From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC69D1B138 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:44:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Oct 2018 02:44:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,338,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="89095945" Received: from dwdohert-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.24.253]) ([10.252.24.253]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2018 02:44:46 -0700 To: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org Cc: gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, ophirmu@mellanox.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com References: <20180907230958.21402-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20180928164039.2380-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20180928164039.2380-4-thomas@monjalon.net> From: "Doherty, Declan" Message-ID: <283f0f5d-7ca1-6e8e-cccb-f922e175157a@intel.com> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:44:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180928164039.2380-4-thomas@monjalon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] eal: allow probing a device again X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 09:44:49 -0000 On 28/09/2018 5:40 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > In the devargs syntax for device representors, it is possible to add > several devices at once: -w dbdf,representor=[0-3] > It will become a more frequent case when introducing wildcards > and ranges in the new devargs syntax. > > If a devargs string is provided for probing, and updated with a bigger > range for a new probing, then we do not want it to fail because > part of this range was already probed previously. > There can be new ports to create from an existing rte_device. > > That's why the checks for an already probed device > are moved as PMD responsibility. > Only the PMD knows the ports attached to one rte_device. > > In the case of vdev, a global check is kept in insert_vdev(), > assuming that a vdev will always have only one port. > In the case of NXP buses, the probing is done only once (no hotplug), > though a check is added at bus level for consistency. > > As another consequence of being able to probe in several steps, > the field rte_device.devargs must not be considered as a full > representation of the rte_device, but only the latest probing args. > Anyway, the field rte_device.devargs is used only for probing. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- ... > Hey Thomas, did you consider of adding a driver flags to the rte_driver structure which has a driver re-probe flag. If this flag is disabled by default, current drivers could be left unmodified and any new driver which want to support re-probing enable this flag and then support the functionality in there probe function. Then we could check this flag in the bus driver on making a call on whether to re-probe. Declan