From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2393A2B9D for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:11:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id q128so60368168wma.1 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:11:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SpyJNxsRiheusUzPCBTntCiT1IzqFUu7S+PZxD1DhBY=; b=Kw+UuBJjzX0Zp6c+iIgbJyy3fjjV/zrEpUT5oiKauSW70UUgAJ23RzPz6+uVyg9nvD BqNDUktwejONeZ9icslfe7T/gkEynJLHg+uaJS4+Js+UIsnNg6uz7fT3dGeoOP/Vki6y DcaUPkmrK/M61I7JhL34NV7FDL2G+ePiUAEQ0wTtZd6qC3cEQgS0uiQ6bPacQbPjmJLO lKLpEFuKWzkCxbBqWJl5XdxWhc1g20HZAgA6Th3qWW26Pj5QjF+/EHNrP8wSSW2csGzI T4RIKkWAc0xbqbC9uSMNPXgY34I0FmC/sabp94OyelOph0dviD2Ad7OGxa6eXFe9v0vU edzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SpyJNxsRiheusUzPCBTntCiT1IzqFUu7S+PZxD1DhBY=; b=I1ZW9IVOgLk2UbJHm/l5YVEj89rOEm898zXETCXeJGH63Ap2aCh2d3kFhRcmn3ILMv CAbMpWvmtbawEC++WuUhtX82RMAmzUccBK4zQh6j/4FGAaN3YF3kBOd5Xy4fTgOO9qyk ub4e3p47oYMG7/yDRND906vmEv+P+rStkKnW9GeNb2vXw9406M9+Q6z7hvV/2DK/S7tH lfPBQhiUacEdjbtM8UB0iiIjxYktcQqqyg7du8sO8fdNtLLXK0QXlnJNKwz8aGc98vLJ NhP8rrulthcoZTqjLQ2Ph0gP7pjAlrOocTHIXO+XaS5Wf+QKuSTj5wFIRiRCHL8MPq7d 1/ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKP2c4E9v7Xqf3HUWjoifHaIOIrlF2NzW/cTa6f6dWwrpcqzMC3eSUzXCZJHdF7N9JP X-Received: by 10.28.29.211 with SMTP id d202mr11393303wmd.64.1469027506877; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lh10sm1721518wjc.12.2016.07.20.08.11.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Tootoonchian, Amin" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Kerlin, MarcinX" Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: <29406326.BbypyUUmXA@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E215172927@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E21516DF5D@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <68D830D942438745AD09BAFA99E33E812746D0@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <5905C8E33883CA46A8878E2D7724E215172927@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:11:47 -0000 Hi, 2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin: > Thomas, your thoughts? I have 2 thoughts: - it is too big for 16.07 - it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;) Sorry I won't look at it shortly.