From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Igor Russkikh <Igor.Russkikh@aquantia.com>,
"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Pavel Belous <Pavel.Belous@aquantia.com>,
Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] ethdev: introduce MACSEC device ops
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:22:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2900506.7bG6BaBg05@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <455dcd32-d2a5-776b-9883-3112db2e9e3c@aquantia.com>
12/04/2019 10:50, Igor Russkikh:
>
> >>> Please can you explain how it is related to rte_security?
> >>
> >> It is not.
> >> Do you mean macsec control API could be moved and logically be a part of rte_security api?
> >> I can't comment now on how feasible is this. Moreover this depends on how Intel considers
> >> and uses the existing macsec offload in ixgbe.
> >
> > There are RTE_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_MACSEC and rte_security_macsec_* structs
> > in librte_security.
> > Please check how it can be used while defining an ethdev API.
>
> There is nothing in rte_security defined explicitly for macsec except that enum item.
> All the macsec structures are dummy. Was there any intent to implement this?
>
> I can writeup the generic macsec structures for rte_security, do you think that's feasible?
I don't know. We are in front of a case of dead code
written well too far in advance.
Akhil, any suggestion?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-12 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 11:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] add MACSEC hw offload to atlantic PMD Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] ethdev: introduce MACSEC device ops Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 11:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-11 12:37 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-11 12:37 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-11 21:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-11 21:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-12 8:50 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-12 8:50 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-12 11:22 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-04-12 11:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-12 18:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 18:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-13 7:24 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-13 7:24 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-16 9:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-16 9:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-16 9:58 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-16 9:58 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-16 10:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-16 10:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-16 10:19 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-16 10:19 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/10] app/testpmd: use generic MACSEC API calls Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 11:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/10] net/ixgbe: macsec callbacks implementation Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/10] net/atlantic: macsec hardware structures declaration Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/10] net/atlantic: macsec configuration code Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:18 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/10] net/atlantic: macsec firmware interface Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] net/atlantic: interrupt handling of macsec events Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/10] net/atlantic: implement macsec statistics Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/10] net/atlantic: bump internal driver version Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/10] net/atlantic: indicate macsec in NIC docs Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:19 ` Igor Russkikh
2019-04-10 11:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 11:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2900506.7bG6BaBg05@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=Igor.Russkikh@aquantia.com \
--cc=Pavel.Belous@aquantia.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).