From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EABA0540; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:57:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A94A1D716; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:57:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BDD1D65F for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:57:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFFFCBD; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:57:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:57:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= E2DokcShSCyc5cGzrRaoZD2ByiH04DrPawQmp8CXN48=; b=KDlDW8s8SlmvXfe5 Lngi2aPczHvgWeXbFJKYJKEHl36rF/KNoQqv86ipNgeg9fzXdMQz32folXsTSA9Q I0rK5MyXRpG3NnMrR4Z45id8V9N0pBFlLkU77SNPzDZ0L1qCZ3Dnln6AOljK2mKV YUR9W04jeamiP865bDN+GZV06OKgcIkWXkk8uCOEkwc0HgUB6yMKeLfxZbMH/a3A x+44uDtMn849Cs72amQALjPbUdBBdsk50qsgZMah869AE46IE+Ls8c4WuR8KVFWS LCR+OrdoK8R5rt9eud6ZWGYR4ocOnSjuxcjyVeO7AhDpU0JXeE1uIwjLEoSmYuH9 2mfe9Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=E2DokcShSCyc5cGzrRaoZD2ByiH04DrPawQmp8CXN 48=; b=nONOWZCa6Obt1wVIbG3F6AqH6sC70d45LtK6JYDWsKBjZOk1AgntoLG3+ rXrCUsZ4mEB9oJe0MS7qhuoK101I1Ga/hgVFcuEa+00Y4rwvcupsgL1CVeCO+uqv WzZmR2+drWGgtq5EwJRVx1YdD3egpqfLEtmKCmJ3qSVEoG5FvafBuuNcwTfclxL6 slbcl4Cjqs0XQNauxP3tNwvWwvHtw58xPSzAgxqIKFYFYOrJuLVZh4AdCN43H+iq 0YFcLwrJ0Nfp8RhnTRjN/GahLuYIYajyQ7yRDdNT2F5sob/uOcL7Py2kJD67Ro2N 1D6slASjKvM768ucWEsyYjTF6BRIQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrvdekgdejvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E3B8A3280064; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:57:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "arybchenko@solarflare.com" , "jielong.zjl@antfin.com" , "Eads, Gage" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "Yigit, Ferruh" Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: <2765998.MCZjnkkAh3@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200629161024.29059-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> <40884900.fRxCVIVvzE@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mempool/ring: add support for new ring sync modes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 13/07/2020 14:58, Ananyev, Konstantin: > > 10/07/2020 18:21, Konstantin Ananyev: > > > Two new sync modes were introduced into rte_ring: > > > relaxed tail sync (RTS) and head/tail sync (HTS). > > > This change provides user with ability to select these > > > modes for ring based mempool via mempool ops API. > > > > No, the user cannot use these modes because there is no doc, > > except in release notes. > > AFAIK, there is no section for rte_ring and others SW based > mempool drivers: > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/mempool/index.html > Are you asking me to add such section as part of this patch? I'm asking to provide some documentation to the users yes. It can be in doc you pointed above with a link from the prog guide: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/mempool_lib.html#mempool-handlers And because it is solving issues in some use cases, it needs to be called out why and when use these options.