From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f179.google.com (mail-wj0-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4072E83 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:04:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f179.google.com with SMTP id tk12so14120022wjb.3 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:04:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zpEMoIHSw1gMuVpLFMrMY4doZczpAaP3OEvPc4jOD68=; b=yNRwSLzcxgzzsm2U/JBnDTsTVu/mrO/+zoRK3iIRHEBTbrACMinEwkU6Lswk34s3sf gkAheNIeX+1EuQaUIU+iwSLo/bXIJ4qvQxpA4iFSODB9jvju9IkskWn4XjURnTW4MmOS /El7VE4iyiWRFQJBNnATkXgmGPR1UpbZMlCkfdbtsD7/pk1ystfgushB+O74SzcKYL66 Pz8xcszpc2Csg6AVET3VnJIRX18J989SYtaOsss2qrgcYtXNneBLr4M5/EsAm7NTED8C qaP+lRc0Wpy1JjN051Abxh0hcb0phSfRQsVJsU3eSx5/HNkQPz8KZhboO/lik3ZPOy9k rEfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zpEMoIHSw1gMuVpLFMrMY4doZczpAaP3OEvPc4jOD68=; b=jQJQEtWcVZy5h1WmOUoSqeTkEZDpEwzU+cZySSAYBF7K69HKEgkawnfwUjjUkLK8sY 5nrJKq9TYpB/BwOY/f7FVtBnspCokNVYEFUIaNRu8pethkOTfNi5doZ72yqSJejmm8oE WcpvhSdU1P3+xRRcPuWX+jGyyRXg28T+qzWji+pQVnc41B1ouEtkBHJ07GRCouOsBkib tRxFCGGPKUvG/gMimDyGRb/t79MklXvMOEHs0kufhfByglWy2wJ2DnH3bD7sW+L/B5C1 05M0cenMM1uwOVatGNgud3hh0Gnsvu74xJxl4QH7eey3cU7OQ1N1Bg5BmQR+J3FQ7LjF DpxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02s0XUKPiw0VnGBmuFB7EJV/wAP/629kZoHXjmoX+LwntCIkOmYOEuLtu+Re+Kzcx8V X-Received: by 10.195.30.165 with SMTP id kf5mr67899630wjd.41.1481288674803; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:04:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q65sm20504161wmd.6.2016.12.09.05.04.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:04:34 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Iremonger, Bernard" Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 14:04:32 +0100 Message-ID: <29626520.OD9qkZZgkn@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D0601D@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1481282878-26176-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D0601D@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] net/ixgbe: move set VF functions. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 13:04:36 -0000 2016-12-09 12:00, Iremonger, Bernard: > From: Yigit, Ferruh > > Why this patchset doesn't remove ethdev updates for these functions? > > > > ixgbe is the only user for these eth-dev_ops, since code moved to ixgbe > > driver, they and relevant rte_eth_xx functions (and deprecation notice) can > > be removed in this patchset. Most probably after testpmd updated to > > prevent compilation errors. > > My understanding is that the functions should be copied and reworked before being removed from the ethdev, and that the removal should be done in a separate patch set. > > Hi Thomas, > > Could you clarify please. It was announced that these functions will be removed, so they can be safely removed in 17.02, right? In this case, it is a code move: copy, rework and delete in the same patch. And yes, the deprecation notice must be removed at the same time.