Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] lpm allocation fixes

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

2016-03-21 15:06, Christian Ehrhardt:
> Poking a bit on autotest revealed a few shortcomings in the lpm allocation path.
> Thanks to the feedback to the first revision of the patches here v2.
> Also Oliver Matz spotted similar issues and made me aware - thanks!
> Integrating them revealed even more use after free / leak issues.
> 
> *updates in v4*
> - re-removing the { } on single line ifs accidentially droped in v3
> - adding the ack of Oliver Matz
> 
> *updates in v3*
> - lpm create/free path for v20 and v1604 got the same fixes that were
>   already identified for lpm6 before
> 
> *updates in v2*
> - lpm/lpm6 patches split
> - following dpdk coding guidelines regarding single line if's
> - adding singed-off and acked-bys gathered so far
> - combine all three related patches in one series
> 
> Christian Ehrhardt (5):
>   lpm6: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm6_create
>   lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm
>   lpm: fix missing free of lpm
>   lpm: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm_create*
>   lpm: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm in rte_lpm_free*

Applied, thanks