From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDCCA0A02; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:03:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD011140E48; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:03:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wnew2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wnew2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A55140E37 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:03:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238EA1A21; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:03:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:03:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= N2Gw8puDSj5ojd2xLAglcvt8gfnSImwsR7/q5UiKttw=; b=IwxSFJnRctAHxFk3 qVrZFKH8pLJ7ghHelT6j0CLfQMO12n3g05owqPuusvLn3VkfpFjlSVbgD2gRkjap HuozFJro/wi+PH2yqFiy4ZcC1BdhZiZ1mx01EBT5TGX70gUjubnZZqm4HNXVgqY9 3ydu6glgeeGcPhHJLFsN3nGhHCbhyLh0OkGALfUHC7s7vu3Pxke7eXpR0Y6HGV7Y J45GE7vAE4sP/5/hkcYYso1GFaHICnprAWyjqeuNcZk7D2Mz9pzZC/kyzgntqdyV QKAzWOpwMKi9ANR3lJNzbD1HwIOodnu7wViaWw7IzGiapqUA3tzbJ0DXM6674v/p uW84jQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=N2Gw8puDSj5ojd2xLAglcvt8gfnSImwsR7/q5UiKt tw=; b=SwRNUoYCPaSldrQZBBfuCxEeCdm08OhmI6MrFsJ5ZyiNPFZnciPvPhMa/ 7xbLpeLTI6AgKUT1jicQvp3qQpkvsZX77GRLxu7CvR5oHifRbaJXsfh8XO851Ve9 //bQ0u4T7mn5vPFg7BbQwBm/5BsPDd4RJGd+njsiOPmGlSKfgbs5vBakdUAQcgQl mGp+N7D9d4Vr86SAKI+4iOT7GbSXZ2kjbTglC1Qytn+3lMcuit7jE7rUBM4ipFgz oNPcQNLKQdG/ibd0vlz6ebl5Cb6FrHwJBE9kbonmN6JaHmGtMcBZiVHX5+qev+uf jXPWzD0M5Xa+O0l1ei2bkEEA/gTjw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudejvddgudeffecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 82ADA24005C; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:03:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru Cc: Tejasree Kondoj , Radu Nicolau , Konstantin Ananyev , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , Akhil Goyal , Tejasree Kondoj , Anoob Joseph , Ankur Dwivedi , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 21:03:15 +0200 Message-ID: <2953193.rIsFC5KHW7@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210401112623.20951-1-ktejasree@marvell.com> <20210401112623.20951-3-ktejasree@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mbuf: add packet type for UDP-ESP tunnel packets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 05/04/2021 20:11, Akhil Goyal: > > Adding new mbuf packet type for UDP encapsulated > > ESP packets. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejasree Kondoj > > --- > > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst | 5 +++++ > > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_ptype.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+) > > > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal > > ++Olivier > > Thomas, > Can this patch be part of crypto tree if acked by Olivier? Yes, adding a packet type is OK if reviewed by Olivier or Andrew. Olivier, Andrew, please could you review?