[dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

[dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

[Hemant Agrawal]

This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license
definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is
not required to be added SPDX license.

Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
---
 license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/license/exceptions.txt b/license/exceptions.txt
index c984764a0..3afb996ed 100644
--- a/license/exceptions.txt
+++ b/license/exceptions.txt
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ IP License policy as defined in DPDK Charter available at:
 
 Note that following licenses are not exceptions:-
 	- BSD-3-Clause
-	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
-	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
+	- BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
+	- BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
 	- GPL-2.0  (*Only for kernel code*)
 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:28:40 +0530
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:

> This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license
> definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is
> not required to be added SPDX license.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> ---
>  license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/license/exceptions.txt b/license/exceptions.txt
> index c984764a0..3afb996ed 100644
> --- a/license/exceptions.txt
> +++ b/license/exceptions.txt
> @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ IP License policy as defined in DPDK Charter available at:
>  
>  Note that following licenses are not exceptions:-
>  	- BSD-3-Clause
> -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
> +	- BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> +	- BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
>  	- GPL-2.0  (*Only for kernel code*)
>  
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Makes sense to me, but probably needs Board legal approval

Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

[Hemant Agrawal]

Hi Bruce,
	Will you please check it with Trishan and DPDK GB board?

DPDK license indicates the correct license types in: 
http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/license/README

However in exception files we added the keyword "Dual" - which is unnecessary and not part of standard SPDX definition. 

I hope they have no objection in getting it corrected.

Regards,
Hemant

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 10:52 PM
> To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to
> avoid confusion
> Importance: High
> 
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:28:40 +0530
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license definitions to
> > avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is not required to be added SPDX
> > license.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/license/exceptions.txt b/license/exceptions.txt index
> > c984764a0..3afb996ed 100644
> > --- a/license/exceptions.txt
> > +++ b/license/exceptions.txt
> > @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ IP License policy as defined in DPDK Charter available at:
> >
> >  Note that following licenses are not exceptions:-
> >  	- BSD-3-Clause
> > -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> > -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
> > +	- BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> > +	- BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
> >  	- GPL-2.0  (*Only for kernel code*)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------------------------
> 
> Makes sense to me, but probably needs Board legal approval

Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

[Hemant Agrawal]

ping ...

Thomas - this change is very trivial

On 7/28/2020 11:28 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license
> definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is
> not required to be added SPDX license.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> ---
>   license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/license/exceptions.txt b/license/exceptions.txt
> index c984764a0..3afb996ed 100644
> --- a/license/exceptions.txt
> +++ b/license/exceptions.txt
> @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ IP License policy as defined in DPDK Charter available at:
>   
>   Note that following licenses are not exceptions:-
>   	- BSD-3-Clause
> -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
> +	- BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> +	- BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
>   	- GPL-2.0  (*Only for kernel code*)
>   
>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion

[Thomas Monjalon]

28/07/2020 07:58, Hemant Agrawal:
> This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license
> definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is
> not required to be added SPDX license.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> ---
>  Note that following licenses are not exceptions:-
>  	- BSD-3-Clause
> -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> -	- Dual BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
> +	- BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> +	- BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
>  	- GPL-2.0  (*Only for kernel code*)

Applied, thanks and sorry for the delay.
I guess I was waiting for a board approval as reply to the patch.