From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BA368C3 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:38:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q58so3736535wes.40 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 04:39:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=G/sfYO70uPJStk5hr4w4UDgjfNFKHEqKi8oz2pGry+c=; b=V0WGwRugIV25yYrHRC2jEsmun70OOgVaOEZt5jqtUSqIsj3nY2JnYhBhI29mCp4b6N Cw7YHlSUfniaA3WIxJeGJMTiql9q/f0eIwhyPWK8oIE4ThLpqD9KHIKkXcdWlpTgE6Zz RnOnPGIomnkYtNgJbfAZDXZeke+SpnyOhrk7acA9sSywfoaOISnFgLn4OaHGi0I2iPKb jn9Jo+9AqZ1GEts7biW6qlQ0hV2Fa0SzXFKPqDKbCDy+s+GXDhiMUgbfYMKrdeaTXg9e d05KtyqejVFsG10MWTBB4+wGT3NN4jVZ9TN/5g7x8LWgseS9Kh9XInnmErjwLh7QtmeN zFhw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqdGHfDGUDwvsR1kxn6xMAeIIHSxVnksggn7b8nKqBpKtbdO6xfbujn9OT2mHc+Fenxsox X-Received: by 10.180.92.65 with SMTP id ck1mr436977wib.15.1397129995451; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 04:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ga10sm6185785wjb.23.2014.04.10.04.39.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Apr 2014 04:39:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Burakov, Anatoly" Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:39:54 +0200 Message-ID: <2817508.QMqjK3mPRB@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.12.3 (Linux/3.13.7-1-ARCH; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] IGB_UIO port unbinding X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:38:18 -0000 Hi, 2014-04-10 09:39, Burakov, Anatoly: > As you may or may not know, the CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS was deprecated > in the official Intel(r) DPDK 1.6.0 release package. However, the code > itself (e.g. in lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal_pci.c and other places) to > support that config option was not removed. My question would be, would > anyone be opposed to a patch to remove that code entirely? E.g. does anyone > use that functionality? On my side, it's OK to remove it. I think you can prepare the patch and we'll wait 1 week before applying it. If nobody complains, this feature will be definitely removed. -- Thomas