From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386F95A53 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:42:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id k204so17772313wmk.0 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 06:42:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nZyx64pqMSf90+n/o9/Xe9Z2E5jhFwNrDr0UrLDQHQk=; b=UEy2OKqxmKtpXRMHnunme/3xb6usK/f20kk/YKWq8B+VlgTSrGcmuDJc8RrP/GLrkD 7upztiQa4AWUj4zqdodL7IH6/L0ovrCQ3zM3nT0u6MiH88BJu8y5vL/Kf4CyIbDwhXn9 SiX6WWCmb2Thm3Flc2//3+AB5FbTbHVGzhsAXYeRVThzmEyDkZtA8/peTuOjIUkX2+Qj UXJELBvbweiIy7dbzU9zXE77SA9TVUFLz/j/9J8te/PxR6NANoEHKDnhVHD6L3o7uZQw D3W6+EEo0GAKR5baNE1LwcrRl9p0TM1SblSjL/SoJe/SU3+a2XJPdQWd2hGmbCOlXsk9 zJwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nZyx64pqMSf90+n/o9/Xe9Z2E5jhFwNrDr0UrLDQHQk=; b=AQwwxwvvYPCyJ3Bv4+hGFQIn1Oewei79HV61SBSba/G6ki1eQ9X3nBKFyYs+NLK5oG igIOi4vD4jCbLcAqLxeDB9h6ycYNQUgYhHcmV9qsy5zJfkEY9kp8AifJ+WHzzDmLw1F5 z79F1KepQpBe6/At8FkT4rWDUPyTrLrAg6va6ShjlLxDm7HJgEgi1RMTPeMq5LUoVbFp 6GfvP4odPNG+RRQQZsGNehA4HhoCMKR+Boa/Wm8Yg3BOqp6NAnknQooL/gu231hmPhkc DpVpX4+a8N5IBCJFU7N2jtGX3MDTNhDDLZCN2Q1xGEGv5VtTMYKGk7/Lnqm5Um7M+F8f ssyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKPgdvurS81jxlQCAf6uuHoW3WvRyrvEz2QZUQ5w1Y5UcP3XMoBhIg7fCLN5PY6PiyL X-Received: by 10.28.44.70 with SMTP id s67mr8541892wms.14.1465393336037; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 06:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dd7sm1600288wjb.22.2016.06.08.06.42.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Jun 2016 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:42:14 +0200 Message-ID: <28207692.5xZGMHagFl@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160608124319.GA4449@localhost.localdomain> References: <1464540424-12631-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <57580FE4.3060808@intel.com> <20160608124319.GA4449@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/20] DPDK PMD for ThunderX NIC device X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 13:42:16 -0000 2016-06-08 18:13, Jerin Jacob: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > Hi Jerin, > > > > In patch subject, as tag, other drivers are using only driver name, and > > Intel drivers also has "driver/base", since base code has some special > > case. For thunderx, what do you think about keeping subject as: > > "thunderx: ...." > > > > Hi Ferruh, > > We may add crypto or other builtin ThunderX HW accelerated block drivers > in future to DPDK. > So that is the reason why I thought of keeping the subject as thunderx/nicvf. > If you don't have any objection then I would like to keep it as > thunderx/nicvf or just nicvf. I don't like the name nicvf but I guess that's the official name? Thus I agree the title should be thunderx/nicvf or thunderx_nicvf.