdJJdLVTvswiK8vTUpSIfeRX6WHX7g1Js2bIZv Z+fe08i1B3Bs6r9X3Lz35mSOklM2lSWou1mZodMu5NymOlviqMi7ybBDy3cuIMqb YjmHHehRfnqvhe4SXAsnP4ZgA1OIZfjPFQrNxpPHxy6+TZ+hflrqqJzlPzFlKb/F cECidRDTjopa6U/0oMsrrC/ekbBBw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrledvgddvjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepleefrdeirddugeelrdduudegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdr nhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2A20830600B2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 06:22:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: "Dybkowski, AdamX" , "Trahe, Fiona" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Roy Fan" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "bluca@debian.org" , Akhil Goyal , "Mcnamara, John" , techboard@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:22:01 +0200 Message-ID: <2746539.uKBtBRbGyR@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200812095209.GA312@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200727094113.2849-1-adamx.dybkowski@intel.com> <3567036.vTBxH0KFj1@thomas> <20200812095209.GA312@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: scheduler API deprecation notice X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 12/08/2020 11:52, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 10/08/2020 13:49, Trahe, Fiona: > > > Sorry about that Thomas, Akhil, we should have chased up acks sooner. > > > > > > Given the proposed content of the patch, and the similar changes that are recommended and agreed > > > throughout DPDK do you think an exception can be made and that this change can get into 20.11 even > > > without the deprecation notice being in 20.08? > > > > That's a question for techboard. > > > > PS: please avoid top-posting > > > My initial 2c is that we should allow this, and add the required > deprecation notice to the online docs immediately. I would assume most > people use the online docs rather than building their own from the package, > therefore adding in a deprecation notice to the online versions a few days > after a release should not be a major problem IMHO. > > Also, given the fact that we have once-a-year at most to apply ABI > changes, and this is the first time we are going this, so I think a little > latitude should be given! :-) I agree We need more opinions from other techboard members to make it a decision.