* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-02 11:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Savinay Dharmappa
@ 2020-03-02 12:51 ` David Marchand
2020-03-02 14:40 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2020-03-02 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Savinay Dharmappa
Cc: dev, Ananyev, Konstantin, Iremonger, Bernard, Akhil Goyal
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:43 PM Savinay Dharmappa
<savinay.dharmappa@intel.com> wrote:
>
> test app to measures the performance of libipsec
> api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
Missing MAINTAINERS update.
> ---
> app/test/Makefile | 2 +-
> app/test/meson.build | 2 +
> app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c | 637 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
>
> diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
> index 1f080d162..83cf4c09d 100644
> --- a/app/test/Makefile
> +++ b/app/test/Makefile
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_BPF) += test_bpf.c
>
> SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RCU) += test_rcu_qsbr.c test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
>
> -SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c
> +SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c test_ipsec_perf.c
> SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec_sad.c
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC),y)
> LDLIBS += -lrte_ipsec
> diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
> index 0a2ce710f..7a2ec1331 100644
> --- a/app/test/meson.build
> +++ b/app/test/meson.build
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
> 'test_interrupts.c',
> 'test_ipsec.c',
> 'test_ipsec_sad.c',
> + 'test_ipsec_perf.c',
> 'test_kni.c',
> 'test_kvargs.c',
> 'test_link_bonding.c',
> @@ -225,6 +226,7 @@ fast_test_names = [
> 'fbarray_autotest',
> 'hash_readwrite_func_autotest',
> 'ipsec_autotest',
> + 'ipsec_perf_autotest',
> 'kni_autotest',
> 'kvargs_autotest',
> 'member_autotest',
This test ends with a timeout in Travis.
Perf tests should be in the appropriate list.
https://travis-ci.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/292924971
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-02 11:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-03-02 12:51 ` David Marchand
@ 2020-03-02 14:40 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-03-03 15:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-05 7:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Savinay Dharmappa
3 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Medvedkin, Vladimir @ 2020-03-02 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Savinay Dharmappa, dev; +Cc: konstantin.ananyev, bernard.iremonger, akhil.goyal
Hi Savinay,
On 02/03/2020 11:43, Savinay Dharmappa wrote:
> test app to measures the performance of libipsec
> api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/Makefile | 2 +-
> app/test/meson.build | 2 +
> app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c | 637 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
>
> diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
> index 1f080d162..83cf4c09d 100644
> --- a/app/test/Makefile
> +++ b/app/test/Makefile
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_BPF) += test_bpf.c
>
> SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RCU) += test_rcu_qsbr.c test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
>
> -SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c
> +SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c test_ipsec_perf.c
> SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec_sad.c
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC),y)
> LDLIBS += -lrte_ipsec
> diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
> index 0a2ce710f..7a2ec1331 100644
> --- a/app/test/meson.build
> +++ b/app/test/meson.build
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
> 'test_interrupts.c',
> 'test_ipsec.c',
> 'test_ipsec_sad.c',
> + 'test_ipsec_perf.c',
> 'test_kni.c',
> 'test_kvargs.c',
> 'test_link_bonding.c',
> @@ -225,6 +226,7 @@ fast_test_names = [
> 'fbarray_autotest',
> 'hash_readwrite_func_autotest',
> 'ipsec_autotest',
> + 'ipsec_perf_autotest',
> 'kni_autotest',
> 'kvargs_autotest',
> 'member_autotest',
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..1fb2299dc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,637 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> +#include <rte_ether.h>
> +#include <rte_ip.h>
> +#include <rte_byteorder.h>
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> +#include <rte_ring.h>
> +#include <rte_memory.h>
> +#include <rte_common.h>
> +#include <rte_hexdump.h>
> +#include <rte_mbuf.h>
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> +#include <rte_memcpy.h>
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> +#include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
> +#include <rte_ip.h>
> +
> +#include <rte_crypto.h>
> +#include <rte_cryptodev.h>
> +#include <rte_cryptodev_pmd.h>
> +#include <rte_lcore.h>
> +#include <rte_ipsec.h>
> +#include <rte_random.h>
> +#include <rte_esp.h>
> +#include <rte_security_driver.h>
Please remove unnecessary includes
> +
> +#include "test.h"
> +#include "test_cryptodev.h"
> +
> +#define RING_SIZE 4096
> +#define BURST_SIZE 64
> +#define NUM_MBUF 4095
> +#define DEFAULT_SPI 7
> +
> +struct ipsec_test_cfg {
> + uint32_t replay_win_sz;
> + uint32_t esn;
> + uint64_t flags;
> + enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
> +};
> +
> +struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, *cop_pool;
> +
> +struct stats_counter {
> + uint64_t nb_prepare_call;
> + uint64_t nb_prepare_pkt;
> + uint64_t nb_process_call;
> + uint64_t nb_process_pkt;
> + uint64_t prepare_ticks_elapsed;
> + uint64_t process_ticks_elapsed;
> +};
> +
> +struct ipsec_sa {
> + struct rte_ipsec_session ss[2];
> + struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm sa_prm;
> + struct rte_security_ipsec_xform ipsec_xform;
> + struct rte_crypto_sym_xform cipher_xform;
> + struct rte_crypto_sym_xform auth_xform;
> + struct rte_crypto_sym_xform aead_xform;
> + struct rte_crypto_sym_xform *crypto_xforms;
> + struct rte_crypto_op *cop[BURST_SIZE];
> + enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
> + struct stats_counter cnt;
> + uint32_t replay_win_sz;
> + uint32_t sa_flags;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ipsec_test_cfg test_cfg[] = {
> + {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
> + {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
> + {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
> + {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
> +
> +};
> +
> +static struct rte_ipv4_hdr ipv4_outer = {
> + .version_ihl = IPVERSION << 4 |
> + sizeof(ipv4_outer) / RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER,
> + .time_to_live = IPDEFTTL,
> + .next_proto_id = IPPROTO_ESP,
> + .src_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 1, 100),
> + .dst_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 2, 100),
> +};
> +
> +static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_prepare;
> +static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_process;
> +static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_prepare;
> +static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_process;
> +
> +struct supported_cipher_algo {
> + const char *keyword;
> + enum rte_crypto_cipher_algorithm algo;
> + uint16_t iv_len;
> + uint16_t block_size;
> + uint16_t key_len;
> +};
> +
> +struct supported_auth_algo {
> + const char *keyword;
> + enum rte_crypto_auth_algorithm algo;
> + uint16_t digest_len;
> + uint16_t key_len;
> + uint8_t key_not_req;
> +};
> +
> +struct supported_aead_algo {
> + const char *keyword;
> + enum rte_crypto_aead_algorithm algo;
> + uint16_t iv_len;
> + uint16_t block_size;
> + uint16_t digest_len;
> + uint16_t key_len;
> + uint8_t aad_len;
> +};
> +
> +const struct supported_cipher_algo cipher_algo[] = {
> + {
> + .keyword = "aes-128-cbc",
> + .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_CBC,
> + .iv_len = 16,
> + .block_size = 16,
> + .key_len = 16
> + }
> +};
> +
> +const struct supported_auth_algo auth_algo[] = {
> + {
> + .keyword = "sha1-hmac",
> + .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SHA1_HMAC,
> + .digest_len = 12,
> + .key_len = 20
> + }
> +};
> +
> +const struct supported_aead_algo aead_algo[] = {
> + {
> + .keyword = "aes-128-gcm",
> + .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_AES_GCM,
> + .iv_len = 8,
> + .block_size = 4,
> + .key_len = 20,
> + .digest_len = 16,
> + .aad_len = 8,
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static struct rte_mbuf *generate_mbuf_data(struct rte_mempool *mpool)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mpool);
> +
> + if (mbuf) {
> + mbuf->data_len = 64;
> + mbuf->pkt_len = 64;
> + }
> +
> + return mbuf;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +fill_ipsec_param(struct ipsec_sa *sa)
> +{
> + struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm *prm = &sa->sa_prm;
> +
> + memset(prm, 0, sizeof(*prm));
> +
> + prm->flags = sa->sa_flags;
> +
> + /* setup ipsec xform */
> + prm->ipsec_xform = sa->ipsec_xform;
> + prm->ipsec_xform.salt = (uint32_t)rte_rand();
> + prm->ipsec_xform.replay_win_sz = sa->replay_win_sz;
> +
> + /* setup tunnel related fields */
> + prm->tun.hdr_len = sizeof(ipv4_outer);
> + prm->tun.next_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
> + prm->tun.hdr = &ipv4_outer;
> +
> + if (sa->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD) {
> + sa->aead_xform.type = sa->type;
> + sa->aead_xform.aead.algo = aead_algo->algo;
> + sa->aead_xform.next = NULL;
> + sa->aead_xform.aead.digest_length = aead_algo->digest_len;
> + sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
> + sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.length = 12;
> +
> + if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
> + RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
> + sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_DECRYPT;
> + } else {
> + sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_ENCRYPT;
> + }
> +
> + sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->aead_xform;
> + } else {
> + sa->cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
> + sa->cipher_xform.cipher.algo = cipher_algo->algo;
> + sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
> + sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = 12;
> + sa->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
> + sa->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
> + sa->auth_xform.auth.digest_length = auth_algo->digest_len;
> +
> +
> + if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
> + RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
> + sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
> + RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
> + sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
> + sa->cipher_xform.next = NULL;
> + sa->auth_xform.next = &sa->cipher_xform;
> + sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->auth_xform;
> + } else {
> + sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
> + RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
> + sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_GENERATE;
> + sa->auth_xform.next = NULL;
> + sa->cipher_xform.next = &sa->auth_xform;
> + sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->cipher_xform;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + prm->crypto_xform = sa->crypto_xforms;
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +create_sa(enum rte_security_session_action_type action_type,
> + struct ipsec_sa *sa)
> +{
> + static struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session dummy_ses;
> + size_t sz;
> + int rc;
> +
> + memset(&sa->ss[0], 0, sizeof(sa->ss[0]));
> +
> + rc = fill_ipsec_param(sa);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + printf("failed to fill ipsec param\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + /* create rte_ipsec_sa*/
> + sz = rte_ipsec_sa_size(&sa->sa_prm);
> + TEST_ASSERT(sz > 0, "rte_ipsec_sa_size() failed\n");
> +
> + sa->ss[0].sa = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sz, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(sa->ss[0].sa,
> + "failed to allocate memory for rte_ipsec_sa\n");
> +
> + sa->ss[0].type = action_type;
> + sa->ss[0].crypto.ses = &dummy_ses;
> +
> + rc = rte_ipsec_sa_init(sa->ss[0].sa, &sa->sa_prm, sz);
> + rc = (rc > 0 && (uint32_t)rc <= sz) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (rc == 0)
> + rc = rte_ipsec_session_prepare(&sa->ss[0]);
> + else
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +packet_prepare(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> + uint16_t num_pkts)
> +{
> + uint64_t time_stamp;
> + uint16_t k = 0;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++) {
> +
> + sa->cop[i] = rte_crypto_op_alloc(cop_pool,
> + RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC);
> +
> + if (sa->cop[i] == NULL) {
> +
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> + "Failed to allocate symmetric crypto op\n");
> +
> + return k;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* call crypto prepare */
> + time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
> +
> + k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&sa->ss[0], buf,
> + sa->cop, num_pkts);
> +
> + time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
> +
> + if (k != num_pkts) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare fail\n");
> + return k;
> + }
> +
> + sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
> + sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call++;
> + sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt += k;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++)
> + rte_crypto_op_free(sa->cop[i]);
> +
> + return k;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +packet_process(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
> + uint16_t num_pkts)
> +{
> + uint64_t time_stamp;
> + uint16_t k = 0;
> +
> + time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
> +
> + /* call crypto prepare */
> + k = rte_ipsec_pkt_process(&sa->ss[0], buf, num_pkts);
> +
> + time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
> +
> + if (k != num_pkts) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_process fail\n");
> + return k;
> + }
> +
> + sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
> + sa->cnt.nb_process_call++;
> + sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt += k;
> +
> + return k;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +create_traffic(struct ipsec_sa *sa, struct rte_ring *deq_ring,
> + struct rte_ring *enq_ring, struct rte_ring *ring)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[BURST_SIZE];
> + uint16_t num_pkts, n;
> +
> + while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
> +
> + num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
> + RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
> +
> + if (num_pkts == 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + n = packet_prepare(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
> + if (n != num_pkts)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
> + num_pkts, NULL);
> + if (num_pkts == 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + deq_ring = enq_ring;
> + enq_ring = ring;
> +
> + while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
> +
> + num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
> + RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
> + if (num_pkts == 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + n = packet_process(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
> + if (n != num_pkts)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
> + num_pkts, NULL);
> + if (num_pkts == 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +fill_ipsec_sa_out(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
> + struct ipsec_sa *sa)
> +{
> + sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
> + sa->type = test_cfg->type;
> + sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
> + sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
> + sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
> + sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
> + sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
> + sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
> + sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
> + sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +fill_ipsec_sa_in(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
> + struct ipsec_sa *sa)
> +{
> + sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
> + sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
> + sa->type = test_cfg->type;
> + sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
> + sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
> + sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
> + sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
> + sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
> + sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
> + sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
> + sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +init_sa_session(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
> + struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
> +{
> +
> + int rc;
> +
> + fill_ipsec_sa_in(test_cfg, sa_in);
> + fill_ipsec_sa_out(test_cfg, sa_out);
> +
> + /* create rte_ipsec_sa*/
> + rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_out);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_in);
> + if (rc != 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +testsuite_setup(void)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[NUM_MBUF];
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("IPSEC_PERF_MBUFPOOL",
> + NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0, MBUF_SIZE,
> + rte_socket_id());
> + if (mbuf_pool == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create MBUFPOOL\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + cop_pool = rte_crypto_op_pool_create(
> + "MBUF_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_POOL",
> + RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
> + NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE,
> + DEFAULT_NUM_XFORMS *
> + sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) +
> + MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH,
> + rte_socket_id());
> + if (cop_pool == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create CRYPTO_OP_POOL\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + ring_inb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring0", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_inb_prepare == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + ring_inb_process = rte_ring_create("ring1", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_inb_process == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + ring_outb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring2", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_outb_prepare == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + ring_outb_process = rte_ring_create("ring3", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_outb_process == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_MBUF; i++)
> + mbuf[i] = generate_mbuf_data(mbuf_pool);
> +
> + ret = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_bulk(ring_inb_prepare, (void **)mbuf,
> + NUM_MBUF, NULL);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +measure_performance(struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
> +{
> + uint64_t time_diff = 0;
> + uint64_t begin = 0;
> + uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
> +
> + begin = rte_get_timer_cycles();
> +
> + do {
> + if (create_traffic(sa_out, ring_inb_prepare, ring_inb_process,
> + ring_outb_prepare) < 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + if (create_traffic(sa_in, ring_outb_prepare, ring_outb_process,
> + ring_inb_prepare) < 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin;
> +
> + } while (time_diff < (hz * 10));
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +print_metrics(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
> + struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
> +{
> + printf("\nMetrics of libipsec prepare/process api:\n");
> +
> + printf("replay window size = %u\n", test_cfg->replay_win_sz);
> + if (test_cfg->esn)
> + printf("replay esn is enabled\n");
> + else
> + printf("replay esn is disabled\n");
> + if (test_cfg->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD)
> + printf("AEAD algo is AES_GCM\n");
> + else
> + printf("CIPHER/AUTH algo is AES_CBC/SHA1\n");
> +
> +
> + printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
> + (long double)sa_out->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
> + / sa_out->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
> + printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
> + (long double)sa_out->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
> + / sa_out->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
> + printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
> + (long double)sa_in->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
> + / sa_in->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
> + printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
> + (long double)sa_in->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
> + / sa_in->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +testsuite_teardown(void)
> +{
> + if (mbuf_pool != NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "MBUFPOOL count %u\n",
> + rte_mempool_avail_count(mbuf_pool));
> + rte_mempool_free(mbuf_pool);
> + mbuf_pool = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (cop_pool != NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "CRYPTO_OP_POOL count %u\n",
> + rte_mempool_avail_count(cop_pool));
> + rte_mempool_free(cop_pool);
> + cop_pool = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + rte_ring_free(ring_inb_prepare);
> + rte_ring_free(ring_inb_process);
> + rte_ring_free(ring_outb_prepare);
> + rte_ring_free(ring_outb_process);
> +
> + ring_inb_prepare = NULL;
> + ring_inb_process = NULL;
> + ring_outb_prepare = NULL;
> + ring_outb_process = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +test_libipsec_perf(void)
> +{
> + struct ipsec_sa sa_out;
> + struct ipsec_sa sa_in;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (testsuite_setup() < 0) {
> + testsuite_teardown();
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + for (uint32_t i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(test_cfg) ; i++) {
> +
> + ret = init_sa_session(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + testsuite_teardown();
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + if (measure_performance(&sa_out, &sa_in) < 0) {
> + testsuite_teardown();
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + print_metrics(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
> + }
> +
> + testsuite_teardown();
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(ipsec_perf_autotest, test_libipsec_perf);
--
Regards,
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-02 11:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-03-02 12:51 ` David Marchand
2020-03-02 14:40 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
@ 2020-03-03 15:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-05 7:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Savinay Dharmappa
3 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-03-03 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev; +Cc: Iremonger, Bernard, akhil.goyal
Hi Savinay,
> +static int
> +testsuite_setup(void)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[NUM_MBUF];
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("IPSEC_PERF_MBUFPOOL",
> + NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0, MBUF_SIZE,
> + rte_socket_id());
> + if (mbuf_pool == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create MBUFPOOL\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + cop_pool = rte_crypto_op_pool_create(
> + "MBUF_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_POOL",
> + RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
> + NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE,
> + DEFAULT_NUM_XFORMS *
> + sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) +
> + MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH,
> + rte_socket_id());
> + if (cop_pool == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create CRYPTO_OP_POOL\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> +
> + ring_inb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring0", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_inb_prepare == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + ring_inb_process = rte_ring_create("ring1", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_inb_process == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + ring_outb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring2", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_outb_prepare == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + ring_outb_process = rte_ring_create("ring3", RING_SIZE,
> + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> + if (ring_outb_process == NULL)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_MBUF; i++)
> + mbuf[i] = generate_mbuf_data(mbuf_pool);
> +
I think enqueue below could be moved to the loop above,
so don't need to allocate mbuf[NUM_MBUF] at stack.
struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
...
for (i = 0; i < NUM_MBUF; i++) {
mbuf = generate_mbuf_data(mbuf_pool);
if (mbuf == NULL && rte_ring_sp_enqueue_bulk(ring_inb_prepare,
(void **)mbuf, 1) == 0)
break;
}
If (i != NUM_BUF)
return TEST_FAILED;
> + ret = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_bulk(ring_inb_prepare, (void **)mbuf,
> + NUM_MBUF, NULL);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> +
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-02 11:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Savinay Dharmappa
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-03 15:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-03-05 7:15 ` Savinay Dharmappa
2020-03-05 11:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-06 7:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: " Savinay Dharmappa
3 siblings, 2 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Savinay Dharmappa @ 2020-03-05 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: akhil.goyal, konstantin.ananyev
test app to measures the performance of libipsec
api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
app/test/Makefile | 2 +-
app/test/meson.build | 2 +
app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c | 618 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 623 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index c3785554f..6448fcb56 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
+M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
+F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
F: app/test-sad/
diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
index 1f080d162..83cf4c09d 100644
--- a/app/test/Makefile
+++ b/app/test/Makefile
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_BPF) += test_bpf.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RCU) += test_rcu_qsbr.c test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
-SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c
+SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c test_ipsec_perf.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec_sad.c
ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC),y)
LDLIBS += -lrte_ipsec
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index 0a2ce710f..618742026 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
'test_interrupts.c',
'test_ipsec.c',
'test_ipsec_sad.c',
+ 'test_ipsec_perf.c',
'test_kni.c',
'test_kvargs.c',
'test_link_bonding.c',
@@ -270,6 +271,7 @@ perf_test_names = [
'rand_perf_autotest',
'hash_readwrite_perf_autotest',
'hash_readwrite_lf_perf_autotest',
+ 'ipsec_perf_autotest',
]
driver_test_names = [
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..308d43d7c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,618 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <rte_ip.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
+#include <rte_ring.h>
+#include <rte_mbuf.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
+#include <rte_ipsec.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+#include "test_cryptodev.h"
+
+#define RING_SIZE 4096
+#define BURST_SIZE 64
+#define NUM_MBUF 4095
+#define DEFAULT_SPI 7
+
+struct ipsec_test_cfg {
+ uint32_t replay_win_sz;
+ uint32_t esn;
+ uint64_t flags;
+ enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
+};
+
+struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, *cop_pool;
+
+struct stats_counter {
+ uint64_t nb_prepare_call;
+ uint64_t nb_prepare_pkt;
+ uint64_t nb_process_call;
+ uint64_t nb_process_pkt;
+ uint64_t prepare_ticks_elapsed;
+ uint64_t process_ticks_elapsed;
+};
+
+struct ipsec_sa {
+ struct rte_ipsec_session ss[2];
+ struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm sa_prm;
+ struct rte_security_ipsec_xform ipsec_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform cipher_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform auth_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform aead_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform *crypto_xforms;
+ struct rte_crypto_op *cop[BURST_SIZE];
+ enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
+ struct stats_counter cnt;
+ uint32_t replay_win_sz;
+ uint32_t sa_flags;
+};
+
+static const struct ipsec_test_cfg test_cfg[] = {
+ {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
+ {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
+ {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
+ {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
+
+};
+
+static struct rte_ipv4_hdr ipv4_outer = {
+ .version_ihl = IPVERSION << 4 |
+ sizeof(ipv4_outer) / RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER,
+ .time_to_live = IPDEFTTL,
+ .next_proto_id = IPPROTO_ESP,
+ .src_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 1, 100),
+ .dst_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 2, 100),
+};
+
+static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_prepare;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_process;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_prepare;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_process;
+
+struct supported_cipher_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_cipher_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t iv_len;
+ uint16_t block_size;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+};
+
+struct supported_auth_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_auth_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t digest_len;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+ uint8_t key_not_req;
+};
+
+struct supported_aead_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_aead_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t iv_len;
+ uint16_t block_size;
+ uint16_t digest_len;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+ uint8_t aad_len;
+};
+
+const struct supported_cipher_algo cipher_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "aes-128-cbc",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_CBC,
+ .iv_len = 16,
+ .block_size = 16,
+ .key_len = 16
+ }
+};
+
+const struct supported_auth_algo auth_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "sha1-hmac",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SHA1_HMAC,
+ .digest_len = 12,
+ .key_len = 20
+ }
+};
+
+const struct supported_aead_algo aead_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "aes-128-gcm",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_AES_GCM,
+ .iv_len = 8,
+ .block_size = 4,
+ .key_len = 20,
+ .digest_len = 16,
+ .aad_len = 8,
+ }
+};
+
+static struct rte_mbuf *generate_mbuf_data(struct rte_mempool *mpool)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mpool);
+
+ if (mbuf) {
+ mbuf->data_len = 64;
+ mbuf->pkt_len = 64;
+ }
+
+ return mbuf;
+}
+
+static int
+fill_ipsec_param(struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm *prm = &sa->sa_prm;
+
+ memset(prm, 0, sizeof(*prm));
+
+ prm->flags = sa->sa_flags;
+
+ /* setup ipsec xform */
+ prm->ipsec_xform = sa->ipsec_xform;
+ prm->ipsec_xform.salt = (uint32_t)rte_rand();
+ prm->ipsec_xform.replay_win_sz = sa->replay_win_sz;
+
+ /* setup tunnel related fields */
+ prm->tun.hdr_len = sizeof(ipv4_outer);
+ prm->tun.next_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
+ prm->tun.hdr = &ipv4_outer;
+
+ if (sa->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD) {
+ sa->aead_xform.type = sa->type;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.algo = aead_algo->algo;
+ sa->aead_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.digest_length = aead_algo->digest_len;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.length = 12;
+
+ if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
+ RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_DECRYPT;
+ } else {
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_ENCRYPT;
+ }
+
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->aead_xform;
+ } else {
+ sa->cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.algo = cipher_algo->algo;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = 12;
+ sa->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.digest_length = auth_algo->digest_len;
+
+
+ if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
+ RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
+ sa->cipher_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->auth_xform.next = &sa->cipher_xform;
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->auth_xform;
+ } else {
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_GENERATE;
+ sa->auth_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->cipher_xform.next = &sa->auth_xform;
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->cipher_xform;
+ }
+ }
+
+ prm->crypto_xform = sa->crypto_xforms;
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+create_sa(enum rte_security_session_action_type action_type,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ static struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session dummy_ses;
+ size_t sz;
+ int rc;
+
+ memset(&sa->ss[0], 0, sizeof(sa->ss[0]));
+
+ rc = fill_ipsec_param(sa);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ printf("failed to fill ipsec param\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ /* create rte_ipsec_sa*/
+ sz = rte_ipsec_sa_size(&sa->sa_prm);
+ TEST_ASSERT(sz > 0, "rte_ipsec_sa_size() failed\n");
+
+ sa->ss[0].sa = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sz, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
+ TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(sa->ss[0].sa,
+ "failed to allocate memory for rte_ipsec_sa\n");
+
+ sa->ss[0].type = action_type;
+ sa->ss[0].crypto.ses = &dummy_ses;
+
+ rc = rte_ipsec_sa_init(sa->ss[0].sa, &sa->sa_prm, sz);
+ rc = (rc > 0 && (uint32_t)rc <= sz) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = rte_ipsec_session_prepare(&sa->ss[0]);
+ else
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+packet_prepare(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
+ uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ uint64_t time_stamp;
+ uint16_t k = 0;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++) {
+
+ sa->cop[i] = rte_crypto_op_alloc(cop_pool,
+ RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC);
+
+ if (sa->cop[i] == NULL) {
+
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
+ "Failed to allocate symmetric crypto op\n");
+
+ return k;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* call crypto prepare */
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+
+ k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&sa->ss[0], buf,
+ sa->cop, num_pkts);
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
+
+ if (k != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare fail\n");
+ return k;
+ }
+
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call++;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt += k;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++)
+ rte_crypto_op_free(sa->cop[i]);
+
+ return k;
+}
+
+static int
+packet_process(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
+ uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ uint64_t time_stamp;
+ uint16_t k = 0;
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+
+ /* call crypto prepare */
+ k = rte_ipsec_pkt_process(&sa->ss[0], buf, num_pkts);
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
+
+ if (k != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_process fail\n");
+ return k;
+ }
+
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call++;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt += k;
+
+ return k;
+}
+
+static int
+create_traffic(struct ipsec_sa *sa, struct rte_ring *deq_ring,
+ struct rte_ring *enq_ring, struct rte_ring *ring)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[BURST_SIZE];
+ uint16_t num_pkts, n;
+
+ while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
+
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ n = packet_prepare(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
+ if (n != num_pkts)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ num_pkts, NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ deq_ring = enq_ring;
+ enq_ring = ring;
+
+ while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ n = packet_process(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
+ if (n != num_pkts)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ num_pkts, NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static void
+fill_ipsec_sa_out(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
+ sa->type = test_cfg->type;
+ sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
+ sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+
+}
+
+static void
+fill_ipsec_sa_in(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
+ sa->type = test_cfg->type;
+ sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
+ sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+}
+
+static int
+init_sa_session(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+
+ int rc;
+
+ fill_ipsec_sa_in(test_cfg, sa_in);
+ fill_ipsec_sa_out(test_cfg, sa_out);
+
+ /* create rte_ipsec_sa*/
+ rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_out);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_in);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+testsuite_setup(void)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
+ int i;
+
+ mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("IPSEC_PERF_MBUFPOOL",
+ NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0, MBUF_SIZE,
+ rte_socket_id());
+ if (mbuf_pool == NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create MBUFPOOL\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ cop_pool = rte_crypto_op_pool_create(
+ "MBUF_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_POOL",
+ RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
+ NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE,
+ DEFAULT_NUM_XFORMS *
+ sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) +
+ MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH,
+ rte_socket_id());
+ if (cop_pool == NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create CRYPTO_OP_POOL\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ ring_inb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring0", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_inb_prepare == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_inb_process = rte_ring_create("ring1", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_inb_process == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_outb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring2", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_outb_prepare == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_outb_process = rte_ring_create("ring3", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_outb_process == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_MBUF; i++) {
+ mbuf = generate_mbuf_data(mbuf_pool);
+
+ if (mbuf && rte_ring_sp_enqueue_bulk(ring_inb_prepare,
+ (void **)&mbuf, 1, NULL))
+ continue;
+ else
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+measure_performance(struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+ uint64_t time_diff = 0;
+ uint64_t begin = 0;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
+
+ begin = rte_get_timer_cycles();
+
+ do {
+ if (create_traffic(sa_out, ring_inb_prepare, ring_inb_process,
+ ring_outb_prepare) < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ if (create_traffic(sa_in, ring_outb_prepare, ring_outb_process,
+ ring_inb_prepare) < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin;
+
+ } while (time_diff < (hz * 10));
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static void
+print_metrics(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+ printf("\nMetrics of libipsec prepare/process api:\n");
+
+ printf("replay window size = %u\n", test_cfg->replay_win_sz);
+ if (test_cfg->esn)
+ printf("replay esn is enabled\n");
+ else
+ printf("replay esn is disabled\n");
+ if (test_cfg->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD)
+ printf("AEAD algo is AES_GCM\n");
+ else
+ printf("CIPHER/AUTH algo is AES_CBC/SHA1\n");
+
+
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_out->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_out->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_out->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_out->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_in->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_in->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_in->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_in->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
+
+}
+
+static void
+testsuite_teardown(void)
+{
+ if (mbuf_pool != NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "MBUFPOOL count %u\n",
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(mbuf_pool));
+ rte_mempool_free(mbuf_pool);
+ mbuf_pool = NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (cop_pool != NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "CRYPTO_OP_POOL count %u\n",
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(cop_pool));
+ rte_mempool_free(cop_pool);
+ cop_pool = NULL;
+ }
+
+ rte_ring_free(ring_inb_prepare);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_inb_process);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_outb_prepare);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_outb_process);
+
+ ring_inb_prepare = NULL;
+ ring_inb_process = NULL;
+ ring_outb_prepare = NULL;
+ ring_outb_process = NULL;
+}
+
+static int
+test_libipsec_perf(void)
+{
+ struct ipsec_sa sa_out;
+ struct ipsec_sa sa_in;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (testsuite_setup() < 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (uint32_t i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(test_cfg) ; i++) {
+
+ ret = init_sa_session(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ if (measure_performance(&sa_out, &sa_in) < 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ print_metrics(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
+ }
+
+ testsuite_teardown();
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(ipsec_perf_autotest, test_libipsec_perf);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-05 7:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Savinay Dharmappa
@ 2020-03-05 11:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-05 17:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-06 7:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: " Savinay Dharmappa
1 sibling, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-03-05 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev; +Cc: akhil.goyal
>
> test app to measures the performance of libipsec
> api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> ---
I think the header need to be "app/test", or "test/ipsec".
Apart from that:
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> 2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-05 11:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-03-05 17:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-05 22:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-03-05 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin
Cc: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, akhil.goyal, bernard.iremonger,
vladimir.medvedkin
05/03/2020 12:45, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> I think the header need to be "app/test", or "test/ipsec".
It should be "test/ipsec" as it is an IPsec test command
in the test application.
> Apart from that:
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
I wonder why we have a different maintainer for each IPsec test.
It looks a bit confusing.
IPsec - EXPERIMENTAL
M: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
F: lib/librte_ipsec/
M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
F: app/test-sad/
In general, only one person takes the responsibility to be
the main contact of any related question in the area.
So the file pattern could be:
F: app/test/test_ipsec*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-05 17:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-03-05 22:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-06 8:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-03-05 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, akhil.goyal, Iremonger, Bernard,
Medvedkin, Vladimir
>
> 05/03/2020 12:45, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > I think the header need to be "app/test", or "test/ipsec".
>
> It should be "test/ipsec" as it is an IPsec test command
> in the test application.
>
> > Apart from that:
> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>
> I wonder why we have a different maintainer for each IPsec test.
> It looks a bit confusing.
>
> IPsec - EXPERIMENTAL
> M: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
> F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> F: app/test-sad/
I suppose mainly by historical reasons -
each of these tests have different authors.
Obviously each author claimed maintanership of his own code.
Do you consider that as a problem?
>
> In general, only one person takes the responsibility to be
> the main contact of any related question in the area.
>
> So the file pattern could be:
> F: app/test/test_ipsec*
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-05 22:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-03-06 8:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-10 13:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-03-06 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin
Cc: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, akhil.goyal, Iremonger, Bernard,
Medvedkin, Vladimir
05/03/2020 23:51, Ananyev, Konstantin:
>
> > 05/03/2020 12:45, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > I think the header need to be "app/test", or "test/ipsec".
> >
> > It should be "test/ipsec" as it is an IPsec test command
> > in the test application.
> >
> > > Apart from that:
> > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> >
> > I wonder why we have a different maintainer for each IPsec test.
> > It looks a bit confusing.
> >
> > IPsec - EXPERIMENTAL
> > M: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
> > F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > F: app/test-sad/
>
> I suppose mainly by historical reasons -
> each of these tests have different authors.
> Obviously each author claimed maintanership of his own code.
> Do you consider that as a problem?
Yes I consider a maintainer should know a whole area
and be the point of contact for this area.
For instance, when there is a bug with a test,
we don't know whether the problem is in the test or in the library.
Note that the original author can be found with the git history.
> > In general, only one person takes the responsibility to be
> > the main contact of any related question in the area.
> >
> > So the file pattern could be:
> > F: app/test/test_ipsec*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-06 8:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-03-10 13:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-03-10 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-03-10 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, akhil.goyal, Iremonger, Bernard,
Medvedkin, Vladimir
> 05/03/2020 23:51, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> >
> > > 05/03/2020 12:45, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > I think the header need to be "app/test", or "test/ipsec".
> > >
> > > It should be "test/ipsec" as it is an IPsec test command
> > > in the test application.
> > >
> > > > Apart from that:
> > > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > >
> > > I wonder why we have a different maintainer for each IPsec test.
> > > It looks a bit confusing.
> > >
> > > IPsec - EXPERIMENTAL
> > > M: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > > T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
> > > F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > F: app/test-sad/
> >
> > I suppose mainly by historical reasons -
> > each of these tests have different authors.
> > Obviously each author claimed maintanership of his own code.
> > Do you consider that as a problem?
>
> Yes I consider a maintainer should know a whole area
> and be the point of contact for this area.
> For instance, when there is a bug with a test,
> we don't know whether the problem is in the test or in the library.
But same problem could appear with any test/sample app.
Let say you have a problem with testpmd.
Is that testpmd itself, rte_ethdev or particular PMD?
Obviously some preliminary investigation is needed before finger pointing.
I don't see why having multiple persons as maintainers for the same area
is a problem. In fact, it probably gives more chances for faster turnover
(as long as they do their maintainer job properly).
>
> Note that the original author can be found with the git history.
>
> > > In general, only one person takes the responsibility to be
> > > the main contact of any related question in the area.
> > >
> > > So the file pattern could be:
> > > F: app/test/test_ipsec*
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-10 13:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-03-10 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-03-10 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin
Cc: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, akhil.goyal, Iremonger, Bernard,
Medvedkin, Vladimir
10/03/2020 14:24, Ananyev, Konstantin:
>
> > 05/03/2020 23:51, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > >
> > > > 05/03/2020 12:45, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > > I think the header need to be "app/test", or "test/ipsec".
> > > >
> > > > It should be "test/ipsec" as it is an IPsec test command
> > > > in the test application.
> > > >
> > > > > Apart from that:
> > > > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > I wonder why we have a different maintainer for each IPsec test.
> > > > It looks a bit confusing.
> > > >
> > > > IPsec - EXPERIMENTAL
> > > > M: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > > > T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
> > > > F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > > M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > > F: app/test-sad/
> > >
> > > I suppose mainly by historical reasons -
> > > each of these tests have different authors.
> > > Obviously each author claimed maintanership of his own code.
> > > Do you consider that as a problem?
> >
> > Yes I consider a maintainer should know a whole area
> > and be the point of contact for this area.
> > For instance, when there is a bug with a test,
> > we don't know whether the problem is in the test or in the library.
>
> But same problem could appear with any test/sample app.
> Let say you have a problem with testpmd.
> Is that testpmd itself, rte_ethdev or particular PMD?
> Obviously some preliminary investigation is needed before finger pointing.
> I don't see why having multiple persons as maintainers for the same area
> is a problem. In fact, it probably gives more chances for faster turnover
> (as long as they do their maintainer job properly).
Yes, having several maintainers is good.
But having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
In general the maintainers of a lib are also maintaining the related app files.
> > Note that the original author can be found with the git history.
> >
> > > > In general, only one person takes the responsibility to be
> > > > the main contact of any related question in the area.
> > > >
> > > > So the file pattern could be:
> > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec*
> >
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-05 7:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-03-05 11:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-03-06 7:08 ` Savinay Dharmappa
2020-04-19 21:43 ` Akhil Goyal
` (2 more replies)
1 sibling, 3 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Savinay Dharmappa @ 2020-03-06 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: akhil.goyal, konstantin.ananyev
test app to measures the performance of libipsec
api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
app/test/Makefile | 2 +-
app/test/meson.build | 2 +
app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c | 619 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 624 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index c3785554f..6448fcb56 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
+M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
+F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
F: app/test-sad/
diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
index 1f080d162..83cf4c09d 100644
--- a/app/test/Makefile
+++ b/app/test/Makefile
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_BPF) += test_bpf.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RCU) += test_rcu_qsbr.c test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
-SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c
+SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c test_ipsec_perf.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec_sad.c
ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC),y)
LDLIBS += -lrte_ipsec
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index 0a2ce710f..618742026 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
'test_interrupts.c',
'test_ipsec.c',
'test_ipsec_sad.c',
+ 'test_ipsec_perf.c',
'test_kni.c',
'test_kvargs.c',
'test_link_bonding.c',
@@ -270,6 +271,7 @@ perf_test_names = [
'rand_perf_autotest',
'hash_readwrite_perf_autotest',
'hash_readwrite_lf_perf_autotest',
+ 'ipsec_perf_autotest',
]
driver_test_names = [
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d4541afe6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,619 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <rte_ip.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
+#include <rte_ring.h>
+#include <rte_mbuf.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
+#include <rte_ipsec.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+#include "test_cryptodev.h"
+
+#define RING_SIZE 4096
+#define BURST_SIZE 64
+#define NUM_MBUF 4095
+#define DEFAULT_SPI 7
+
+struct ipsec_test_cfg {
+ uint32_t replay_win_sz;
+ uint32_t esn;
+ uint64_t flags;
+ enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
+};
+
+struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, *cop_pool;
+
+struct stats_counter {
+ uint64_t nb_prepare_call;
+ uint64_t nb_prepare_pkt;
+ uint64_t nb_process_call;
+ uint64_t nb_process_pkt;
+ uint64_t prepare_ticks_elapsed;
+ uint64_t process_ticks_elapsed;
+};
+
+struct ipsec_sa {
+ struct rte_ipsec_session ss[2];
+ struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm sa_prm;
+ struct rte_security_ipsec_xform ipsec_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform cipher_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform auth_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform aead_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform *crypto_xforms;
+ struct rte_crypto_op *cop[BURST_SIZE];
+ enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
+ struct stats_counter cnt;
+ uint32_t replay_win_sz;
+ uint32_t sa_flags;
+};
+
+static const struct ipsec_test_cfg test_cfg[] = {
+ {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
+ {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
+ {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
+ {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
+
+};
+
+static struct rte_ipv4_hdr ipv4_outer = {
+ .version_ihl = IPVERSION << 4 |
+ sizeof(ipv4_outer) / RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER,
+ .time_to_live = IPDEFTTL,
+ .next_proto_id = IPPROTO_ESP,
+ .src_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 1, 100),
+ .dst_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 2, 100),
+};
+
+static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_prepare;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_process;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_prepare;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_process;
+
+struct supported_cipher_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_cipher_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t iv_len;
+ uint16_t block_size;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+};
+
+struct supported_auth_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_auth_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t digest_len;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+ uint8_t key_not_req;
+};
+
+struct supported_aead_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_aead_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t iv_len;
+ uint16_t block_size;
+ uint16_t digest_len;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+ uint8_t aad_len;
+};
+
+const struct supported_cipher_algo cipher_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "aes-128-cbc",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_CBC,
+ .iv_len = 16,
+ .block_size = 16,
+ .key_len = 16
+ }
+};
+
+const struct supported_auth_algo auth_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "sha1-hmac",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SHA1_HMAC,
+ .digest_len = 12,
+ .key_len = 20
+ }
+};
+
+const struct supported_aead_algo aead_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "aes-128-gcm",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_AES_GCM,
+ .iv_len = 8,
+ .block_size = 4,
+ .key_len = 20,
+ .digest_len = 16,
+ .aad_len = 8,
+ }
+};
+
+static struct rte_mbuf *generate_mbuf_data(struct rte_mempool *mpool)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mpool);
+
+ if (mbuf) {
+ mbuf->data_len = 64;
+ mbuf->pkt_len = 64;
+ }
+
+ return mbuf;
+}
+
+static int
+fill_ipsec_param(struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm *prm = &sa->sa_prm;
+
+ memset(prm, 0, sizeof(*prm));
+
+ prm->flags = sa->sa_flags;
+
+ /* setup ipsec xform */
+ prm->ipsec_xform = sa->ipsec_xform;
+ prm->ipsec_xform.salt = (uint32_t)rte_rand();
+ prm->ipsec_xform.replay_win_sz = sa->replay_win_sz;
+
+ /* setup tunnel related fields */
+ prm->tun.hdr_len = sizeof(ipv4_outer);
+ prm->tun.next_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
+ prm->tun.hdr = &ipv4_outer;
+
+ if (sa->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD) {
+ sa->aead_xform.type = sa->type;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.algo = aead_algo->algo;
+ sa->aead_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.digest_length = aead_algo->digest_len;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.length = 12;
+
+ if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
+ RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_DECRYPT;
+ } else {
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_ENCRYPT;
+ }
+
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->aead_xform;
+ } else {
+ sa->cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.algo = cipher_algo->algo;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = 12;
+ sa->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.digest_length = auth_algo->digest_len;
+
+
+ if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
+ RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
+ sa->cipher_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->auth_xform.next = &sa->cipher_xform;
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->auth_xform;
+ } else {
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_GENERATE;
+ sa->auth_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->cipher_xform.next = &sa->auth_xform;
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->cipher_xform;
+ }
+ }
+
+ prm->crypto_xform = sa->crypto_xforms;
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+create_sa(enum rte_security_session_action_type action_type,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ static struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session dummy_ses;
+ size_t sz;
+ int rc;
+
+ memset(&sa->ss[0], 0, sizeof(sa->ss[0]));
+
+ rc = fill_ipsec_param(sa);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ printf("failed to fill ipsec param\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ /* create rte_ipsec_sa*/
+ sz = rte_ipsec_sa_size(&sa->sa_prm);
+ TEST_ASSERT(sz > 0, "rte_ipsec_sa_size() failed\n");
+
+ sa->ss[0].sa = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sz, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
+ TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(sa->ss[0].sa,
+ "failed to allocate memory for rte_ipsec_sa\n");
+
+ sa->ss[0].type = action_type;
+ sa->ss[0].crypto.ses = &dummy_ses;
+
+ rc = rte_ipsec_sa_init(sa->ss[0].sa, &sa->sa_prm, sz);
+ rc = (rc > 0 && (uint32_t)rc <= sz) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = rte_ipsec_session_prepare(&sa->ss[0]);
+ else
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+packet_prepare(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
+ uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ uint64_t time_stamp;
+ uint16_t k = 0, i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++) {
+
+ sa->cop[i] = rte_crypto_op_alloc(cop_pool,
+ RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC);
+
+ if (sa->cop[i] == NULL) {
+
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
+ "Failed to allocate symmetric crypto op\n");
+
+ return k;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* call crypto prepare */
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+
+ k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&sa->ss[0], buf,
+ sa->cop, num_pkts);
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
+
+ if (k != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare fail\n");
+ return k;
+ }
+
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call++;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt += k;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++)
+ rte_crypto_op_free(sa->cop[i]);
+
+ return k;
+}
+
+static int
+packet_process(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
+ uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ uint64_t time_stamp;
+ uint16_t k = 0;
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+
+ /* call crypto prepare */
+ k = rte_ipsec_pkt_process(&sa->ss[0], buf, num_pkts);
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
+
+ if (k != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_process fail\n");
+ return k;
+ }
+
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call++;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt += k;
+
+ return k;
+}
+
+static int
+create_traffic(struct ipsec_sa *sa, struct rte_ring *deq_ring,
+ struct rte_ring *enq_ring, struct rte_ring *ring)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[BURST_SIZE];
+ uint16_t num_pkts, n;
+
+ while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
+
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ n = packet_prepare(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
+ if (n != num_pkts)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ num_pkts, NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ deq_ring = enq_ring;
+ enq_ring = ring;
+
+ while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ n = packet_process(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
+ if (n != num_pkts)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ num_pkts, NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static void
+fill_ipsec_sa_out(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
+ sa->type = test_cfg->type;
+ sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
+ sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+
+}
+
+static void
+fill_ipsec_sa_in(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
+ sa->type = test_cfg->type;
+ sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
+ sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+}
+
+static int
+init_sa_session(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+
+ int rc;
+
+ fill_ipsec_sa_in(test_cfg, sa_in);
+ fill_ipsec_sa_out(test_cfg, sa_out);
+
+ /* create rte_ipsec_sa*/
+ rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_out);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_in);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+testsuite_setup(void)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
+ int i;
+
+ mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("IPSEC_PERF_MBUFPOOL",
+ NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0, MBUF_SIZE,
+ rte_socket_id());
+ if (mbuf_pool == NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create MBUFPOOL\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ cop_pool = rte_crypto_op_pool_create(
+ "MBUF_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_POOL",
+ RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
+ NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE,
+ DEFAULT_NUM_XFORMS *
+ sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) +
+ MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH,
+ rte_socket_id());
+ if (cop_pool == NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create CRYPTO_OP_POOL\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ ring_inb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring0", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_inb_prepare == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_inb_process = rte_ring_create("ring1", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_inb_process == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_outb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ring2", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_outb_prepare == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_outb_process = rte_ring_create("ring3", RING_SIZE,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_outb_process == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_MBUF; i++) {
+ mbuf = generate_mbuf_data(mbuf_pool);
+
+ if (mbuf && rte_ring_sp_enqueue_bulk(ring_inb_prepare,
+ (void **)&mbuf, 1, NULL))
+ continue;
+ else
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+measure_performance(struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+ uint64_t time_diff = 0;
+ uint64_t begin = 0;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
+
+ begin = rte_get_timer_cycles();
+
+ do {
+ if (create_traffic(sa_out, ring_inb_prepare, ring_inb_process,
+ ring_outb_prepare) < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ if (create_traffic(sa_in, ring_outb_prepare, ring_outb_process,
+ ring_inb_prepare) < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin;
+
+ } while (time_diff < (hz * 10));
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static void
+print_metrics(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+ printf("\nMetrics of libipsec prepare/process api:\n");
+
+ printf("replay window size = %u\n", test_cfg->replay_win_sz);
+ if (test_cfg->esn)
+ printf("replay esn is enabled\n");
+ else
+ printf("replay esn is disabled\n");
+ if (test_cfg->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD)
+ printf("AEAD algo is AES_GCM\n");
+ else
+ printf("CIPHER/AUTH algo is AES_CBC/SHA1\n");
+
+
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_out->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_out->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_out->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_out->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_in->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_in->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_in->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_in->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
+
+}
+
+static void
+testsuite_teardown(void)
+{
+ if (mbuf_pool != NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "MBUFPOOL count %u\n",
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(mbuf_pool));
+ rte_mempool_free(mbuf_pool);
+ mbuf_pool = NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (cop_pool != NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "CRYPTO_OP_POOL count %u\n",
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(cop_pool));
+ rte_mempool_free(cop_pool);
+ cop_pool = NULL;
+ }
+
+ rte_ring_free(ring_inb_prepare);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_inb_process);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_outb_prepare);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_outb_process);
+
+ ring_inb_prepare = NULL;
+ ring_inb_process = NULL;
+ ring_outb_prepare = NULL;
+ ring_outb_process = NULL;
+}
+
+static int
+test_libipsec_perf(void)
+{
+ struct ipsec_sa sa_out;
+ struct ipsec_sa sa_in;
+ uint32_t i;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (testsuite_setup() < 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(test_cfg) ; i++) {
+
+ ret = init_sa_session(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ if (measure_performance(&sa_out, &sa_in) < 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ print_metrics(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
+ }
+
+ testsuite_teardown();
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(ipsec_perf_autotest, test_libipsec_perf);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-06 7:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: " Savinay Dharmappa
@ 2020-04-19 21:43 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-21 2:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-23 15:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Savinay Dharmappa
2 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2020-04-19 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Savinay Dharmappa, dev; +Cc: konstantin.ananyev
> test app to measures the performance of libipsec
> api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> ---
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-06 7:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-04-19 21:43 ` Akhil Goyal
@ 2020-04-21 2:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 2:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-23 15:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Savinay Dharmappa
2 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-04-21 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akhil.goyal, konstantin.ananyev, Savinay Dharmappa; +Cc: dev, david.marchand
06/03/2020 08:08, Savinay Dharmappa:
> test app to measures the performance of libipsec
> api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
Please make sentences in commit logs.
> Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> ---
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> F: app/test-sad/
Repeating what I said on v3:
Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-21 2:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-04-21 2:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 10:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-04-21 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akhil.goyal, konstantin.ananyev, Savinay Dharmappa; +Cc: dev, david.marchand
21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> 06/03/2020 08:08, Savinay Dharmappa:
> > test app to measures the performance of libipsec
> > api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
>
> Please make sentences in commit logs.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > ---
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > F: app/test-sad/
>
> Repeating what I said on v3:
> Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
In addition, reading the first lines of the file, I see two mistakes:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,619 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
The Copyright year should be 2020 I guess.
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <rte_ip.h>
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> +#include <rte_ring.h>
> +#include <rte_mbuf.h>
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
rte_malloc.h is already included 3 lines above.
I have a bad feeling about this patch,
I think it should be dropped from 20.05-rc1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-21 2:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-04-21 10:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-21 10:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-04-21 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon, akhil.goyal, Dharmappa, Savinay; +Cc: dev, david.marchand
>
> 21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 06/03/2020 08:08, Savinay Dharmappa:
> > > test app to measures the performance of libipsec
> > > api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process.
> >
> > Please make sentences in commit logs.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > F: app/test-sad/
> >
> > Repeating what I said on v3:
> > Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> > The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
>
>
> In addition, reading the first lines of the file, I see two mistakes:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,619 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > + * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
>
> The Copyright year should be 2020 I guess.
>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <stdio.h>
> > +#include <rte_ip.h>
> > +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> > +#include <rte_ring.h>
> > +#include <rte_mbuf.h>
> > +#include <rte_malloc.h>
>
> rte_malloc.h is already included 3 lines above.
>
>
> I have a bad feeling about this patch,
> I think it should be dropped from 20.05-rc1.
If you feel patch is not good enough - sure feel free to drop it,
we'll try to fix the issues and resubmit it for rc2.
About having separate MAINTAINER for the test -
honestly I don't understand why it is a problem for you.
Obviously we would like to spread the load - what's wrong with it?
Konstantin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-21 10:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-04-21 10:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 11:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-04-21 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin; +Cc: akhil.goyal, Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, david.marchand
21/04/2020 12:21, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > 21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > > F: app/test-sad/
> > >
> > > Repeating what I said on v3:
> > > Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> > > The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
[...]
> About having separate MAINTAINER for the test -
> honestly I don't understand why it is a problem for you.
> Obviously we would like to spread the load - what's wrong with it?
This is a problem of ownership.
Maintaining a library means you take care of every aspect, including tests.
That's why I would like to see you as a global maintainer of IPsec.
It doesn't prevent you to delegate workload, of course.
But at the end it is more convenient to know there is a limited number
of persons responsible for the global quality of a component,
a person which is accountable and answering questions on the topic,
no matter which exact file we are talking about.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-21 10:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-04-21 11:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-21 11:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-04-21 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: akhil.goyal, Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, david.marchand, Iremonger, Bernard
>
> 21/04/2020 12:21, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > 21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > > > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > > > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > > > F: app/test-sad/
> > > >
> > > > Repeating what I said on v3:
> > > > Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> > > > The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
> [...]
> > About having separate MAINTAINER for the test -
> > honestly I don't understand why it is a problem for you.
> > Obviously we would like to spread the load - what's wrong with it?
>
> This is a problem of ownership.
> Maintaining a library means you take care of every aspect, including tests.
> That's why I would like to see you as a global maintainer of IPsec.
>
> It doesn't prevent you to delegate workload, of course.
> But at the end it is more convenient to know there is a limited number
> of persons responsible for the global quality of a component,
> a person which is accountable and answering questions on the topic,
> no matter which exact file we are talking about.
Just talked with Bernard, he kindly agreed to be a maintainer for all ipsec UT:
app/test/test_ipsec*
Hope that will fulfil your concern?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-21 11:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-04-21 11:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-21 12:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-04-21 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin
Cc: akhil.goyal, Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, david.marchand, Iremonger, Bernard
21/04/2020 13:07, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > 21/04/2020 12:21, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > 21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > > > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > > > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > > > > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > > > > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > > > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > > > > F: app/test-sad/
> > > > >
> > > > > Repeating what I said on v3:
> > > > > Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> > > > > The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
> > [...]
> > > About having separate MAINTAINER for the test -
> > > honestly I don't understand why it is a problem for you.
> > > Obviously we would like to spread the load - what's wrong with it?
> >
> > This is a problem of ownership.
> > Maintaining a library means you take care of every aspect, including tests.
> > That's why I would like to see you as a global maintainer of IPsec.
> >
> > It doesn't prevent you to delegate workload, of course.
> > But at the end it is more convenient to know there is a limited number
> > of persons responsible for the global quality of a component,
> > a person which is accountable and answering questions on the topic,
> > no matter which exact file we are talking about.
>
> Just talked with Bernard, he kindly agreed to be a maintainer for all ipsec UT:
> app/test/test_ipsec*
> Hope that will fulfil your concern?
My concern was to have the library maintainer maintaining also the related tests.
I don't understand why you don't want to take this responsibility,
but I cannot force you.
Having only one maintainer for IPsec tests is better than the current situation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-21 11:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-04-21 12:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-21 12:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-04-21 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: akhil.goyal, Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, david.marchand, Iremonger, Bernard
> 21/04/2020 13:07, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > 21/04/2020 12:21, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > > 21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > > > > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > > > > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > > > > > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > > > > > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > > > > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > > > > > F: app/test-sad/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Repeating what I said on v3:
> > > > > > Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> > > > > > The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
> > > [...]
> > > > About having separate MAINTAINER for the test -
> > > > honestly I don't understand why it is a problem for you.
> > > > Obviously we would like to spread the load - what's wrong with it?
> > >
> > > This is a problem of ownership.
> > > Maintaining a library means you take care of every aspect, including tests.
> > > That's why I would like to see you as a global maintainer of IPsec.
> > >
> > > It doesn't prevent you to delegate workload, of course.
> > > But at the end it is more convenient to know there is a limited number
> > > of persons responsible for the global quality of a component,
> > > a person which is accountable and answering questions on the topic,
> > > no matter which exact file we are talking about.
> >
> > Just talked with Bernard, he kindly agreed to be a maintainer for all ipsec UT:
> > app/test/test_ipsec*
> > Hope that will fulfil your concern?
>
> My concern was to have the library maintainer maintaining also the related tests.
> I don't understand why you don't want to take this responsibility,
> but I cannot force you.
> Having only one maintainer for IPsec tests is better than the current situation.
Ok, are you going to drop v4, so we can submit v5 with the fixes?
Or should we submit a patch with fixes on top of v4?
Konstantin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-21 12:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-04-21 12:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-04-21 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin
Cc: akhil.goyal, Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, david.marchand, Iremonger, Bernard
21/04/2020 14:04, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > 21/04/2020 13:07, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > 21/04/2020 12:21, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > > > 21/04/2020 04:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > > > > > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> > > > > > > > M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > > > > > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> > > > > > > > +M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> > > > > > > > M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > > > > > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> > > > > > > > F: app/test-sad/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Repeating what I said on v3:
> > > > > > > Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous.
> > > > > > > The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.
> > > > [...]
> > > > > About having separate MAINTAINER for the test -
> > > > > honestly I don't understand why it is a problem for you.
> > > > > Obviously we would like to spread the load - what's wrong with it?
> > > >
> > > > This is a problem of ownership.
> > > > Maintaining a library means you take care of every aspect, including tests.
> > > > That's why I would like to see you as a global maintainer of IPsec.
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't prevent you to delegate workload, of course.
> > > > But at the end it is more convenient to know there is a limited number
> > > > of persons responsible for the global quality of a component,
> > > > a person which is accountable and answering questions on the topic,
> > > > no matter which exact file we are talking about.
> > >
> > > Just talked with Bernard, he kindly agreed to be a maintainer for all ipsec UT:
> > > app/test/test_ipsec*
> > > Hope that will fulfil your concern?
> >
> > My concern was to have the library maintainer maintaining also the related tests.
> > I don't understand why you don't want to take this responsibility,
> > but I cannot force you.
> > Having only one maintainer for IPsec tests is better than the current situation.
>
> Ok, are you going to drop v4, so we can submit v5 with the fixes?
> Or should we submit a patch with fixes on top of v4?
v4 is dropped, you can send a v5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-03-06 7:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: " Savinay Dharmappa
2020-04-19 21:43 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-21 2:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2020-04-23 15:25 ` Savinay Dharmappa
2020-04-24 10:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Savinay Dharmappa @ 2020-04-23 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, konstantin.ananyev, akhil.goyal
Add new test-case to measure performance of
ipsec data-path functions.
Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
app/test/Makefile | 2 +-
app/test/meson.build | 2 +
app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c | 614 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 618 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e18b2dba7..8fd029572 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ M: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
F: lib/librte_ipsec/
M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
-F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
+F: app/test/test_ipsec*
F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile
index 4582eca6c..54c72c8a9 100644
--- a/app/test/Makefile
+++ b/app/test/Makefile
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RCU) += test_rcu_qsbr.c test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY) += test_security.c
-SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c
+SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c test_ipsec_perf.c
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec_sad.c
ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC),y)
LDLIBS += -lrte_ipsec
diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index a9a8eabcd..2055c6ea0 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c',
'test_interrupts.c',
'test_ipsec.c',
'test_ipsec_sad.c',
+ 'test_ipsec_perf.c',
'test_kni.c',
'test_kvargs.c',
'test_link_bonding.c',
@@ -285,6 +286,7 @@ perf_test_names = [
'hash_readwrite_perf_autotest',
'hash_readwrite_lf_perf_autotest',
'trace_perf_autotest',
+ 'ipsec_perf_autotest',
]
driver_test_names = [
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..92106bf37
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,614 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2020 Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <rte_ip.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
+#include <rte_ring.h>
+#include <rte_mbuf.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
+#include <rte_ipsec.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+#include "test_cryptodev.h"
+
+#define RING_SIZE 4096
+#define BURST_SIZE 64
+#define NUM_MBUF 4095
+#define DEFAULT_SPI 7
+
+struct ipsec_test_cfg {
+ uint32_t replay_win_sz;
+ uint32_t esn;
+ uint64_t flags;
+ enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
+};
+
+struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool, *cop_pool;
+
+struct stats_counter {
+ uint64_t nb_prepare_call;
+ uint64_t nb_prepare_pkt;
+ uint64_t nb_process_call;
+ uint64_t nb_process_pkt;
+ uint64_t prepare_ticks_elapsed;
+ uint64_t process_ticks_elapsed;
+};
+
+struct ipsec_sa {
+ struct rte_ipsec_session ss[2];
+ struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm sa_prm;
+ struct rte_security_ipsec_xform ipsec_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform cipher_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform auth_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform aead_xform;
+ struct rte_crypto_sym_xform *crypto_xforms;
+ struct rte_crypto_op *cop[BURST_SIZE];
+ enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type type;
+ struct stats_counter cnt;
+ uint32_t replay_win_sz;
+ uint32_t sa_flags;
+};
+
+static const struct ipsec_test_cfg test_cfg[] = {
+ {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
+ {0, 0, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
+ {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD},
+ {128, 1, 0, RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER},
+
+};
+
+static struct rte_ipv4_hdr ipv4_outer = {
+ .version_ihl = IPVERSION << 4 |
+ sizeof(ipv4_outer) / RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER,
+ .time_to_live = IPDEFTTL,
+ .next_proto_id = IPPROTO_ESP,
+ .src_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 1, 100),
+ .dst_addr = RTE_IPV4(192, 168, 2, 100),
+};
+
+static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_prepare;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_inb_process;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_prepare;
+static struct rte_ring *ring_outb_process;
+
+struct supported_cipher_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_cipher_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t iv_len;
+ uint16_t block_size;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+};
+
+struct supported_auth_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_auth_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t digest_len;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+ uint8_t key_not_req;
+};
+
+struct supported_aead_algo {
+ const char *keyword;
+ enum rte_crypto_aead_algorithm algo;
+ uint16_t iv_len;
+ uint16_t block_size;
+ uint16_t digest_len;
+ uint16_t key_len;
+ uint8_t aad_len;
+};
+
+const struct supported_cipher_algo cipher_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "aes-128-cbc",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_CBC,
+ .iv_len = 16,
+ .block_size = 16,
+ .key_len = 16
+ }
+};
+
+const struct supported_auth_algo auth_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "sha1-hmac",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SHA1_HMAC,
+ .digest_len = 12,
+ .key_len = 20
+ }
+};
+
+const struct supported_aead_algo aead_algo[] = {
+ {
+ .keyword = "aes-128-gcm",
+ .algo = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_AES_GCM,
+ .iv_len = 8,
+ .block_size = 4,
+ .key_len = 20,
+ .digest_len = 16,
+ .aad_len = 8,
+ }
+};
+
+static struct rte_mbuf *generate_mbuf_data(struct rte_mempool *mpool)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mpool);
+
+ if (mbuf) {
+ mbuf->data_len = 64;
+ mbuf->pkt_len = 64;
+ }
+
+ return mbuf;
+}
+
+static int
+fill_ipsec_param(struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ struct rte_ipsec_sa_prm *prm = &sa->sa_prm;
+
+ memset(prm, 0, sizeof(*prm));
+
+ prm->flags = sa->sa_flags;
+
+ /* setup ipsec xform */
+ prm->ipsec_xform = sa->ipsec_xform;
+ prm->ipsec_xform.salt = (uint32_t)rte_rand();
+ prm->ipsec_xform.replay_win_sz = sa->replay_win_sz;
+
+ /* setup tunnel related fields */
+ prm->tun.hdr_len = sizeof(ipv4_outer);
+ prm->tun.next_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
+ prm->tun.hdr = &ipv4_outer;
+
+ if (sa->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD) {
+ sa->aead_xform.type = sa->type;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.algo = aead_algo->algo;
+ sa->aead_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.digest_length = aead_algo->digest_len;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.iv.length = 12;
+
+ if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
+ RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_DECRYPT;
+ } else {
+ sa->aead_xform.aead.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AEAD_OP_ENCRYPT;
+ }
+
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->aead_xform;
+ } else {
+ sa->cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.algo = cipher_algo->algo;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = 12;
+ sa->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.digest_length = auth_algo->digest_len;
+
+
+ if (sa->ipsec_xform.direction ==
+ RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
+ sa->cipher_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->auth_xform.next = &sa->cipher_xform;
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->auth_xform;
+ } else {
+ sa->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+ RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
+ sa->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_GENERATE;
+ sa->auth_xform.next = NULL;
+ sa->cipher_xform.next = &sa->auth_xform;
+ sa->crypto_xforms = &sa->cipher_xform;
+ }
+ }
+
+ prm->crypto_xform = sa->crypto_xforms;
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+create_sa(enum rte_security_session_action_type action_type,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ static struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session dummy_ses;
+ size_t sz;
+ int rc;
+
+ memset(&sa->ss[0], 0, sizeof(sa->ss[0]));
+
+ rc = fill_ipsec_param(sa);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ printf("failed to fill ipsec param\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ sz = rte_ipsec_sa_size(&sa->sa_prm);
+ TEST_ASSERT(sz > 0, "rte_ipsec_sa_size() failed\n");
+
+ sa->ss[0].sa = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sz, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
+ TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(sa->ss[0].sa,
+ "failed to allocate memory for rte_ipsec_sa\n");
+
+ sa->ss[0].type = action_type;
+ sa->ss[0].crypto.ses = &dummy_ses;
+
+ rc = rte_ipsec_sa_init(sa->ss[0].sa, &sa->sa_prm, sz);
+ rc = (rc > 0 && (uint32_t)rc <= sz) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = rte_ipsec_session_prepare(&sa->ss[0]);
+ else
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+packet_prepare(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
+ uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ uint64_t time_stamp;
+ uint16_t k = 0, i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++) {
+
+ sa->cop[i] = rte_crypto_op_alloc(cop_pool,
+ RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC);
+
+ if (sa->cop[i] == NULL) {
+
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
+ "Failed to allocate symmetric crypto op\n");
+
+ return k;
+ }
+ }
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+
+ k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&sa->ss[0], buf,
+ sa->cop, num_pkts);
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
+
+ if (k != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare fail\n");
+ return k;
+ }
+
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call++;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt += k;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_pkts; i++)
+ rte_crypto_op_free(sa->cop[i]);
+
+ return k;
+}
+
+static int
+packet_process(struct rte_mbuf **buf, struct ipsec_sa *sa,
+ uint16_t num_pkts)
+{
+ uint64_t time_stamp;
+ uint16_t k = 0;
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+
+ k = rte_ipsec_pkt_process(&sa->ss[0], buf, num_pkts);
+
+ time_stamp = rte_rdtsc_precise() - time_stamp;
+
+ if (k != num_pkts) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_ipsec_pkt_process fail\n");
+ return k;
+ }
+
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed += time_stamp;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call++;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt += k;
+
+ return k;
+}
+
+static int
+create_traffic(struct ipsec_sa *sa, struct rte_ring *deq_ring,
+ struct rte_ring *enq_ring, struct rte_ring *ring)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf[BURST_SIZE];
+ uint16_t num_pkts, n;
+
+ while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
+
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ n = packet_prepare(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
+ if (n != num_pkts)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ num_pkts, NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ deq_ring = enq_ring;
+ enq_ring = ring;
+
+ while (rte_ring_empty(deq_ring) == 0) {
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sc_dequeue_burst(deq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ RTE_DIM(mbuf), NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ n = packet_process(mbuf, sa, num_pkts);
+ if (n != num_pkts)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ num_pkts = rte_ring_sp_enqueue_burst(enq_ring, (void **)mbuf,
+ num_pkts, NULL);
+ if (num_pkts == 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static void
+fill_ipsec_sa_out(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_EGRESS;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
+ sa->type = test_cfg->type;
+ sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
+ sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+
+}
+
+static void
+fill_ipsec_sa_in(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa)
+{
+ sa->ipsec_xform.spi = DEFAULT_SPI;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.direction = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.proto = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_PROTO_ESP;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.mode = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_MODE_TUNNEL;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.tunnel.type = RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_TUNNEL_IPV4;
+ sa->ipsec_xform.options.esn = test_cfg->esn;
+ sa->type = test_cfg->type;
+ sa->replay_win_sz = test_cfg->replay_win_sz;
+ sa->sa_flags = test_cfg->flags;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_call = 0;
+ sa->cnt.nb_process_pkt = 0;
+ sa->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+ sa->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed = 0;
+}
+
+static int
+init_sa_session(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+
+ int rc;
+
+ fill_ipsec_sa_in(test_cfg, sa_in);
+ fill_ipsec_sa_out(test_cfg, sa_out);
+
+ rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_out);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ rc = create_sa(RTE_SECURITY_ACTION_TYPE_NONE, sa_in);
+ if (rc != 0) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "out bound create_sa failed, cfg\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+testsuite_setup(void)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
+ int i;
+
+ mbuf_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("IPSEC_PERF_MBUFPOOL",
+ NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE, 0, MBUF_SIZE,
+ rte_socket_id());
+ if (mbuf_pool == NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create MBUFPOOL\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ cop_pool = rte_crypto_op_pool_create(
+ "MBUF_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_POOL",
+ RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC,
+ NUM_MBUFS, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE,
+ DEFAULT_NUM_XFORMS *
+ sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) +
+ MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH,
+ rte_socket_id());
+ if (cop_pool == NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Can't create CRYPTO_OP_POOL\n");
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ ring_inb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ipsec_test_ring_inb_prepare",
+ RING_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_inb_prepare == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_inb_process = rte_ring_create("ipsec_test_ring_inb_process",
+ RING_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_inb_process == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_outb_prepare = rte_ring_create("ipsec_test_ring_outb_prepare",
+ RING_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_outb_prepare == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ ring_outb_process = rte_ring_create("ipsec_test_ring_outb_process",
+ RING_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+ if (ring_outb_process == NULL)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_MBUF; i++) {
+ mbuf = generate_mbuf_data(mbuf_pool);
+
+ if (mbuf && rte_ring_sp_enqueue_bulk(ring_inb_prepare,
+ (void **)&mbuf, 1, NULL))
+ continue;
+ else
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int
+measure_performance(struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+ uint64_t time_diff = 0;
+ uint64_t begin = 0;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
+
+ begin = rte_get_timer_cycles();
+
+ do {
+ if (create_traffic(sa_out, ring_inb_prepare, ring_inb_process,
+ ring_outb_prepare) < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ if (create_traffic(sa_in, ring_outb_prepare, ring_outb_process,
+ ring_inb_prepare) < 0)
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+
+ time_diff = rte_get_timer_cycles() - begin;
+
+ } while (time_diff < (hz * 10));
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static void
+print_metrics(const struct ipsec_test_cfg *test_cfg,
+ struct ipsec_sa *sa_out, struct ipsec_sa *sa_in)
+{
+ printf("\nMetrics of libipsec prepare/process api:\n");
+
+ printf("replay window size = %u\n", test_cfg->replay_win_sz);
+ if (test_cfg->esn)
+ printf("replay esn is enabled\n");
+ else
+ printf("replay esn is disabled\n");
+ if (test_cfg->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AEAD)
+ printf("AEAD algo is AES_GCM\n");
+ else
+ printf("CIPHER/AUTH algo is AES_CBC/SHA1\n");
+
+
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_out->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_out->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in outbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_out->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_out->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt prepare in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_in->cnt.prepare_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_in->cnt.nb_prepare_pkt);
+ printf("avg cycles for a pkt process in inbound is = %.2Lf\n",
+ (long double)sa_in->cnt.process_ticks_elapsed
+ / sa_in->cnt.nb_process_pkt);
+
+}
+
+static void
+testsuite_teardown(void)
+{
+ if (mbuf_pool != NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "MBUFPOOL count %u\n",
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(mbuf_pool));
+ rte_mempool_free(mbuf_pool);
+ mbuf_pool = NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (cop_pool != NULL) {
+ RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "CRYPTO_OP_POOL count %u\n",
+ rte_mempool_avail_count(cop_pool));
+ rte_mempool_free(cop_pool);
+ cop_pool = NULL;
+ }
+
+ rte_ring_free(ring_inb_prepare);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_inb_process);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_outb_prepare);
+ rte_ring_free(ring_outb_process);
+
+ ring_inb_prepare = NULL;
+ ring_inb_process = NULL;
+ ring_outb_prepare = NULL;
+ ring_outb_process = NULL;
+}
+
+static int
+test_libipsec_perf(void)
+{
+ struct ipsec_sa sa_out;
+ struct ipsec_sa sa_in;
+ uint32_t i;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (testsuite_setup() < 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(test_cfg) ; i++) {
+
+ ret = init_sa_session(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ if (measure_performance(&sa_out, &sa_in) < 0) {
+ testsuite_teardown();
+ return TEST_FAILED;
+ }
+
+ print_metrics(&test_cfg[i], &sa_out, &sa_in);
+ }
+
+ testsuite_teardown();
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(ipsec_perf_autotest, test_libipsec_perf);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-23 15:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Savinay Dharmappa
@ 2020-04-24 10:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-09 21:46 ` Akhil Goyal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2020-04-24 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dharmappa, Savinay, dev, akhil.goyal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dharmappa, Savinay <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 4:25 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Subject: [PATCH v5] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
>
> Add new test-case to measure performance of
> ipsec data-path functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> ---
Tested-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> --
> 2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance
2020-04-24 10:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2020-05-09 21:46 ` Akhil Goyal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2020-05-09 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ananyev, Konstantin, Dharmappa, Savinay, dev
> >
> > Add new test-case to measure performance of
> > ipsec data-path functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> > ---
>
> Tested-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread