From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1F0A0537; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:00:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279E01C22C; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:00:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF171C226 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:00:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 014HxMIg091522 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:00:24 -0500 Received: from ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (aa.5b.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.91.170]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xybyxvcx6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:00:23 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 014I0DnP015497 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:00:23 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma02wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2xw0y6bcgj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:00:23 +0000 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 014I0MhZ54460754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:00:22 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982E2AC05F; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:00:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CE5AC060; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:00:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davids-mbp.usor.ibm.com (unknown [9.163.10.162]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:00:22 +0000 (GMT) To: Thinh Tran , dev@dpdk.org References: <20200128210233.691-1-thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200131220336.103874-1-thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: David Christensen Message-ID: <28a022d4-d17c-9922-924f-966bc23559cc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:00:21 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200131220336.103874-1-thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-04_06:2020-02-04, 2020-02-04 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=696 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2002040120 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/ppc64: improve rte_rdtsc with ppc_get_timebase X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > __ppc_get_timebase() is GNU extension and is more efficient > > v2: Advoid breaking other ppc_64 flatforms. The __ppc_get_timebase() > seems to be specific to powerpc platform and with GLIBC. > > Signed-off-by: Thinh Tran Reviewed-by: David Christensen