From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com (mail-wr0-f172.google.com [209.85.128.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824C6201 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:46:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id i10so102488997wrb.0 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:46:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rwjN3+btOK9xLMEbX6CUh3ewGwXB3ILW0oF5UA0R5jc=; b=Oh6PXb4bi8jatdzVc01wEwB2TX9QDKON9QlifRCscdeelWGRoWCKP7WrJeUKRU9mKW kmrEvnXPP22WGvHY+jIe9eNJvICbMT5f590z5TrUBTyrQDDod62ZCjaBIzHW8MMQzsrc 5qmNLIezhl2lgZfAf3y2oLdoJ8gw9xGXxSTMsaOXOIeJl6j0Oj78CDmZkjgzJown2zKD 4mQyYlRfFX61U54yau2trUjJnzMxtTxoP5WIIb5FPcajRrcKyxeeSyhHNm1WvONmQPK0 zG55QtzdX38rJsJ8W5AFSiRhiat3lE6YK/FiXt314js1O23uENvqL9UqhgL9/RG2kDFw e/yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rwjN3+btOK9xLMEbX6CUh3ewGwXB3ILW0oF5UA0R5jc=; b=HJ57RO5toTqNedWznJaDRVwTR4hpi7C3QhUp1aRRAR35vui20q7WF+TtZ3ZVsbnec9 X5KM/zhbAjjXChADa53YAjyk0v/hX+jAD2c+PcE6qqMB24y/85zbBsYMSOtA3wkloQ0K QiqhNpwBbJJX8NWaBUOk67p5F7KgesPuOKOpihANKJpXDDkglEE9RfrO6f0rQ1ZTgXnw pUh0QBR2Cu8oPAqUcK/g8ZJ2xPcM4LY5H7U7jayEGgzQ+75TjyWFIlzZJ4joqVq+rq9J 4vq7uHoCqlKsuikj94Ns73h4IzHrwMYoEObl2brFoEuCQcg6dHjpjErwo/LfKkWKMECF eT4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kcXj5UavjbJJYyS3UAY2ulwsfDg3jxgBXR3HTAxZiwqIKtPOcWjaa18eRHthAByx3y X-Received: by 10.223.129.196 with SMTP id 62mr6922156wra.43.1486716396248; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z134sm417399wmc.20.2017.02.10.00.46.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:46:35 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Keith Wiles Cc: dev@dpdk.org, iryzhov@nfware.com Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:46:35 +0100 Message-ID: <2782356.hAb1fhpyXq@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170209234233.63333-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> References: <20170209181450.58466-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> <20170209234233.63333-1-keith.wiles@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/11] moving away from coremask to corelist X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:46:36 -0000 Hi Keith, 2017-02-09 17:42, Keith Wiles: > The coremask option in DPDK is difficult to use and we should be > promoting the use of the corelist (-l) option. The patch series > adjusts the docs to use -l EAL option instead of the -c option. > > The patch series doc change only and is not required to be done > in 17.02 release, but should be added to the 17.05 release. > The -c option will be kept and not removed for now unless in the > future we decide to deprecate the code. > > v2 - Fix taskset back to using -c > > Keith Wiles (11): > doc/cryptodev: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/faq: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/freebsd: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/howto: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/linux: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/nics: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/prog_guide: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/testpmd: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/cryptoperf: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/xen: use corelist instead of coremask > doc/sample_app: use corelist instead of coremask In case you make new revisions, I think you can squash every patches in a single one. They are all doing the same thing in different files.