From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6986C568A for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:16:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id g62so21958917wme.0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 03:16:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=ggVjUb0zZ4XAJ2kvRKAv/MHBczmuDpzV259drKi+5SE=; b=dqtZzY2BxNpP6ZXv6U4KO3ycnaC/xcOv51aIC1qwXcWvmNOXCDrWlderrGOXInznUj R+tJ9ngrKgNAnTwOTn6Bqw6f8LM9jEpyVer+in4T2bdYHWDfroWRuaDh28XwsZEdh8Wh pqzVZTMLA/ud91jlcZqrpAk6bH0dnpmaLV1D6PG/I05n6wpoA07YXd3/SRxAqB0F6YSK FSSm9DHuE68vVftA0XK1S6m2geOp1RmajnT9ppIS2p8GOdTtJncu6LfXeDI/GrhUZYZT Oet6sCgmpqJgOmEwqIxKK7OQ+wrBpSjeHTz0zRR5NoISyOvMeMuu/+f3VsULlOPbeFGf VNvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=ggVjUb0zZ4XAJ2kvRKAv/MHBczmuDpzV259drKi+5SE=; b=PoYuXICJ949KwRR73XPCh5YPXIqgkVWQWKdaCG4XcmrcORILBQHXNbqSxhqvdDvgPO xLt6zOePzX7E5BNYWL3yRenehrRqTf4jYbh34LX1vJRsYTI9QxMGOCbtI3iV3gD76sz7 cepqCwA1KkK80yYHNi3ThriREIq22pChG6sd35VEIWBsB7GqLxGvRBgHq5rYif8XZw+l VZZm16kAKY0tQhpmk7stcQ3K0ugIPR9ly0h9qquZnkFg0avZ9QirXUApzZprGCtj2yLQ GTb9HQWxSPQc5yX9k2Bhm74Ya2PyhhE/0TTxY+q8rdKD5AYNqMvgf7HK0Hc9/s0BqmCQ PuYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT4dTALbq+x/dnIVPWmZeVf8VvUwv1ezy5kgzPqsOExKX4C2Sh0TDIb5Zeba7/jJx8W X-Received: by 10.28.232.194 with SMTP id f63mr11174604wmi.48.1455102999155; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 03:16:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y188sm2931432wmy.11.2016.02.10.03.16.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 03:16:38 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:15:12 +0100 Message-ID: <2971826.nUjO4v29cG@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] DPDK i40evf problem in receving packet X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:16:39 -0000 Formatting note: Please avoid top posting (inline replies are preferred), and do not include such disclaimer, not relevant on a mailing list. Thanks 2016-02-10 16:00, Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen: > Hi Saurabh, > Can you tell me what card you are uing > > > *Regards:* > Zain ul Abideen > > > *Disclaimer**: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments > is confidential; it is intended only for use of the individual or entity > named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, > you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or use of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication > in error, please delete it and email confirmation to the sender. Thank You.* > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Saurabh Mishra > wrote: > > > Hi Qian -- > > > > Any suggestions? This is bit urgent. > > > > /Saurabh > > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Saurabh Mishra > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Qian -- > > > > > > > > > Here's the data from Host: > > > > > > [root@oscompute3 ~]# ethtool -i p3p1 > > > > > > driver: i40e > > > > > > version: 1.0.11-k > > > > > > firmware-version: f4.40 a1.4 n04.53 e80001dc0 > > > > > > bus-info: 0000:04:00.0 > > > > > > supports-statistics: yes > > > > > > supports-test: yes > > > > > > supports-eeprom-access: yes > > > > > > supports-register-dump: yes > > > > > > supports-priv-flags: no > > > > > > [root@oscompute3 ~]# ethtool -i p3p2 > > > > > > driver: i40e > > > > > > version: 1.0.11-k > > > > > > firmware-version: f4.40 a1.4 n04.53 e80001dc0 > > > > > > bus-info: 0000:04:00.1 > > > > > > supports-statistics: yes > > > > > > supports-test: yes > > > > > > supports-eeprom-access: yes > > > > > > supports-register-dump: yes > > > > > > supports-priv-flags: no > > > > > > [root@oscompute3 ~]# > > > > > > EthApp> drvinfo > > > > > > Port 0 driver: rte_i40evf_pmd (ver: RTE 2.2.0) > > > > > > Port 1 driver: rte_i40evf_pmd (ver: RTE 2.2.0) > > > > > > EthApp> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Xu, Qian Q wrote: > > > > > >> What's your current firmware info, can u run ethtool -i port_interface > > to > > >> check? > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> Qian > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Mishra > > >> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 6:33 AM > > >> To: dev@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org > > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK i40evf problem in receving packet > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm seeing two problems: > > >> > > >> 1) when use our kernel '3.10.88-8.0.0.0.6', we only receive first > > >> packet but not subsequent ones at all after that. However, when I use > > >> centos7.0, then l2fwd is able to receive all the packets. > > >> > > >> 2) I've also seen that on centos7.0, symmetric_mp itself is not working. > > >> dev start fails with 280 error. > > >> > > >> i40evf is giving us lot of headache. The i40evf kernel driver works > > >> without any problem. Host is a centos7 KVM. I've already upgraded > > firmware > > >> to latest. > > >> > > >> [root@localhost ~]# uname -a > > >> > > >> Linux localhost.localdomain 3.10.0-327.4.5.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jan 25 > > >> 22:07:14 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > >> > > >> [root@localhost ~]# > > >> > > >> [root@localhost ~]# ./symmetric_mp fakeelf --file-prefix=virtaddr -c2 > > >> -m2048 -n1 --base-virtaddr=0x7fa000000000 --proc-type=primary -- -p 3 > > >> --num-procs=1 --proc-id=0 > > >> > > >> EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0 > > >> > > >> EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 0 on socket 0 > > >> > > >> EAL: Support maximum 128 logical core(s) by configuration. > > >> > > >> EAL: Detected 2 lcore(s) > > >> > > >> EAL: No free hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB > > >> > > >> EAL: VFIO modules not all loaded, skip VFIO support... > > >> > > >> EAL: Setting up physically contiguous memory... > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x2a800000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa000000000 (size = 0x2a800000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa02a800000 (size = 0x200000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x54000000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa02aa00000 (size = 0x54000000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x400000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa07ea00000 (size = 0x400000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa07ee00000 (size = 0x200000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa07f000000 (size = 0x200000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x600000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa07f200000 (size = 0x600000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa07f800000 (size = 0x200000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa07fa00000 (size = 0x200000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x400000 bytes > > >> > > >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7fa07fc00000 (size = 0x400000) > > >> > > >> EAL: Requesting 1024 pages of size 2MB from socket 0 > > >> > > >> EAL: TSC frequency is ~2600000 KHz > > >> > > >> EAL: WARNING: cpu flags constant_tsc=yes nonstop_tsc=no -> using > > >> unreliable clock cycles ! > > >> > > >> EAL: Master lcore 1 is ready (tid=3e55900;cpuset=[1]) > > >> > > >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:09.0 on NUMA socket -1 > > >> > > >> EAL: probe driver: 8086:154c rte_i40evf_pmd > > >> > > >> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7fa080000000 > > >> > > >> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7fa080010000 > > >> > > >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:0a.0 on NUMA socket -1 > > >> > > >> EAL: probe driver: 8086:154c rte_i40evf_pmd > > >> > > >> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7fa080014000 > > >> > > >> EAL: PCI memory mapped at 0x7fa080024000 > > >> > > >> # Initialising port 0... Queue :1 > > >> > > >> PMD: i40e_dev_rx_queue_setup(): Rx Burst Bulk Alloc Preconditions are > > >> satisfied. Rx Burst Bulk Alloc function will be used on port=0, queue=0. > > >> > > >> PMD: i40e_set_tx_function_flag(): Vector tx can be enabled on this txq. > > >> > > >> PMD: i40e_set_rx_function(): Port[0] doesn't meet Vector Rx > > preconditions > > >> > > >> PMD: i40e_set_rx_function(): Rx Burst Bulk Alloc Preconditions are > > >> satisfied. Rx Burst Bulk Alloc function will be used on port=0. > > >> > > >> PMD: i40e_set_tx_function(): Simple tx finally be used. > > >> > > >> smp_port_init() dev start error 280 > > >> > > >> EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 > > >> > > >> Cause: Error initialising ports > > >> > > >> [root@localhost ~]# > > >> > > > > > > > >