From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3331B4CD; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:43:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E252253D; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 06:43:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 06:43:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=AqGCgdf1zQA+YkTLsD0tNRGU8z+j4Jd8+/TtIPCG47w=; b=SpApTiXiygTj IHFttzCFAzY1TxI1qn9Cc4CwKjkNG5WL1w6SdTvhnLM87KOUItAdTYqIaSSg5Al1 XfNdk6pZGCzpPMrguqKvU1aGzSBu+I9jVgKBbKpvDb5IYFhJuTpcr9+wSZCrOPzj gHUR0uaIY/nB19T10YS9aZO4JohVtyw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=AqGCgdf1zQA+YkTLsD0tNRGU8z+j4Jd8+/TtIPCG4 7w=; b=WUU9wNsMyRFYP8B38iK8LgCtzvRvalfVYU5gVYun14cxxtI0PWxaiBXmk DEhm1yFal6GHkiNctHNb0S/h9QQSAlU5EBbKEhO88cNnTB4Z+Nh/zgxPoIOkR++B qj0WIOy6EfES9DPhpWLWhq8Il6JnSDT0wwgk5jOI1rhYxAcHzgPFeKQDiic+Psas sDl1fackMzkGUlGnqPREIcvDoC8ib/DQTCOmZzsv2AFU/W4UVrHQRYSDN+hWJT+m tauGBJknQ8Qlnec6iHn5bXcNGXZw7FSDGE6MgAUjEDWqQy6PvUehHkSadrTs4R57 R8yKgmUQp2n4R/jHQnrL2dndj0R0w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6BE74E421C; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 06:43:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Liang, Ma" Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Qian Xu , dpdk-dev , dpdk-test-report Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:43:13 +0200 Message-ID: <2975014.4ik6Sx9Qhf@xps> In-Reply-To: <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> References: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com> <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:43:11 -0000 You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script. 19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma: > Hi Thomas, > I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh. > that script still put '+' as the Section name. > any suggestion ? > I use fedora 24 and gawk > Regards > Liang > > On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit: > > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me. > > > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working. > > > > I have just restarted it. > > > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with > > the new check in checkpatches.sh. > > > > >