* [PATCH] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
@ 2024-01-26 13:21 Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-01 9:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Kolomeiets @ 2024-01-26 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas, aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, orika, mko-plv, ckm; +Cc: dev
"flow actions_update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
Flow rule #0 destroyed
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
---
.mailmap | 3 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 34 +++++++++++++++-
app/test-pmd/config.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++
app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 3 ++
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 6011526cae..44da31c1c2 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ Chintu Hetam <rometoroam@gmail.com>
Choonho Son <choonho.son@gmail.com>
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
+Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
Christian Maciocco <christian.maciocco@intel.com>
Christophe Fontaine <cfontain@redhat.com>
Christophe Grosse <christophe.grosse@6wind.com>
@@ -986,6 +987,7 @@ Mukesh Dua <mukesh.dua81@gmail.com>
Murphy Yang <murphyx.yang@intel.com>
Murthy NSSR <nidadavolu.murthy@caviumnetworks.com>
Muthurajan Jayakumar <muthurajan.jayakumar@intel.com>
+Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Nachiketa Prachanda <nprachan@brocade.com> <nprachan@vyatta.att-mail.com>
Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>
Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
@@ -1040,6 +1042,7 @@ Odi Assli <odia@nvidia.com>
Ognjen Joldzic <ognjen.joldzic@gmail.com>
Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>
Oleg Polyakov <olegp123@walla.co.il>
+Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Olga Shern <olgas@nvidia.com> <olgas@mellanox.com>
Olivier Gournet <ogournet@corp.free.fr>
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index f704319771..8249e4eb92 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -852,6 +852,10 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...]\n"
" Destroy specific flow rules.\n\n"
+ "flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}"
+ " actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]\n"
+ " Update a flow rule with new actions.\n\n"
+
"flow flush {port_id}\n"
" Destroy all flow rules.\n\n"
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 359c187b3c..0af8d13121 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ enum index {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ ACTIONS_UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
QUERY,
@@ -250,6 +251,7 @@ enum index {
VC_TUNNEL_SET,
VC_TUNNEL_MATCH,
VC_USER_ID,
+ VC_IS_USER_ID,
/* Dump arguments */
DUMP_ALL,
@@ -3084,6 +3086,7 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ ACTIONS_UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
LIST,
@@ -3888,6 +3891,17 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
.call = parse_destroy,
},
+ [ACTIONS_UPDATE] = {
+ .name = "actions_update",
+ .help = "update a flow rule with new actions",
+ .next = NEXT(NEXT_ENTRY(VC_IS_USER_ID, END),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(ACTIONS),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_RULE_ID),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_PORT_ID)),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.rule_id),
+ ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
[FLUSH] = {
.name = "flush",
.help = "destroy all flow rules",
@@ -4134,6 +4148,11 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.user_id)),
.call = parse_vc,
},
+ [VC_IS_USER_ID] = {
+ .name = "user_id",
+ .help = "rule identifier is user-id",
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
/* Validate/create pattern. */
[ITEM_PATTERN] = {
.name = "pattern",
@@ -8083,8 +8102,13 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
if (!out->command) {
if (ctx->curr != VALIDATE && ctx->curr != CREATE &&
ctx->curr != PATTERN_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
- ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE)
+ ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
+ ctx->curr != ACTIONS_UPDATE)
return -1;
+ if (ctx->curr == ACTIONS_UPDATE)
+ out->args.vc.pattern =
+ (void *)RTE_ALIGN_CEIL((uintptr_t)(out + 1),
+ sizeof(double));
if (sizeof(*out) > size)
return -1;
out->command = ctx->curr;
@@ -8156,6 +8180,9 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
ctx->object = out->args.vc.actions;
ctx->objmask = NULL;
return len;
+ case VC_IS_USER_ID:
+ out->args.vc.user_id = true;
+ return len;
default:
if (!token->priv)
return -1;
@@ -12713,6 +12740,11 @@ cmd_flow_parsed(const struct buffer *in)
in->args.destroy.rule,
in->args.destroy.is_user_id);
break;
+ case ACTIONS_UPDATE:
+ port_flow_actions_update(in->port, in->args.vc.rule_id,
+ in->args.vc.actions,
+ in->args.vc.user_id);
+ break;
case FLUSH:
port_flow_flush(in->port);
break;
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index cad7537bc6..09d44908b0 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -3696,6 +3696,49 @@ port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
return ret;
}
+/** Update a flow rule with new actions. */
+int
+port_flow_actions_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule_id,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id)
+{
+ struct rte_port *port;
+ struct port_flow **flow_list;
+
+ if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN) ||
+ port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ port = &ports[port_id];
+ flow_list = &port->flow_list;
+ while (*flow_list) {
+ struct port_flow *flow = *flow_list;
+ struct rte_flow_error error;
+
+ if (rule_id != (is_user_id ? flow->user_id : flow->id)) {
+ flow_list = &flow->next;
+ continue;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Poisoning to make sure PMDs update it in case
+ * of error.
+ */
+ memset(&error, 0x33, sizeof(error));
+ if (rte_flow_actions_update(port_id, flow->flow, actions,
+ &error))
+ return port_flow_complain(&error);
+ if (is_user_id)
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64" updated with new actions,"
+ " user-id 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
+ flow->id, flow->user_id);
+ else
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64
+ " updated with new actions\n",
+ flow->id);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ printf("Failed to find flow %"PRIu32"\n", rule_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
/** Remove all flow rules. */
int
port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
index 9b10a9ea1c..7ff76658e7 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
@@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ void update_age_action_context(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
int mcast_addr_pool_destroy(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
bool is_user_id);
+int port_flow_actions_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
+ bool is_user_id);
int port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_dump(portid_t port_id, bool dump_all,
uint64_t rule, const char *file_name,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index ab18a80b30..274cb96724 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3046,6 +3046,11 @@ following sections.
flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...] [user_id]
+- Update a flow rule with new actions::
+
+ flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
- Destroy all flow rules::
flow flush {port_id}
@@ -4235,6 +4240,45 @@ Non-existent rule IDs are ignored::
Flow rule #0 destroyed
testpmd>
+Updating flow rules with new actions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+``flow actions_update`` updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a new
+action list by making a call to ``rte_flow_actions_update()``::
+
+ flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
+If successful, it will show::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions
+
+Or if ``user_id`` flag is provided::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions, user-id [...]
+
+If a flow rule can not be found::
+
+ Failed to find flow [...]
+
+Otherwise it will show the usual error message of the form::
+
+ Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
+
+Optional ``user_id`` is a flag that signifies the rule ID is the one provided
+by the user at creation.
+
+Action list is identical to the one described for the ``flow create``.
+
+Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule::
+
+ testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
+ Flow rule #0 created
+ testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
+ Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
+ testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
+ Flow rule #0 destroyed
+
Enqueueing destruction of flow rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-01-26 13:21 [PATCH] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions Oleksandr Kolomeiets
@ 2024-02-01 9:59 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-02 9:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-22 9:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Kolomeiets @ 2024-02-01 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas, aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, orika, mko-plv, ckm; +Cc: dev
"flow actions_update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
Flow rule #0 destroyed
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
---
v2:
* No changes.
---
.mailmap | 3 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 34 +++++++++++++++-
app/test-pmd/config.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++
app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 3 ++
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 6011526cae..44da31c1c2 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ Chintu Hetam <rometoroam@gmail.com>
Choonho Son <choonho.son@gmail.com>
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
+Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
Christian Maciocco <christian.maciocco@intel.com>
Christophe Fontaine <cfontain@redhat.com>
Christophe Grosse <christophe.grosse@6wind.com>
@@ -986,6 +987,7 @@ Mukesh Dua <mukesh.dua81@gmail.com>
Murphy Yang <murphyx.yang@intel.com>
Murthy NSSR <nidadavolu.murthy@caviumnetworks.com>
Muthurajan Jayakumar <muthurajan.jayakumar@intel.com>
+Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Nachiketa Prachanda <nprachan@brocade.com> <nprachan@vyatta.att-mail.com>
Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>
Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
@@ -1040,6 +1042,7 @@ Odi Assli <odia@nvidia.com>
Ognjen Joldzic <ognjen.joldzic@gmail.com>
Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>
Oleg Polyakov <olegp123@walla.co.il>
+Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Olga Shern <olgas@nvidia.com> <olgas@mellanox.com>
Olivier Gournet <ogournet@corp.free.fr>
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index f704319771..8249e4eb92 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -852,6 +852,10 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...]\n"
" Destroy specific flow rules.\n\n"
+ "flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}"
+ " actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]\n"
+ " Update a flow rule with new actions.\n\n"
+
"flow flush {port_id}\n"
" Destroy all flow rules.\n\n"
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 359c187b3c..0af8d13121 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ enum index {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ ACTIONS_UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
QUERY,
@@ -250,6 +251,7 @@ enum index {
VC_TUNNEL_SET,
VC_TUNNEL_MATCH,
VC_USER_ID,
+ VC_IS_USER_ID,
/* Dump arguments */
DUMP_ALL,
@@ -3084,6 +3086,7 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ ACTIONS_UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
LIST,
@@ -3888,6 +3891,17 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
.call = parse_destroy,
},
+ [ACTIONS_UPDATE] = {
+ .name = "actions_update",
+ .help = "update a flow rule with new actions",
+ .next = NEXT(NEXT_ENTRY(VC_IS_USER_ID, END),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(ACTIONS),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_RULE_ID),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_PORT_ID)),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.rule_id),
+ ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
[FLUSH] = {
.name = "flush",
.help = "destroy all flow rules",
@@ -4134,6 +4148,11 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.user_id)),
.call = parse_vc,
},
+ [VC_IS_USER_ID] = {
+ .name = "user_id",
+ .help = "rule identifier is user-id",
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
/* Validate/create pattern. */
[ITEM_PATTERN] = {
.name = "pattern",
@@ -8083,8 +8102,13 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
if (!out->command) {
if (ctx->curr != VALIDATE && ctx->curr != CREATE &&
ctx->curr != PATTERN_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
- ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE)
+ ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
+ ctx->curr != ACTIONS_UPDATE)
return -1;
+ if (ctx->curr == ACTIONS_UPDATE)
+ out->args.vc.pattern =
+ (void *)RTE_ALIGN_CEIL((uintptr_t)(out + 1),
+ sizeof(double));
if (sizeof(*out) > size)
return -1;
out->command = ctx->curr;
@@ -8156,6 +8180,9 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
ctx->object = out->args.vc.actions;
ctx->objmask = NULL;
return len;
+ case VC_IS_USER_ID:
+ out->args.vc.user_id = true;
+ return len;
default:
if (!token->priv)
return -1;
@@ -12713,6 +12740,11 @@ cmd_flow_parsed(const struct buffer *in)
in->args.destroy.rule,
in->args.destroy.is_user_id);
break;
+ case ACTIONS_UPDATE:
+ port_flow_actions_update(in->port, in->args.vc.rule_id,
+ in->args.vc.actions,
+ in->args.vc.user_id);
+ break;
case FLUSH:
port_flow_flush(in->port);
break;
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index cad7537bc6..09d44908b0 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -3696,6 +3696,49 @@ port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
return ret;
}
+/** Update a flow rule with new actions. */
+int
+port_flow_actions_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule_id,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id)
+{
+ struct rte_port *port;
+ struct port_flow **flow_list;
+
+ if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN) ||
+ port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ port = &ports[port_id];
+ flow_list = &port->flow_list;
+ while (*flow_list) {
+ struct port_flow *flow = *flow_list;
+ struct rte_flow_error error;
+
+ if (rule_id != (is_user_id ? flow->user_id : flow->id)) {
+ flow_list = &flow->next;
+ continue;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Poisoning to make sure PMDs update it in case
+ * of error.
+ */
+ memset(&error, 0x33, sizeof(error));
+ if (rte_flow_actions_update(port_id, flow->flow, actions,
+ &error))
+ return port_flow_complain(&error);
+ if (is_user_id)
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64" updated with new actions,"
+ " user-id 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
+ flow->id, flow->user_id);
+ else
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64
+ " updated with new actions\n",
+ flow->id);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ printf("Failed to find flow %"PRIu32"\n", rule_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
/** Remove all flow rules. */
int
port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
index 9b10a9ea1c..7ff76658e7 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
@@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ void update_age_action_context(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
int mcast_addr_pool_destroy(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
bool is_user_id);
+int port_flow_actions_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
+ bool is_user_id);
int port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_dump(portid_t port_id, bool dump_all,
uint64_t rule, const char *file_name,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index ab18a80b30..274cb96724 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3046,6 +3046,11 @@ following sections.
flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...] [user_id]
+- Update a flow rule with new actions::
+
+ flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
- Destroy all flow rules::
flow flush {port_id}
@@ -4235,6 +4240,45 @@ Non-existent rule IDs are ignored::
Flow rule #0 destroyed
testpmd>
+Updating flow rules with new actions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+``flow actions_update`` updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a new
+action list by making a call to ``rte_flow_actions_update()``::
+
+ flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
+If successful, it will show::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions
+
+Or if ``user_id`` flag is provided::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions, user-id [...]
+
+If a flow rule can not be found::
+
+ Failed to find flow [...]
+
+Otherwise it will show the usual error message of the form::
+
+ Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
+
+Optional ``user_id`` is a flag that signifies the rule ID is the one provided
+by the user at creation.
+
+Action list is identical to the one described for the ``flow create``.
+
+Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule::
+
+ testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
+ Flow rule #0 created
+ testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
+ Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
+ testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
+ Flow rule #0 destroyed
+
Enqueueing destruction of flow rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-01 9:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
@ 2024-02-02 9:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-05 19:18 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-22 9:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2024-02-02 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mko-plv, ckm, Oleksandr Kolomeiets
Cc: aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, dev, Ori Kam, Dariusz Sosnowski
01/02/2024 10:59, Oleksandr Kolomeiets:
> "flow actions_update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
> new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
>
> flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
> actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
>
> Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
>
> testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
> Flow rule #0 created
> testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
> Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
> testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
> Flow rule #0 destroyed
Why not a simple "flow update" command name?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-02 9:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2024-02-05 19:18 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-12 8:37 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dariusz Sosnowski @ 2024-02-05 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL),
mko-plv, ckm, Oleksandr Kolomeiets
Cc: aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, dev, Ori Kam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 10:55
> To: mko-plv@napatech.com; ckm@napatech.com; Oleksandr Kolomeiets
> <okl-plv@napatech.com>
> Cc: aman.deep.singh@intel.com; yuying.zhang@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org;
> Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
>
> 01/02/2024 10:59, Oleksandr Kolomeiets:
> > "flow actions_update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with
> > a new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
> >
> > flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
> > actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
> >
> > Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
> >
> > testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
> > Flow rule #0 created
> > testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
> > Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
> > testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
> > Flow rule #0 destroyed
>
> Why not a simple "flow update" command name?
+1. This would also make it consistent with async version of this command - "flow queue {port_id} update ...".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-05 19:18 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
@ 2024-02-12 8:37 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-21 10:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Kolomeiets @ 2024-02-12 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dariusz Sosnowski, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL),
Mykola Kostenok, Christian Koue Muf
Cc: aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, dev, Ori Kam
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2343 bytes --]
Thank you for the review.
Indeed, shortening the command from "flow actions_update" to "flow update" seems more natural.
However, note that the command updates only the actions of a flow rule and leaves all other parameters unchanged.
My concern is that in the future there can be some "flow pattern_update" command, thus making "flow update" command ambiguous.
Also, the name is consistent with the underlying rte_flow_actions_update() function.
With that in mind, please clarify if the name should still be changed.
________________________________
From: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 9:18 PM
To: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas@monjalon.net>; Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>; Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>; Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Cc: aman.deep.singh@intel.com <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; yuying.zhang@intel.com <yuying.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 10:55
> To: mko-plv@napatech.com; ckm@napatech.com; Oleksandr Kolomeiets
> <okl-plv@napatech.com>
> Cc: aman.deep.singh@intel.com; yuying.zhang@intel.com; dev@dpdk.org;
> Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
>
> 01/02/2024 10:59, Oleksandr Kolomeiets:
> > "flow actions_update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with
> > a new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
> >
> > flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
> > actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
> >
> > Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
> >
> > testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
> > Flow rule #0 created
> > testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
> > Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
> > testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
> > Flow rule #0 destroyed
>
> Why not a simple "flow update" command name?
+1. This would also make it consistent with async version of this command - "flow queue {port_id} update ...".
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3730 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-12 8:37 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
@ 2024-02-21 10:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2024-02-21 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleksandr Kolomeiets
Cc: Dariusz Sosnowski, Mykola Kostenok, Christian Koue Muf, dev,
aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, dev, Ori Kam
12/02/2024 09:37, Oleksandr Kolomeiets:
> From: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > 01/02/2024 10:59, Oleksandr Kolomeiets:
> > > > "flow actions_update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with
> > > >
> > > > a new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
> > > > flow actions_update {port_id} {rule_id}
> > > >
> > > > actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
> > > >
> > > > Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
> > > > testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop /
> > > > end
> > > > Flow rule #0 created
> > > > testpmd> flow actions_update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
> > > > Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
> > > > testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
> > > > Flow rule #0 destroyed
> > >
> > > Why not a simple "flow update" command name?
> >
> > +1. This would also make it consistent with async version of this command
> > - "flow queue {port_id} update ...".
>
> Indeed, shortening the command from "flow actions_update" to "flow update" seems more natural.
> However, note that the command updates only the actions of a flow rule and leaves all other parameters unchanged.
> My concern is that in the future there can be some "flow pattern_update" command, thus making "flow update" command ambiguous.
> Also, the name is consistent with the underlying rte_flow_actions_update() function.
> With that in mind, please clarify if the name should still be changed.
If a function is added for pattern update, we could still implement it
with the same command prefix "flow update" and call functions as appropriate.
So yes I still think the command should be "flow update".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-01 9:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-02 9:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2024-02-22 9:04 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-23 4:19 ` [PATCH v4] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Kolomeiets @ 2024-02-22 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas, aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, orika, mko-plv, ckm; +Cc: dev
"flow update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
Flow rule #0 destroyed
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
---
v3:
* Renamed "flow actions_update" command to "flow update".
v2:
* No changes.
---
.mailmap | 3 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 33 +++++++++++++++-
app/test-pmd/config.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++
app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 2 +
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 12d2875641..c1e7aa9ae1 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ Chintu Hetam <rometoroam@gmail.com>
Choonho Son <choonho.son@gmail.com>
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
+Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
Christian Maciocco <christian.maciocco@intel.com>
Christophe Fontaine <cfontain@redhat.com>
Christophe Grosse <christophe.grosse@6wind.com>
@@ -992,6 +993,7 @@ Mukesh Dua <mukesh.dua81@gmail.com>
Murphy Yang <murphyx.yang@intel.com>
Murthy NSSR <nidadavolu.murthy@caviumnetworks.com>
Muthurajan Jayakumar <muthurajan.jayakumar@intel.com>
+Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Nachiketa Prachanda <nprachan@brocade.com> <nprachan@vyatta.att-mail.com>
Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>
Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
@@ -1046,6 +1048,7 @@ Odi Assli <odia@nvidia.com>
Ognjen Joldzic <ognjen.joldzic@gmail.com>
Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>
Oleg Polyakov <olegp123@walla.co.il>
+Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Olga Shern <olgas@nvidia.com> <olgas@mellanox.com>
Olivier Gournet <ogournet@corp.free.fr>
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 566057caa5..f521a1fe9e 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -851,6 +851,10 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...]\n"
" Destroy specific flow rules.\n\n"
+ "flow update {port_id} {rule_id}"
+ " actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]\n"
+ " Update a flow rule with new actions.\n\n"
+
"flow flush {port_id}\n"
" Destroy all flow rules.\n\n"
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 8e5eb41d71..d9d261ebd2 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ enum index {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
QUERY,
@@ -260,6 +261,7 @@ enum index {
VC_TUNNEL_SET,
VC_TUNNEL_MATCH,
VC_USER_ID,
+ VC_IS_USER_ID,
/* Dump arguments */
DUMP_ALL,
@@ -3200,6 +3202,7 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
LIST,
@@ -4065,6 +4068,17 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
.call = parse_destroy,
},
+ [UPDATE] = {
+ .name = "update",
+ .help = "update a flow rule with new actions",
+ .next = NEXT(NEXT_ENTRY(VC_IS_USER_ID, END),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(ACTIONS),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_RULE_ID),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_PORT_ID)),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.rule_id),
+ ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
[FLUSH] = {
.name = "flush",
.help = "destroy all flow rules",
@@ -4311,6 +4325,11 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.user_id)),
.call = parse_vc,
},
+ [VC_IS_USER_ID] = {
+ .name = "user_id",
+ .help = "rule identifier is user-id",
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
/* Validate/create pattern. */
[ITEM_PATTERN] = {
.name = "pattern",
@@ -8450,8 +8469,13 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
if (!out->command) {
if (ctx->curr != VALIDATE && ctx->curr != CREATE &&
ctx->curr != PATTERN_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
- ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE)
+ ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
+ ctx->curr != UPDATE)
return -1;
+ if (ctx->curr == UPDATE)
+ out->args.vc.pattern =
+ (void *)RTE_ALIGN_CEIL((uintptr_t)(out + 1),
+ sizeof(double));
if (sizeof(*out) > size)
return -1;
out->command = ctx->curr;
@@ -8523,6 +8547,9 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
ctx->object = out->args.vc.actions;
ctx->objmask = NULL;
return len;
+ case VC_IS_USER_ID:
+ out->args.vc.user_id = true;
+ return len;
default:
if (!token->priv)
return -1;
@@ -13256,6 +13283,10 @@ cmd_flow_parsed(const struct buffer *in)
in->args.destroy.rule,
in->args.destroy.is_user_id);
break;
+ case UPDATE:
+ port_flow_update(in->port, in->args.vc.rule_id,
+ in->args.vc.actions, in->args.vc.user_id);
+ break;
case FLUSH:
port_flow_flush(in->port);
break;
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 08d7d0e2f8..cd2a436cd7 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -3829,6 +3829,49 @@ port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
return ret;
}
+/** Update a flow rule with new actions. */
+int
+port_flow_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule_id,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id)
+{
+ struct rte_port *port;
+ struct port_flow **flow_list;
+
+ if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN) ||
+ port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ port = &ports[port_id];
+ flow_list = &port->flow_list;
+ while (*flow_list) {
+ struct port_flow *flow = *flow_list;
+ struct rte_flow_error error;
+
+ if (rule_id != (is_user_id ? flow->user_id : flow->id)) {
+ flow_list = &flow->next;
+ continue;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Poisoning to make sure PMDs update it in case
+ * of error.
+ */
+ memset(&error, 0x33, sizeof(error));
+ if (rte_flow_actions_update(port_id, flow->flow, actions,
+ &error))
+ return port_flow_complain(&error);
+ if (is_user_id)
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64" updated with new actions,"
+ " user-id 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
+ flow->id, flow->user_id);
+ else
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64
+ " updated with new actions\n",
+ flow->id);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ printf("Failed to find flow %"PRIu32"\n", rule_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
/** Remove all flow rules. */
int
port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
index 467ef3a8ab..55df12033a 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
@@ -1043,6 +1043,8 @@ void update_age_action_context(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
int mcast_addr_pool_destroy(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
bool is_user_id);
+int port_flow_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id);
int port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_dump(portid_t port_id, bool dump_all,
uint64_t rule, const char *file_name,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index 9f3949667f..1771115857 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3057,6 +3057,11 @@ following sections.
flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...] [user_id]
+- Update a flow rule with new actions::
+
+ flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
- Destroy all flow rules::
flow flush {port_id}
@@ -4275,6 +4280,45 @@ Non-existent rule IDs are ignored::
Flow rule #0 destroyed
testpmd>
+Updating flow rules with new actions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+``flow update`` updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a new action
+list by making a call to ``rte_flow_actions_update()``::
+
+ flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
+If successful, it will show::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions
+
+Or if ``user_id`` flag is provided::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions, user-id [...]
+
+If a flow rule can not be found::
+
+ Failed to find flow [...]
+
+Otherwise it will show the usual error message of the form::
+
+ Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
+
+Optional ``user_id`` is a flag that signifies the rule ID is the one provided
+by the user at creation.
+
+Action list is identical to the one described for the ``flow create``.
+
+Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule::
+
+ testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
+ Flow rule #0 created
+ testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
+ Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
+ testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
+ Flow rule #0 destroyed
+
Enqueueing destruction of flow rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-22 9:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
@ 2024-02-23 4:19 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-28 17:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-29 2:15 ` [PATCH v5] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Kolomeiets @ 2024-02-23 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas, aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, orika, mko-plv, ckm; +Cc: dev
"flow update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
Flow rule #0 destroyed
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
---
v4:
* No changes.
v3:
* Renamed "flow actions_update" command to "flow update".
v2:
* No changes.
---
.mailmap | 3 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 33 +++++++++++++++-
app/test-pmd/config.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++
app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 2 +
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 12d2875641..c1e7aa9ae1 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ Chintu Hetam <rometoroam@gmail.com>
Choonho Son <choonho.son@gmail.com>
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
+Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
Christian Maciocco <christian.maciocco@intel.com>
Christophe Fontaine <cfontain@redhat.com>
Christophe Grosse <christophe.grosse@6wind.com>
@@ -992,6 +993,7 @@ Mukesh Dua <mukesh.dua81@gmail.com>
Murphy Yang <murphyx.yang@intel.com>
Murthy NSSR <nidadavolu.murthy@caviumnetworks.com>
Muthurajan Jayakumar <muthurajan.jayakumar@intel.com>
+Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Nachiketa Prachanda <nprachan@brocade.com> <nprachan@vyatta.att-mail.com>
Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>
Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
@@ -1046,6 +1048,7 @@ Odi Assli <odia@nvidia.com>
Ognjen Joldzic <ognjen.joldzic@gmail.com>
Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>
Oleg Polyakov <olegp123@walla.co.il>
+Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Olga Shern <olgas@nvidia.com> <olgas@mellanox.com>
Olivier Gournet <ogournet@corp.free.fr>
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 566057caa5..f521a1fe9e 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -851,6 +851,10 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...]\n"
" Destroy specific flow rules.\n\n"
+ "flow update {port_id} {rule_id}"
+ " actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]\n"
+ " Update a flow rule with new actions.\n\n"
+
"flow flush {port_id}\n"
" Destroy all flow rules.\n\n"
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 8e5eb41d71..d9d261ebd2 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ enum index {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
QUERY,
@@ -260,6 +261,7 @@ enum index {
VC_TUNNEL_SET,
VC_TUNNEL_MATCH,
VC_USER_ID,
+ VC_IS_USER_ID,
/* Dump arguments */
DUMP_ALL,
@@ -3200,6 +3202,7 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
LIST,
@@ -4065,6 +4068,17 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
.call = parse_destroy,
},
+ [UPDATE] = {
+ .name = "update",
+ .help = "update a flow rule with new actions",
+ .next = NEXT(NEXT_ENTRY(VC_IS_USER_ID, END),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(ACTIONS),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_RULE_ID),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_PORT_ID)),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.rule_id),
+ ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
[FLUSH] = {
.name = "flush",
.help = "destroy all flow rules",
@@ -4311,6 +4325,11 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.user_id)),
.call = parse_vc,
},
+ [VC_IS_USER_ID] = {
+ .name = "user_id",
+ .help = "rule identifier is user-id",
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
/* Validate/create pattern. */
[ITEM_PATTERN] = {
.name = "pattern",
@@ -8450,8 +8469,13 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
if (!out->command) {
if (ctx->curr != VALIDATE && ctx->curr != CREATE &&
ctx->curr != PATTERN_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
- ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE)
+ ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
+ ctx->curr != UPDATE)
return -1;
+ if (ctx->curr == UPDATE)
+ out->args.vc.pattern =
+ (void *)RTE_ALIGN_CEIL((uintptr_t)(out + 1),
+ sizeof(double));
if (sizeof(*out) > size)
return -1;
out->command = ctx->curr;
@@ -8523,6 +8547,9 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
ctx->object = out->args.vc.actions;
ctx->objmask = NULL;
return len;
+ case VC_IS_USER_ID:
+ out->args.vc.user_id = true;
+ return len;
default:
if (!token->priv)
return -1;
@@ -13256,6 +13283,10 @@ cmd_flow_parsed(const struct buffer *in)
in->args.destroy.rule,
in->args.destroy.is_user_id);
break;
+ case UPDATE:
+ port_flow_update(in->port, in->args.vc.rule_id,
+ in->args.vc.actions, in->args.vc.user_id);
+ break;
case FLUSH:
port_flow_flush(in->port);
break;
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 08d7d0e2f8..cd2a436cd7 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -3829,6 +3829,49 @@ port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
return ret;
}
+/** Update a flow rule with new actions. */
+int
+port_flow_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule_id,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id)
+{
+ struct rte_port *port;
+ struct port_flow **flow_list;
+
+ if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN) ||
+ port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ port = &ports[port_id];
+ flow_list = &port->flow_list;
+ while (*flow_list) {
+ struct port_flow *flow = *flow_list;
+ struct rte_flow_error error;
+
+ if (rule_id != (is_user_id ? flow->user_id : flow->id)) {
+ flow_list = &flow->next;
+ continue;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Poisoning to make sure PMDs update it in case
+ * of error.
+ */
+ memset(&error, 0x33, sizeof(error));
+ if (rte_flow_actions_update(port_id, flow->flow, actions,
+ &error))
+ return port_flow_complain(&error);
+ if (is_user_id)
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64" updated with new actions,"
+ " user-id 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
+ flow->id, flow->user_id);
+ else
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64
+ " updated with new actions\n",
+ flow->id);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ printf("Failed to find flow %"PRIu32"\n", rule_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
/** Remove all flow rules. */
int
port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
index 467ef3a8ab..55df12033a 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
@@ -1043,6 +1043,8 @@ void update_age_action_context(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
int mcast_addr_pool_destroy(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
bool is_user_id);
+int port_flow_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id);
int port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_dump(portid_t port_id, bool dump_all,
uint64_t rule, const char *file_name,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index 9f3949667f..1771115857 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3057,6 +3057,11 @@ following sections.
flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...] [user_id]
+- Update a flow rule with new actions::
+
+ flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
- Destroy all flow rules::
flow flush {port_id}
@@ -4275,6 +4280,45 @@ Non-existent rule IDs are ignored::
Flow rule #0 destroyed
testpmd>
+Updating flow rules with new actions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+``flow update`` updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a new action
+list by making a call to ``rte_flow_actions_update()``::
+
+ flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
+If successful, it will show::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions
+
+Or if ``user_id`` flag is provided::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions, user-id [...]
+
+If a flow rule can not be found::
+
+ Failed to find flow [...]
+
+Otherwise it will show the usual error message of the form::
+
+ Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
+
+Optional ``user_id`` is a flag that signifies the rule ID is the one provided
+by the user at creation.
+
+Action list is identical to the one described for the ``flow create``.
+
+Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule::
+
+ testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
+ Flow rule #0 created
+ testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
+ Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
+ testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
+ Flow rule #0 destroyed
+
Enqueueing destruction of flow rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-23 4:19 ` [PATCH v4] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
@ 2024-02-28 17:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-29 2:15 ` [PATCH v5] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2024-02-28 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleksandr Kolomeiets, thomas, aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang,
orika, mko-plv, ckm
Cc: dev
On 2/23/2024 4:19 AM, Oleksandr Kolomeiets wrote:
> "flow update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
> new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
>
> flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
> actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
>
> Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
>
> testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
> Flow rule #0 created
> testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
> Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
> testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
> Flow rule #0 destroyed
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
>
Patch looks good to me.
@Ori, @Thomas, do you have any comment, if not I will proceed with the
patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-23 4:19 ` [PATCH v4] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-28 17:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2024-02-29 2:15 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-29 14:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Oleksandr Kolomeiets @ 2024-02-29 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas, aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang, orika, mko-plv, ckm; +Cc: dev
"flow update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
Flow rule #0 destroyed
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
---
v5:
* No changes.
v4:
* No changes.
v3:
* Renamed "flow actions_update" command to "flow update".
v2:
* No changes.
---
.mailmap | 3 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 4 ++
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 33 +++++++++++++++-
app/test-pmd/config.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++
app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 2 +
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 58cca13ef6..157ccab909 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ Chintu Hetam <rometoroam@gmail.com>
Choonho Son <choonho.son@gmail.com>
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
+Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
Christian Maciocco <christian.maciocco@intel.com>
Christophe Fontaine <cfontain@redhat.com>
Christophe Grosse <christophe.grosse@6wind.com>
@@ -993,6 +994,7 @@ Mukesh Dua <mukesh.dua81@gmail.com>
Murphy Yang <murphyx.yang@intel.com>
Murthy NSSR <nidadavolu.murthy@caviumnetworks.com>
Muthurajan Jayakumar <muthurajan.jayakumar@intel.com>
+Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
Nachiketa Prachanda <nprachan@brocade.com> <nprachan@vyatta.att-mail.com>
Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>
Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
@@ -1047,6 +1049,7 @@ Odi Assli <odia@nvidia.com>
Ognjen Joldzic <ognjen.joldzic@gmail.com>
Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl@arm.com>
Oleg Polyakov <olegp123@walla.co.il>
+Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
Olga Shern <olgas@nvidia.com> <olgas@mellanox.com>
Olivier Gournet <ogournet@corp.free.fr>
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 566057caa5..f521a1fe9e 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -851,6 +851,10 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
"flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...]\n"
" Destroy specific flow rules.\n\n"
+ "flow update {port_id} {rule_id}"
+ " actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]\n"
+ " Update a flow rule with new actions.\n\n"
+
"flow flush {port_id}\n"
" Destroy all flow rules.\n\n"
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index f69516faf2..5f761903c1 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ enum index {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
QUERY,
@@ -260,6 +261,7 @@ enum index {
VC_TUNNEL_SET,
VC_TUNNEL_MATCH,
VC_USER_ID,
+ VC_IS_USER_ID,
/* Dump arguments */
DUMP_ALL,
@@ -3209,6 +3211,7 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
VALIDATE,
CREATE,
DESTROY,
+ UPDATE,
FLUSH,
DUMP,
LIST,
@@ -4074,6 +4077,17 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
.call = parse_destroy,
},
+ [UPDATE] = {
+ .name = "update",
+ .help = "update a flow rule with new actions",
+ .next = NEXT(NEXT_ENTRY(VC_IS_USER_ID, END),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(ACTIONS),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_RULE_ID),
+ NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_PORT_ID)),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.rule_id),
+ ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, port)),
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
[FLUSH] = {
.name = "flush",
.help = "destroy all flow rules",
@@ -4320,6 +4334,11 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct buffer, args.vc.user_id)),
.call = parse_vc,
},
+ [VC_IS_USER_ID] = {
+ .name = "user_id",
+ .help = "rule identifier is user-id",
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
/* Validate/create pattern. */
[ITEM_PATTERN] = {
.name = "pattern",
@@ -8483,8 +8502,13 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
if (!out->command) {
if (ctx->curr != VALIDATE && ctx->curr != CREATE &&
ctx->curr != PATTERN_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
- ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE)
+ ctx->curr != ACTIONS_TEMPLATE_CREATE &&
+ ctx->curr != UPDATE)
return -1;
+ if (ctx->curr == UPDATE)
+ out->args.vc.pattern =
+ (void *)RTE_ALIGN_CEIL((uintptr_t)(out + 1),
+ sizeof(double));
if (sizeof(*out) > size)
return -1;
out->command = ctx->curr;
@@ -8556,6 +8580,9 @@ parse_vc(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
ctx->object = out->args.vc.actions;
ctx->objmask = NULL;
return len;
+ case VC_IS_USER_ID:
+ out->args.vc.user_id = true;
+ return len;
default:
if (!token->priv)
return -1;
@@ -13289,6 +13316,10 @@ cmd_flow_parsed(const struct buffer *in)
in->args.destroy.rule,
in->args.destroy.is_user_id);
break;
+ case UPDATE:
+ port_flow_update(in->port, in->args.vc.rule_id,
+ in->args.vc.actions, in->args.vc.user_id);
+ break;
case FLUSH:
port_flow_flush(in->port);
break;
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 08d7d0e2f8..cd2a436cd7 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -3829,6 +3829,49 @@ port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
return ret;
}
+/** Update a flow rule with new actions. */
+int
+port_flow_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule_id,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id)
+{
+ struct rte_port *port;
+ struct port_flow **flow_list;
+
+ if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN) ||
+ port_id == (portid_t)RTE_PORT_ALL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ port = &ports[port_id];
+ flow_list = &port->flow_list;
+ while (*flow_list) {
+ struct port_flow *flow = *flow_list;
+ struct rte_flow_error error;
+
+ if (rule_id != (is_user_id ? flow->user_id : flow->id)) {
+ flow_list = &flow->next;
+ continue;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Poisoning to make sure PMDs update it in case
+ * of error.
+ */
+ memset(&error, 0x33, sizeof(error));
+ if (rte_flow_actions_update(port_id, flow->flow, actions,
+ &error))
+ return port_flow_complain(&error);
+ if (is_user_id)
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64" updated with new actions,"
+ " user-id 0x%"PRIx64"\n",
+ flow->id, flow->user_id);
+ else
+ printf("Flow rule #%"PRIu64
+ " updated with new actions\n",
+ flow->id);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ printf("Failed to find flow %"PRIu32"\n", rule_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
/** Remove all flow rules. */
int
port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
index 467ef3a8ab..55df12033a 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
@@ -1043,6 +1043,8 @@ void update_age_action_context(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
int mcast_addr_pool_destroy(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_destroy(portid_t port_id, uint32_t n, const uint64_t *rule,
bool is_user_id);
+int port_flow_update(portid_t port_id, uint32_t rule,
+ const struct rte_flow_action *actions, bool is_user_id);
int port_flow_flush(portid_t port_id);
int port_flow_dump(portid_t port_id, bool dump_all,
uint64_t rule, const char *file_name,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index d837aa797f..2fbf9220d8 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -3057,6 +3057,11 @@ following sections.
flow destroy {port_id} rule {rule_id} [...] [user_id]
+- Update a flow rule with new actions::
+
+ flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
- Destroy all flow rules::
flow flush {port_id}
@@ -4278,6 +4283,45 @@ Non-existent rule IDs are ignored::
Flow rule #0 destroyed
testpmd>
+Updating flow rules with new actions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+``flow update`` updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a new action
+list by making a call to ``rte_flow_actions_update()``::
+
+ flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
+ actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
+
+If successful, it will show::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions
+
+Or if ``user_id`` flag is provided::
+
+ Flow rule #[...] updated with new actions, user-id [...]
+
+If a flow rule can not be found::
+
+ Failed to find flow [...]
+
+Otherwise it will show the usual error message of the form::
+
+ Caught error type [...] ([...]): [...]
+
+Optional ``user_id`` is a flag that signifies the rule ID is the one provided
+by the user at creation.
+
+Action list is identical to the one described for the ``flow create``.
+
+Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule::
+
+ testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
+ Flow rule #0 created
+ testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
+ Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
+ testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
+ Flow rule #0 destroyed
+
Enqueueing destruction of flow rules
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions
2024-02-29 2:15 ` [PATCH v5] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
@ 2024-02-29 14:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2024-02-29 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleksandr Kolomeiets, thomas, aman.deep.singh, yuying.zhang,
orika, mko-plv, ckm
Cc: dev
On 2/29/2024 2:15 AM, Oleksandr Kolomeiets wrote:
> "flow update" updates a flow rule specified by a rule ID with a
> new action list by making a call to "rte_flow_actions_update()":
>
> flow update {port_id} {rule_id}
> actions {action} [/ {action} [...]] / end [user_id]
>
> Creating, updating and destroying a flow rule:
>
> testpmd> flow create 0 group 1 pattern eth / end actions drop / end
> Flow rule #0 created
> testpmd> flow update 0 0 actions queue index 1 / end
> Flow rule #0 updated with new actions
> testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
> Flow rule #0 destroyed
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kolomeiets <okl-plv@napatech.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv@napatech.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Koue Muf <ckm@napatech.com>
>
Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-29 14:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-26 13:21 [PATCH] app/testpmd: support updating flow rule actions Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-01 9:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-02 9:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-05 19:18 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-12 8:37 ` Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-21 10:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-22 9:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-23 4:19 ` [PATCH v4] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-28 17:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-29 2:15 ` [PATCH v5] " Oleksandr Kolomeiets
2024-02-29 14:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).