From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BABBA04B7; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:50:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B287C1DD2E; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:50:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B6D1DD03 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:50:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFDB58032F; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:50:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:50:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= LvNbUkJLvEfcFPtCRsnL8gsqN06060/hm74mHg1d2ik=; b=dpxHau3LmopVoZpO 3Xgfr1oIVEnuZrNM4Q2aVmD6dPTgdnGkScB4znixpOMqj1NJaA/TT2obpLpJtgoE 76Gn87NsyyFbswxDzdGwIicUrLdBQWL0OGAijgn/3x+COCr87GjWljxA9YddEmR8 qq0R9SsoxXtUDkC7J1gOkOVgQssgr4GWqPZxyOq4zaqeN6bZg7AJ3rU8YsainT8E s1K3yAsumqbwHnTyUK82KqMnC0v5c+h6K+e2svY83S9GanwkNJPL7O/37XyXB4Pa Vmy68H7aL7J++l++bmBuj4hHgdcJSyOulhwMKXpRbmjMOAvs6x1vrj4mkn0IPtHg XmW5VA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LvNbUkJLvEfcFPtCRsnL8gsqN06060/hm74mHg1d2 ik=; b=p65CAdu9xZ4A12z0YDX4OLIqgxySsNn6X8bdzGDtWvKAYn13vZbEuy5tP 7gUa76tiOp354K8Mvh9T0Izl3Lw86EdONvyhp9BJrm9Gde5n+JZtcdWsLTp07g6i br06tGYRcczfEScDql9cXcWEAACwqfOcwpKc8Tic/fZmgCnRUDX5QfkgVxu6zhlb 4YLC9dEIFikepMJ/CCMr8sX4cefz5J6ZpzqhZJmcQGumrMNvnzfwXzH/2cmV5MDG fu0LLm6YZUHxjyvum3bV89kj/aHvVNxwyxMyeHQ0X0C1VtOGVzC217B3FN9dHgyS LzLsT2UXIuUoHuklHLLzfhcl/OgKg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedriedugddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehm ohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeegle fghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeuieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddt fedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6AB3F3280065; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:50:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: guyk@marvell.com Cc: orika@mellanox.com, dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, smadarf@marvell.com, dovrat@marvell.com, ktraynor@redhat.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:50:35 +0200 Message-ID: <2783591.ICd8FJvocj@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200909120853.11715-2-guyk@marvell.com> References: <20200908123144.26444-3-guyk@marvell.com> <20200909120853.11715-1-guyk@marvell.com> <20200909120853.11715-2-guyk@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] examples/l3fwd-regex: add regex based l3fwd X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" (repeating question asked on v1 by mistake) 09/09/2020 14:08, guyk@marvell.com: > Add regex based l3fwd application > inline with normal l3fwd. only LPM is supported. The trend is to reduce the number of example applications. Do you think regex could be an option in the original l3fwd?