From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754E1A00C2; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:18:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997C51C23D; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:18:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.229]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130571C23C for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667AF580505; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:18:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:18:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= HUFSg1L+ooDk2oBDCjCkSEACZotA8J1CNgwLNrtQibQ=; b=hvwYpxX8mo8ktnJw JhhhOadyI7LYj8RF9Sv/HQZSF63mL9G6Ky3q+B5j0WGXsa1l68mYu0AV/LcsAsY1 VF1h8XfOfwdvwaGMoAQBJiPJYoLnVAQzv3gButNxh+zhbcyWlYAGmKlm5ma4fU4w zYmsjaKd2i1sItbQk9HbkLKmLNSVjFhQLQq+Pqgz6kg01tDLbEvQ9QQA0Ja8Tiky D//JaAY2dW0VhxzFvUsU3yKWYUFHkCSEB+m4TacfLoL4fI5btLXlDBdSUIeJI6vK hOcUc06PyyFi2OgCVEUlcU+F51DxgMm2P8uZNAtdAqG3mansX0YpWGK9gmW4gLgK o+oyPQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=HUFSg1L+ooDk2oBDCjCkSEACZotA8J1CNgwLNrtQi bQ=; b=d4LkKgdMLKQan2Z7FJKQvY72ZEOMd7LQikiauFFhKP5b7PQNkOsaGdmhn SKqWOjiT8AZf5o6fpYiAPVVhl7vA86U5P6EnGDBmH/Lvvuwlrs6gYJMDV5EoYtKt gmNnUoptGD3Jk0f3+kZ6YzMKZiAqUGSb98/gTk1KBdXPedW7TcSJFz5oCMw61Vlg T/39fdb8bQ0zGDF87q0AHFTsrngLIMAo4gMqwKoiBlU0CUD7kn1NWnbns3UAJP3e zEpz3m2SfsFOHZ2hTwGwc0nVPrlM+grE2iwv7sZ1ud2ZlhpEBIIgEmBufMVwlzhG ouujCPWvYOhmxcIGwXyCJJuyozZnQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrh hofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghi lhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurh ephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofho nhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehtrhgrvhhishdqtghirdgtohhmpddtvddrihhtnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddt fedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC67E3065C9D; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:18:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand , Ray Kinsella Cc: dev , "Wang, Haiyue" , Matan Azrad , Anoob Joseph , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Mahipal Challa , Eelco Chaudron , Cristian Dumitrescu , Jingjing Wu , Wenzhuo Lu , Shahaf Shuler , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Nithin Dabilpuram , Alfredo Cardigliano , Neil Horman Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:18:04 +0200 Message-ID: <2825922.687JKscXgg@thomas> In-Reply-To: <9fdccceb-d667-0418-ddda-1584c76991cf@ashroe.eu> References: <20200420093421.68984-1-mdr@ashroe.eu> <9fdccceb-d667-0418-ddda-1584c76991cf@ashroe.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] abi: change references to abi 20.0.1 to abi v21 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/04/2020 10:07, Ray Kinsella: > On 20/04/2020 13:20, David Marchand wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:57 PM Ray Kinsella wrote: > >> > >> Travis ABI check warnings, can be safely ignored in this case, I think. > >> > >> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds/161009923 > > > > How about comparing to 19.11 ABI then? > > > Concluded on separate thread it is best to leave this as v20.02. It means the ABI tool will be reporting a failure? The tool needs to reliably report zero false positive. How can we mitigate this issue?