From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C65A04AC; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:53:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B678C1C0CB; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:53:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41011C0C3 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:53:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8195521E62; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:53:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 06:53:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=wH32XN000Ssj+RBpAb2FgeB4onVUNe9j4aI0sTLm1x8=; b=FTpTO3tVDfQA TbVCR5VUuPbiMvTTGlMO0V3CRcFU1nNCBeeBHO01NIBPvXr5AW7NWH6updzlnOuF 2o1V2kAexg+3WLZ6gCYLdzFRKZsDQ5OrY5jCn/L7DVQE6NJjPr4wsf8qM8kGTPOC jzYZNd15Y2CJX3joUp2Z/2qvhEu/L9A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=wH32XN000Ssj+RBpAb2FgeB4onVUNe9j4aI0sTLm1 x8=; b=got+s1Rt97fQRphehIvjN0St0MQCVW631gytcsLDgKMYaWhx/2bwsF++T QxxqBl+rPVU6wiYjBgHPnSOPr/2qvAmNIcB0CpgFHulWVPXsGcWLcv7c9a3Iefru M2FBafWxHKLZuhP/yHDTEBrutFw9wgf4rwvRWXJwoO01aG5GWkk5F0BvlgDjy8Bp NdxGcoWMBoaI48R9ro4+jDoEnnM++j7k/JdfsU30nCHvODcD1FIUpsqTyUuWBIxn 3W34XBNffrG2BtTzhZY01UjB8NSicY4coSnNW3uRLECsurs1yoMjz9VgBbxqJbgf DgFsByS1ie1r4QDxmkdO/+QOgQpiw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedruddujedgfeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 91257306005E; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:53:27 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "anatoly.burakov@intel.com" , "arybchenko@solarflare.com" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:53:26 +0100 Message-ID: <2859968.qWobp6VMaX@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20191021080324.10659-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> <13565750.zE2aRlbGEs@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] add IOVA=VA mode support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/11/2019 12:09, Vamsi Krishna Attunuru: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 05/11/2019 12:04, vattunuru@marvell.com: > > > Vamsi Attunuru (2): > > > kni: add IOVA=VA mode support > > > kni: add IOVA=VA support in kernel module > > > > Should the kernel support be the first patch? > > But required variable `iova_mode` is defined in first patch currently. > Either one is fine to me. Please let me know if want to put kernel support patch at first, I will send next version accordingly. > > > > > About the titles, can it be simply "support IOVA mode"? > > Yes, "support IOVA_VA mode" should be fine. I really dislike the name IOVA_VA. You mean support virtual IO addressing?