From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
Cc: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
"Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"shreyansh.jain@nxp.com" <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
"Patel, Amol" <amol.patel@intel.com>,
"Padubidri, Sanjay A" <sanjay.padubidri@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] doc: add guide for debug and troubleshoot
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:59:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2883718.iZx1J08iSk@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D2F76D5@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>
28/01/2019 15:51, Varghese, Vipin:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> snipped
> >
> > I feel this doc will be updated to provide a complete debug checklist,
> Attempt is made to capture commonly seen filed issue. Saying so, I am clear that I will not be able to identify all debug check list. As time, experience and sharing increases (from the community), I am certain sure this will grow
Yes this is what I mean.
We just need to give a good start by explaining well the intent and context.
> > > +Debug & Troubleshoot guide via PMD
> > > +==================================
> >
> > Why "via PMD"? Do we use PMD for troubleshooting?
> I believe yes, we do collect information with enhanced procinfo tool.
>
> > Or is it dedicated to troubleshoot the PMD behaviour?
> I am not clear with this statement. Hence is the query 'Is this dedicated to troubleshooting Application. PMD and Library uses cases?'
Sorry I don't understand.
I think you can just remove "via PMD" in the title.
[...]
> > > + * single primary
> > > + * multiple primary
> > > + * single primary single secondary
> > > + * single primary multiple secondary
> > > +
> > > +In all the above cases, it is a tedious task to isolate, debug and
> > > +understand odd behaviour which occurs randomly or periodically. The
> > > +goal of guide is to share and explore a few commonly seen patterns
> > > +and behaviour. Then, isolate and identify the root cause via step by
> > > +step debug at various processing stages.
> >
> > I don't understand how this introduction is related to "via PMD" in the title.
> I believe the information is shared ```The goal of guide is to share and explore a few commonly seen patterns and behaviour. Then, isolate and identify the root cause via step by step debug at various processing stages.'```
>
> There would multiple ways to design application for solving a same problem. These are depended on user, platform, scaling factor and target. These various combinations make use PMD and libraries. Misconfiguration and not taking care of platform will cause throttling and even drops.
>
> Example: application designed to run on single is now been deployed to run on multi NUMA model.
Yes, so you are explaining there can be a lot of different scenarios.
[...]
> > > +#. Linux 64-bit|32-bit
> > > +#. DPDK PMD and libraries are used
> >
> > Isn't it always the case with DPDK?
> >
> > > +#. Libraries and PMD are either static or shared. But not both
> >
> > Strange assumption. Why would it be both?
> If applications are only build with DPDK libraries, then yes the assumption is correct. But when applications are build using DPDK as one of software layer (example DPDK network stack, DPDK suricata, DPDK hyperscan) as per my understanding this is not true.
Sorry I don't understand.
The DPDK libraries are either shared or static, but never mixed.
Anyway why is it significant here?
> > > +#. Machine flag optimizations of gcc or compiler are made constant
> >
> > What do you mean?
> I can reword as ```DPDK and the application libraries are built with same flags. ```
Why is it significant?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 7:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] doc: add svg for debug and troubleshoot guide Vipin Varghese
2018-11-26 7:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: add guide for debug and troubleshoot Vipin Varghese
2019-01-04 6:37 ` Shreyansh Jain
2019-01-04 7:01 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-01-16 14:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] doci/howto: add debug and troubleshoot guide Vipin Varghese
2019-01-16 14:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] doc: add svg for " Vipin Varghese
2019-01-16 14:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] doc: add guide for debug and troubleshoot Vipin Varghese
2019-01-18 15:28 ` Kovacevic, Marko
2019-01-21 3:38 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-01-21 10:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] doc/howto: add debug and troubleshoot guide Vipin Varghese
2019-01-21 10:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] doc: add svg for " Vipin Varghese
2019-01-28 1:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-28 14:28 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-02-19 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] guide to debug and troubleshoot Vipin Varghese
2019-02-19 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] doc: add svg for debug and troubleshoot guide Vipin Varghese
2019-02-19 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] doc: add guide for debug and troubleshoot Vipin Varghese
2019-02-25 11:34 ` Mcnamara, John
2019-02-25 15:46 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-01-21 10:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Vipin Varghese
2019-01-28 1:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-28 14:51 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-01-28 15:59 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-02-08 9:21 ` Varghese, Vipin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2883718.iZx1J08iSk@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=amol.patel@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=sanjay.padubidri@intel.com \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).