From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF18A053D; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:57:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B051C029; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:57:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6B337B4; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:57:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC995C00F5; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:57:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Aug 2020 10:57:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= ypQZ8hm2hKA29K8DLuR8Pgc3Plrx0rq3ZUjCK4mCV1I=; b=OaM3W7qniuz2Puk+ GN2W838KEqdEGWEcb3KnGPgbIn+vCEDKWkq/C/J5K4WeawPX2580l8g67wzEGjnw w1shBS7wMn5y2zYlE+eBkD43t2HzUf1KXj+6ukYFOGC62aGmZpuOduGotBjh4uPP Zqv/ltop3KbzZ5fZurcOL4Mf+aZzEGtgmL8ekGJG6TSi5slFnKUvswJxcHAmLSvn mQzQEDAiTHv0lqt4m12JZgyDkTqRQbVIj367Gxk35IPHo1s1bfTrKxu4RBp9a8R0 h8CMuQMK55Vg/o0panZKQzizPOBnV92K8lxukx9UIz3IvFsCV8CXoAxifaS025XI B8iFZw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ypQZ8hm2hKA29K8DLuR8Pgc3Plrx0rq3ZUjCK4mCV 1I=; b=PPkqqtEF1rG5DTMKO2nFpIg/gZWdBmAIStO/uiiQxkcIerdhROStciToM 63NNGk1133Q/40Ur37AzaNd4HQ+uuzBes++w9Imo78763NeM7oAiConiT8RSuB72 +pNga7o+gEtFA9T/WpqfrVk8H/NFHXeNOLfcNH8/0n3VDVYjggXBu/F3k+9RgDAs L0xNFvO941hPrCyylpVbWloSxxPVM/xV9BNO7OenPbD+suQRkWmEZDrPiGYAbdiy UUwAEeU5yOD1d+Y8lof/RPOWw8kCsnyjxt1ncykyCGJwMkZZpw9nShNDMUBuGtWp MZNTiQZAcw7QURU7TtBEM0eVNe1KA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeekgdekhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4A8973280060; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:57:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:57:42 +0200 Message-ID: <2844470.HTv9E7uqEf@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200805142141.32337-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com> References: <20200805142141.32337-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20200805142141.32337-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH 1/1] doc: add deprecation notice for CPU build flags X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 05/08/2020 16:21, Bruce Richardson: > The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAGS_* macros in DPDK build just duplicate info from > the compiler macros, so we can remove them and just use the compiler > versions directly. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > --- > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > +* build macros: The macros defining RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_* will be removed > + from the build. The information provided by these macros is available > + through standard compiler macros. For example, RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE3 > + duplicates the compiler-provided macro __SSE3__. I see 2 advantages of having alias: - if 2 compilers differ, we can manage - we can find all such macros with grep RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG