From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Somalapuram Amaranath <asomalap@amd.com>,
Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
John Griffin <john.griffin@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
Michael Shamis <michaelsh@marvell.com>,
Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>,
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>,
Jay Zhou <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
ArkadiuszX Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
"sashakot@nvidia.com" <sashakot@nvidia.com>,
"oren@nvidia.com" <oren@nvidia.com>,
Shiri Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>,
david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: support multiple cipher data-units
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:39:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2938273.EbuWGXm2bp@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR18MB2284817B87E3563B9CFEC2F4D84F9@MW2PR18MB2284.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
13/04/2021 14:02, Akhil Goyal:
> > All the new fields do not change the size of their structures.
>
> Please check that the CI is failing. I see that ignore exception is present in
> devtools/libabigail.abignore For rte_cryptodev. But not sure why this is still
> failing. Can you check?
There are 2 new fields:
- rte_cryptodev_symmetric_capability.cipher.dataunit_set
- rte_crypto_cipher_xform.dataunit_len
This is how the struct sizes are affected (before / after):
struct \ arch | 32-bit | 64-bit |
-----------------------------------|---------|---------|
rte_cryptodev_symmetric_capability | 36 / 36 | 36 / 36 |
rte_crypto_cipher_xform | 20 / 24 | 32 / 32 |
There is no change in rte_cryptodev_symmetric_capability because
the field is added in a light branch of the union.
The 64-bit size of rte_crypto_cipher_xform is unchanged (32)
because there were 4 padding bytes at the end (28 + 4).
But the 32-bit version has not such padding at the end,
so there is a breakage.
The only hole in 32-bit rte_crypto_cipher_xform is
2 bytes between key and iv.
Can we define dataunit_len as uint16_t?
The other side to check when playing with the ABI
is the default value of the holes for the new field.
The driver must work properly in case the application
did not explicitly set the new fields.
In general it means the compatible API should have memset(0).
In this case, it seems the new fields will be used only
in a new mlx5 driver, so it should be OK for now.
But usage of the new fields in an existing driver must
be checked carefully during the compatibility period.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 14:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: support multiple cipher block sizes Matan Azrad
2021-02-05 16:50 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-02-08 12:10 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-02-08 13:36 ` Matan Azrad
2021-02-08 15:28 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-02-08 18:23 ` Matan Azrad
2021-02-26 7:50 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-02-26 5:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Anoob Joseph
2021-03-01 7:55 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-01 9:29 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2021-03-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: support multiple cipher data-units Matan Azrad
2021-04-04 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Matan Azrad
[not found] ` <20210404150809.2154241-1-matan@nvidia.com>
2021-04-13 12:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-04-13 16:39 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-04-13 18:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-13 19:48 ` Matan Azrad
2021-04-13 20:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-14 18:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-04-14 19:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-14 19:43 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-04-14 20:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-14 20:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce extension of crypto data-unit length Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-17 19:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-07-31 17:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-31 18:58 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ajit Khaparde
2021-08-02 11:10 ` Matan Azrad
2021-08-02 12:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-14 20:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] cryptodev: support multiple cipher data-units Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-15 8:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-04-15 19:01 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-04-15 19:31 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2938273.EbuWGXm2bp@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=john.griffin@intel.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=michaelsh@marvell.com \
--cc=oren@nvidia.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=sashakot@nvidia.com \
--cc=shirik@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).