* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-20 14:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function Michal Jastrzebski
@ 2016-07-21 14:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-21 20:50 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
2016-07-21 14:37 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-22 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Michal Jastrzebski
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-07-21 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Jastrzebski
Cc: dev, bruce.richardson, michalx.kobylinski,
sergio.gonzalez.monroy, david.marchand
Hi,
2016-07-20 16:24, Michal Jastrzebski:
> - if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
> +
> + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
> + if (retval < 0) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap: %s\n",
> __func__, strerror(errno));
> close(fd);
> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> + } else if (retval >= 0 && retval < (int)sizeof(uint64_t)) {
I have 4 comments about the above line:
- the check retval >= 0 is not needed because implied by else
- why not checking retval != sizeof(uint64_t) as it is the exact expected value?
- (int)sizeof(uint64_t) can be replaced by 8 but it's shorter ;)
- only 1 space is required between } and else
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from /proc/self/pagemap "
> + "but expected %d: %s\n",
> + __func__, retval, (int)sizeof(uint64_t), strerror(errno));
Are you sure errno is meaningful here?
> + close(fd);
> + return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-21 14:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2016-07-21 20:50 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
2016-07-21 23:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jastrzebski, MichalX K @ 2016-07-21 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev, Richardson, Bruce, Kobylinski, MichalX, Gonzalez Monroy,
Sergio, david.marchand
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 4:36 PM
> To: Jastrzebski, MichalX K <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
> Kobylinski, MichalX <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>; Gonzalez Monroy,
> Sergio <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>; david.marchand@6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read
> function
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016-07-20 16:24, Michal Jastrzebski:
> > - if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
> > +
> > + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
> > + if (retval < 0) {
> > RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap:
> %s\n",
> > __func__, strerror(errno));
> > close(fd);
> > return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > + } else if (retval >= 0 && retval < (int)sizeof(uint64_t)) {
>
Hi Thomas,
> I have 4 comments about the above line:
That's too much for one line. I should improve next time:)
> - the check retval >= 0 is not needed because implied by else
> - why not checking retval != sizeof(uint64_t) as it is the exact expected
> value?
Yes, it is better solution,
> - (int)sizeof(uint64_t) can be replaced by 8 but it's shorter ;)
I didn't want to change all invokes of read() function here.
I can use some macro:
#define PFN_MASK_SIZE 8
How do You think?
> - only 1 space is required between } and else
>
> > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from
> /proc/self/pagemap "
> > + "but expected %d: %s\n",
> > + __func__, retval, (int)sizeof(uint64_t),
> strerror(errno));
>
> Are you sure errno is meaningful here?
I think it is not. Will send v2.
>
> > + close(fd);
> > + return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > }
Thanks for a review
Michal.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-21 20:50 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
@ 2016-07-21 23:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-07-21 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jastrzebski, MichalX K
Cc: dev, Richardson, Bruce, Kobylinski, MichalX, Gonzalez Monroy,
Sergio, david.marchand
2016-07-21 20:50, Jastrzebski, MichalX K:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > - (int)sizeof(uint64_t) can be replaced by 8 but it's shorter ;)
>
> I didn't want to change all invokes of read() function here.
> I can use some macro:
> #define PFN_MASK_SIZE 8
> How do You think?
Yes may be an idea.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-20 14:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function Michal Jastrzebski
2016-07-21 14:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2016-07-21 14:37 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-22 14:38 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
2016-07-22 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Michal Jastrzebski
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy @ 2016-07-21 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Jastrzebski, bruce.richardson
Cc: dev, michalx.kobylinski, david.marchand
On 20/07/2016 15:24, Michal Jastrzebski wrote:
> In rte_mem_virt2phy: Value returned from a function and indicating the
> number of bytes was ignored. This could cause a wrong pfn (page frame
> number) mask read from pagemap file.
> When read returns less than the number of sizeof(uint64_t) bytes,
> function rte_mem_virt2phy returns error.
>
> Coverity issue: 13212
> Fixes: 40b966a211ab ("ivshmem: library changes for mmaping using
> ivshmem").
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Jastrzebski <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> index 42a29fa..05769fb 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ rte_mem_lock_page(const void *virt)
> phys_addr_t
> rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> {
> - int fd;
> + int fd, retval;
> uint64_t page, physaddr;
> unsigned long virt_pfn;
> int page_size;
> @@ -209,11 +209,19 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> close(fd);
> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> }
> - if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
> +
> + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
> + if (retval < 0) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap: %s\n",
> __func__, strerror(errno));
> close(fd);
> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> + } else if (retval >= 0 && retval < (int)sizeof(uint64_t)) {
Just a couple of nits, retval >= 0 it's already implicit, no need to do
that check.
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from /proc/self/pagemap "
> + "but expected %d: %s\n",
> + __func__, retval, (int)sizeof(uint64_t), strerror(errno));
> + close(fd);
Another nit, we could just close(fd) right after read, regardless of
read being success or error as
we close(fd) also on success just before exiting the function.
Other than that:
Acked-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
> + return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> }
>
> /*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-21 14:37 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
@ 2016-07-22 14:38 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jastrzebski, MichalX K @ 2016-07-22 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio, Richardson, Bruce
Cc: dev, Kobylinski, MichalX, david.marchand
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 4:37 PM
> To: Jastrzebski, MichalX K <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>; Richardson,
> Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kobylinski, MichalX <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>;
> david.marchand@6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
>
> On 20/07/2016 15:24, Michal Jastrzebski wrote:
> > In rte_mem_virt2phy: Value returned from a function and indicating the
> > number of bytes was ignored. This could cause a wrong pfn (page frame
> > number) mask read from pagemap file.
> > When read returns less than the number of sizeof(uint64_t) bytes,
> > function rte_mem_virt2phy returns error.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 13212
> > Fixes: 40b966a211ab ("ivshmem: library changes for mmaping using
> > ivshmem").
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Jastrzebski <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> > index 42a29fa..05769fb 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ rte_mem_lock_page(const void *virt)
> > phys_addr_t
> > rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> > {
> > - int fd;
> > + int fd, retval;
> > uint64_t page, physaddr;
> > unsigned long virt_pfn;
> > int page_size;
> > @@ -209,11 +209,19 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> > close(fd);
> > return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > }
> > - if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
> > +
> > + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
> > + if (retval < 0) {
> > RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap:
> %s\n",
> > __func__, strerror(errno));
> > close(fd);
> > return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > + } else if (retval >= 0 && retval < (int)sizeof(uint64_t)) {
>
> Just a couple of nits, retval >= 0 it's already implicit, no need to do
> that check.
>
> > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from
> /proc/self/pagemap "
> > + "but expected %d: %s\n",
> > + __func__, retval, (int)sizeof(uint64_t),
> strerror(errno));
> > + close(fd);
>
> Another nit, we could just close(fd) right after read, regardless of
> read being success or error as
> we close(fd) also on success just before exiting the function.
>
> Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
>
> > + return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > }
> >
> > /*
Thanks Sergio,
I have sent v2 with the changes that You suggest
Michal.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-20 14:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function Michal Jastrzebski
2016-07-21 14:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-21 14:37 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
@ 2016-07-22 14:33 ` Michal Jastrzebski
2016-07-22 15:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Michal Jastrzebski @ 2016-07-22 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bruce.richardson
Cc: dev, michalx.kobylinski, sergio.gonzalez.monroy, david.marchand,
thomas.monjalon
v2:
-moved close(fd) just after read.
-when read() from fd we expect 8 bytes, so PFN_MASK_SIZE macro
was introduced instead sizeof(uint64_t).
-removed errno print when read returns less than 8 bytes
In rte_mem_virt2phy: Value returned from a function and indicating the
number of bytes was ignored. This could cause a wrong pfn (page frame
number) mask read from pagemap file.
When read returns less than the number of sizeof(uint64_t) bytes,
function rte_mem_virt2phy returns error.
Coverity issue: 13212
Fixes: 40b966a211ab ("ivshmem: library changes for mmaping using
ivshmem").
Signed-off-by: Michal Jastrzebski <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
index 42a29fa..e20a38c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@
#include "eal_filesystem.h"
#include "eal_hugepages.h"
+#define PFN_MASK_SIZE 8
+
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_XEN_DOM0
int rte_xen_dom0_supported(void)
{
@@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ rte_mem_lock_page(const void *virt)
phys_addr_t
rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
{
- int fd;
+ int fd, retval;
uint64_t page, physaddr;
unsigned long virt_pfn;
int page_size;
@@ -209,10 +211,19 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
close(fd);
return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
}
- if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
+
+ retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
+ close(fd);
+ if (retval < 0) {
RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap: %s\n",
__func__, strerror(errno));
- close(fd);
+
+ return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
+ } else if (retval != PFN_MASK_SIZE) {
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from /proc/self/pagemap "
+ "but expected %d:\n",
+ __func__, retval, PFN_MASK_SIZE);
+
return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
}
@@ -222,7 +233,7 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
*/
physaddr = ((page & 0x7fffffffffffffULL) * page_size)
+ ((unsigned long)virtaddr % page_size);
- close(fd);
+
return physaddr;
}
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-22 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Michal Jastrzebski
@ 2016-07-22 15:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-22 16:02 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-22 16:23 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-07-22 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Jastrzebski
Cc: bruce.richardson, dev, michalx.kobylinski,
sergio.gonzalez.monroy, david.marchand
2016-07-22 16:33, Michal Jastrzebski:
> v2:
> -moved close(fd) just after read.
> -when read() from fd we expect 8 bytes, so PFN_MASK_SIZE macro
> was introduced instead sizeof(uint64_t).
> -removed errno print when read returns less than 8 bytes
Looks better.
Note: this changelog should be below --- to avoid appearing in
the commit.
> In rte_mem_virt2phy: Value returned from a function and indicating the
> number of bytes was ignored. This could cause a wrong pfn (page frame
> number) mask read from pagemap file.
> When read returns less than the number of sizeof(uint64_t) bytes,
> function rte_mem_virt2phy returns error.
Better title to explain the issue:
mem: fix check of physical address retrieval
> +#define PFN_MASK_SIZE 8
> +
> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_XEN_DOM0
> int rte_xen_dom0_supported(void)
> {
> @@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ rte_mem_lock_page(const void *virt)
> phys_addr_t
> rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> {
> - int fd;
> + int fd, retval;
> uint64_t page, physaddr;
> unsigned long virt_pfn;
> int page_size;
> @@ -209,10 +211,19 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> close(fd);
> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> }
> - if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
> +
> + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
We could use PFN_MASK_SIZE here
> + close(fd);
> + if (retval < 0) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap: %s\n",
> __func__, strerror(errno));
> - close(fd);
> +
useless whitespace
> + return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> + } else if (retval != PFN_MASK_SIZE) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from /proc/self/pagemap "
> + "but expected %d:\n",
> + __func__, retval, PFN_MASK_SIZE);
> +
useless whitespace
> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> }
>
> @@ -222,7 +233,7 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> */
> physaddr = ((page & 0x7fffffffffffffULL) * page_size)
> + ((unsigned long)virtaddr % page_size);
> - close(fd);
> +
> return physaddr;
> }
If you and Sergio agree, I can make the minor changes before applying.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-22 15:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2016-07-22 16:02 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-22 16:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-22 16:23 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy @ 2016-07-22 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: bruce.richardson, dev, michalx.kobylinski, david.marchand,
Michal Jastrzebski
On 22/07/2016 16:24, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-07-22 16:33, Michal Jastrzebski:
>> v2:
>> -moved close(fd) just after read.
>> -when read() from fd we expect 8 bytes, so PFN_MASK_SIZE macro
>> was introduced instead sizeof(uint64_t).
>> -removed errno print when read returns less than 8 bytes
> Looks better.
> Note: this changelog should be below --- to avoid appearing in
> the commit.
>
>> In rte_mem_virt2phy: Value returned from a function and indicating the
>> number of bytes was ignored. This could cause a wrong pfn (page frame
>> number) mask read from pagemap file.
>> When read returns less than the number of sizeof(uint64_t) bytes,
>> function rte_mem_virt2phy returns error.
> Better title to explain the issue:
> mem: fix check of physical address retrieval
>
>> +#define PFN_MASK_SIZE 8
>> +
>> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_XEN_DOM0
>> int rte_xen_dom0_supported(void)
>> {
>> @@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ rte_mem_lock_page(const void *virt)
>> phys_addr_t
>> rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
>> {
>> - int fd;
>> + int fd, retval;
>> uint64_t page, physaddr;
>> unsigned long virt_pfn;
>> int page_size;
>> @@ -209,10 +211,19 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
>> close(fd);
>> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
>> }
>> - if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
>> +
>> + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
> We could use PFN_MASK_SIZE here
>
>> + close(fd);
>> + if (retval < 0) {
>> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap: %s\n",
>> __func__, strerror(errno));
>> - close(fd);
>> +
> useless whitespace
>
>> + return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
>> + } else if (retval != PFN_MASK_SIZE) {
>> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from /proc/self/pagemap "
>> + "but expected %d:\n",
>> + __func__, retval, PFN_MASK_SIZE);
>> +
> useless whitespace
>
>> return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -222,7 +233,7 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
>> */
>> physaddr = ((page & 0x7fffffffffffffULL) * page_size)
>> + ((unsigned long)virtaddr % page_size);
>> - close(fd);
>> +
>> return physaddr;
>> }
> If you and Sergio agree, I can make the minor changes before applying.
Go for it!
Sergio
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-22 16:02 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
@ 2016-07-22 16:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-07-22 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Jastrzebski
Cc: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy, bruce.richardson, dev,
michalx.kobylinski, david.marchand
2016-07-22 17:02, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> On 22/07/2016 16:24, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-07-22 16:33, Michal Jastrzebski:
> >> v2:
> >> -moved close(fd) just after read.
> >> -when read() from fd we expect 8 bytes, so PFN_MASK_SIZE macro
> >> was introduced instead sizeof(uint64_t).
> >> -removed errno print when read returns less than 8 bytes
> > Looks better.
[...]
> > Better title to explain the issue:
> > mem: fix check of physical address retrieval
[...]
> >> + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
> > We could use PFN_MASK_SIZE here
[...]
> > useless whitespace
[...]
> > If you and Sergio agree, I can make the minor changes before applying.
>
> Go for it!
Applied with above changes, thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
2016-07-22 15:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-22 16:02 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
@ 2016-07-22 16:23 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jastrzebski, MichalX K @ 2016-07-22 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: Richardson, Bruce, dev, Kobylinski, MichalX, Gonzalez Monroy,
Sergio, david.marchand
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 5:25 PM
> To: Jastrzebski, MichalX K <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> Kobylinski, MichalX <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>; Gonzalez Monroy,
> Sergio <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>; david.marchand@6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal: fix check number of bytes from read function
>
> 2016-07-22 16:33, Michal Jastrzebski:
> > v2:
> > -moved close(fd) just after read.
> > -when read() from fd we expect 8 bytes, so PFN_MASK_SIZE macro
> > was introduced instead sizeof(uint64_t).
> > -removed errno print when read returns less than 8 bytes
>
> Looks better.
> Note: this changelog should be below --- to avoid appearing in
> the commit.
>
> > In rte_mem_virt2phy: Value returned from a function and indicating the
> > number of bytes was ignored. This could cause a wrong pfn (page frame
> > number) mask read from pagemap file.
> > When read returns less than the number of sizeof(uint64_t) bytes,
> > function rte_mem_virt2phy returns error.
>
> Better title to explain the issue:
> mem: fix check of physical address retrieval
>
> > +#define PFN_MASK_SIZE 8
> > +
> > #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_XEN_DOM0
> > int rte_xen_dom0_supported(void)
> > {
> > @@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ rte_mem_lock_page(const void *virt)
> > phys_addr_t
> > rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> > {
> > - int fd;
> > + int fd, retval;
> > uint64_t page, physaddr;
> > unsigned long virt_pfn;
> > int page_size;
> > @@ -209,10 +211,19 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> > close(fd);
> > return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > }
> > - if (read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t)) < 0) {
> > +
> > + retval = read(fd, &page, sizeof(uint64_t));
>
> We could use PFN_MASK_SIZE here
>
> > + close(fd);
> > + if (retval < 0) {
> > RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): cannot read /proc/self/pagemap:
> %s\n",
> > __func__, strerror(errno));
> > - close(fd);
> > +
>
> useless whitespace
>
> > + return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > + } else if (retval != PFN_MASK_SIZE) {
> > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): read %d bytes from
> /proc/self/pagemap "
> > + "but expected %d:\n",
> > + __func__, retval, PFN_MASK_SIZE);
> > +
>
> useless whitespace
>
> > return RTE_BAD_PHYS_ADDR;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -222,7 +233,7 @@ rte_mem_virt2phy(const void *virtaddr)
> > */
> > physaddr = ((page & 0x7fffffffffffffULL) * page_size)
> > + ((unsigned long)virtaddr % page_size);
> > - close(fd);
> > +
> > return physaddr;
> > }
>
> If you and Sergio agree, I can make the minor changes before applying.
Thanks Thomas. Please apply.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread