* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbevf: fix incorrect RX function selection
@ 2015-06-12 15:18 Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-06-12 15:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy @ 2015-06-12 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
The logic to select ixgbe VF RX function is different than PF side.
There are a few issues with its current state:
- it does not allow to select ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec among other options.
- it can cause memory corruption for scatter mode as it does not allocate
enough entries in sw_ring.
- when checksum is enabled, incorrect vector RX function is selected.
To solve above issues, change the VF RX function selection logic to
mimic PF side.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 9 +++++++++
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 11 ++---------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
index 0d9f9b2..c1a70a1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
@@ -2947,6 +2947,8 @@ static int
ixgbevf_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
{
struct rte_eth_conf* conf = &dev->data->dev_conf;
+ struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter =
+ (struct ixgbe_adapter *)dev->data->dev_private;
PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Configured Virtual Function port id: %d",
dev->data->port_id);
@@ -2967,6 +2969,13 @@ ixgbevf_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
}
#endif
+ /*
+ * Initialize to TRUE. If any of Rx queues doesn't meet the bulk
+ * allocation or vector Rx preconditions we will reset it.
+ */
+ adapter->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed = true;
+ adapter->rx_vec_allowed = true;
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
index 4f9ab22..7cc26ef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
@@ -4549,7 +4549,6 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
(uint16_t)dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len);
/* Setup RX queues */
- dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts;
for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
@@ -4615,14 +4614,6 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
if (!dev->data->scattered_rx)
PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "forcing scatter mode");
dev->data->scattered_rx = 1;
-#ifdef RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR
- if (rte_is_power_of_2(rxq->nb_rx_desc))
- dev->rx_pkt_burst =
- ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts_vec;
- else
-#endif
- dev->rx_pkt_burst =
- ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc;
}
}
@@ -4640,6 +4631,8 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
IXGBE_PSRTYPE_RQPL_SHIFT;
IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFPSRTYPE, psrtype);
+ ixgbe_set_rx_function(dev);
+
return 0;
}
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbevf: fix incorrect RX function selection
2015-06-12 15:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbevf: fix incorrect RX function selection Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
@ 2015-06-12 15:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-06-22 10:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2015-06-12 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, dev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 4:18 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbevf: fix incorrect RX function selection
>
> The logic to select ixgbe VF RX function is different than PF side.
>
> There are a few issues with its current state:
> - it does not allow to select ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec among other options.
> - it can cause memory corruption for scatter mode as it does not allocate
> enough entries in sw_ring.
> - when checksum is enabled, incorrect vector RX function is selected.
>
> To solve above issues, change the VF RX function selection logic to
> mimic PF side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 11 ++---------
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index 0d9f9b2..c1a70a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -2947,6 +2947,8 @@ static int
> ixgbevf_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
> struct rte_eth_conf* conf = &dev->data->dev_conf;
> + struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter =
> + (struct ixgbe_adapter *)dev->data->dev_private;
>
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Configured Virtual Function port id: %d",
> dev->data->port_id);
> @@ -2967,6 +2969,13 @@ ixgbevf_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> }
> #endif
>
> + /*
> + * Initialize to TRUE. If any of Rx queues doesn't meet the bulk
> + * allocation or vector Rx preconditions we will reset it.
> + */
> + adapter->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed = true;
> + adapter->rx_vec_allowed = true;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index 4f9ab22..7cc26ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -4549,7 +4549,6 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> (uint16_t)dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len);
>
> /* Setup RX queues */
> - dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts;
> for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
>
> @@ -4615,14 +4614,6 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> if (!dev->data->scattered_rx)
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "forcing scatter mode");
> dev->data->scattered_rx = 1;
> -#ifdef RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR
> - if (rte_is_power_of_2(rxq->nb_rx_desc))
> - dev->rx_pkt_burst =
> - ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts_vec;
> - else
> -#endif
> - dev->rx_pkt_burst =
> - ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_single_alloc;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -4640,6 +4631,8 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> IXGBE_PSRTYPE_RQPL_SHIFT;
> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFPSRTYPE, psrtype);
>
> + ixgbe_set_rx_function(dev);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> --
> 1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbevf: fix incorrect RX function selection
2015-06-12 15:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
@ 2015-06-22 10:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-06-22 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio; +Cc: dev
> > The logic to select ixgbe VF RX function is different than PF side.
> >
> > There are a few issues with its current state:
> > - it does not allow to select ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec among other options.
> > - it can cause memory corruption for scatter mode as it does not allocate
> > enough entries in sw_ring.
> > - when checksum is enabled, incorrect vector RX function is selected.
> >
> > To solve above issues, change the VF RX function selection logic to
> > mimic PF side.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Applied, thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-22 10:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-12 15:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbevf: fix incorrect RX function selection Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-06-12 15:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-06-22 10:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).