From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, pallavi.kadam@intel.com,
dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, navasile@linux.microsoft.com,
dmitrym@microsoft.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
lucp.at.work@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] eal/windows: fix pthreads macros return values
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27902224.8yUSzluuBG@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210412103744.13496-1-talshn@nvidia.com>
12/04/2021 12:37, Tal Shnaiderman:
> The macro definitions of the following pthread functions
> return incorrect values from the inner function return code.
>
> while pthread_barrier_init, pthread_barrier_destroy and
> pthread_cancel return 0 in a case of success and non zero (errno) value
> otherwise the shimming functions InitializeSynchronizationBarrier,
> DeleteSynchronizationBarrier and TerminateThread return FALSE (0)
> in a case of failure and TRUE(1) in a case of success.
>
> This issue was undetected as none of the functions return codes was
> checked until such check was added in commit 34cc55cce6b1 ("eal: fix
> race in control thread creation") exposing the issue by failing
> pthread_barrier_init and rte_eal_init on Windows as a result.
>
> The fix aligned the return value of the 3 function with the expected
> pthread API return values.
>
> Fixes: e8428a9d89f1 ("eal/windows: add some basic functions and macros")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v2:
> -fix unused value warning in MinGW-64 [DmitryK]
> -remove unneeded "fixes" comment [DavidM]
Applied, thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-12 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-10 19:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-11 21:00 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-12 7:59 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-12 8:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-12 10:03 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-12 10:07 ` David Marchand
2021-04-12 10:26 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-12 10:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-12 20:38 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27902224.8yUSzluuBG@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitrym@microsoft.com \
--cc=lucp.at.work@gmail.com \
--cc=navasile@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=talshn@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).