From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Stokes, Ian" <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
Andrzej Ostruszka <amo@semihalf.com>,
"techboard@dpdl.org" <techboard@dpdl.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] meter: provide experimental alias of API for old apps
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 16:24:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2865818.9VTjjQsp5K@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB293544B8CB4215B99EC34637EBB90@BYAPR11MB2935.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
19/05/2020 15:26, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >
> > On v20.02 some meter APIs have been matured and symbols moved from
> > EXPERIMENTAL to DPDK_20.0.1 block.
> >
> > This can break the applications that were using these mentioned APIs on
> > v19.11. Although there is no modification on the APIs and the action is
> > positive and matures the APIs, the affect can be negative to
> > applications.
> >
> > This patch provides aliasing by duplicating the existing and versioned
> > symbols as experimental.
> >
> > Since symbols moved from DPDK_20.0.1 to DPDK_21 block in the v20.05, the
> > aliasing done between EXPERIMENTAL and DPDK_21.
> >
> > With DPDK_21 ABI (DPDK v20.11) all aliasing will be removed and only
> > stable version of the APIs will remain.
> >
> > Fixes: 30512af820fe ("meter: remove experimental flag from RFC4115 trTCM
> > API")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
>
> Thanks, Ferruh and Ray!
>
> I am OK to let this is temporarily until release 20.11.
Applied, thanks
> Regarding the API breakage larger problem,
> this method only fixes the case of experimental APIs transitioning
> to non-experimental status with no modifications,
Yes
> but it does not handle the following possible cases:
>
> 1. Experimental APIs transitioning to non-experimental status with some modifications.
If there is a modification, it should mature as experimental first.
> 2. Experimental APIs being removed.
No guarantee that an experimental API remains forever.
> 3. Non-experimental APIs transitioning to deprecated status.
I don't think we need to deprecate experimental API.
We can change or remove them freely at any time.
> We need a clear procedure & timing for all these cases
> to avoid similar situations in the future.
> Likely a good topic for techboard discussion.
We can ask if there are different opinions.
I think the experimental status is quite clear: no guarantee.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-29 12:29 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] meter: fix ABI break due to experimental tag removal Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-29 14:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-01-29 14:57 ` Andrzej Ostruszka
2020-01-29 16:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-29 16:30 ` Andrzej Ostruszka
2020-01-29 16:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-29 16:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-29 17:49 ` Andrzej Ostruszka
2020-01-30 12:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-30 12:57 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-01-30 14:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-30 14:21 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-01-30 15:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-30 16:04 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-01-30 16:15 ` Eelco Chaudron
2020-01-30 20:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-03 11:10 ` Eelco Chaudron
2020-01-31 9:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-13 12:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] meter: provide experimental alias of API for old apps Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-13 16:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-13 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-13 18:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-14 8:44 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-14 11:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-14 11:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-14 15:10 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-14 15:32 ` David Marchand
2020-05-14 15:56 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-14 16:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-14 16:30 ` David Marchand
2020-05-14 16:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-15 13:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-15 14:41 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-15 15:03 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-15 14:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] abi: " Ray Kinsella
2020-05-15 15:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Ray Kinsella
2020-05-16 11:53 ` Neil Horman
2020-05-18 17:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-18 17:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-18 17:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-18 18:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-19 14:13 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-19 14:14 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-17 19:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] meter: " Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-05-18 6:29 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-18 9:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-18 9:30 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-18 10:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-18 11:18 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-05-18 11:49 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-18 11:48 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-18 12:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-18 13:06 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-05-18 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-19 12:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-19 13:26 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-05-19 14:24 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-05-19 14:22 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-02-02 18:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] meter: fix ABI break due to experimental tag removal Neil Horman
2020-02-03 12:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-04 12:02 ` Neil Horman
2020-02-05 10:04 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-02-05 11:32 ` Neil Horman
2020-02-13 17:40 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-02-14 2:40 ` Neil Horman
2020-02-14 11:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-02-14 20:48 ` Neil Horman
2020-02-14 21:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-02-15 13:43 ` Neil Horman
2020-02-17 14:23 ` Ray Kinsella
2020-02-17 15:37 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2865818.9VTjjQsp5K@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=amo@semihalf.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).