From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4EE160
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:20:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41])
 by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Aug 2017 07:18:52 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,453,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="144113453"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.57])
 ([10.237.220.57])
 by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Aug 2017 07:18:48 -0700
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net, john.griffin@intel.com,
 fiona.trahe@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
References: <20170831134244.35215-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
 <20170831134244.35215-4-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <298d123d-2d55-c702-cc14-6dab9eff9ebd@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:18:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170831134244.35215-4-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] ether: rename version file to match
 library name
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:20:53 -0000

On 8/31/2017 2:42 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> While almost all libraries have the library name match the directory name,
> some libraries and drivers do not. For those that don't, some have the
> version filename use the libname, e.g. null_crypto, others have it use the
> directory name, e.g. ether. Using the library name seems the better
> standard to follow, so rename rte_ether_version.map to
> rte_ethdev_version.map.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ether/Makefile                                          | 2 +-
>  lib/librte_ether/{rte_ether_version.map => rte_ethdev_version.map} | 0
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  rename lib/librte_ether/{rte_ether_version.map => rte_ethdev_version.map} (100%)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/Makefile b/lib/librte_ether/Makefile
> index db692ae4d..27d9766a8 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/Makefile
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ LIB = librte_ethdev.a
>  CFLAGS += -O3
>  CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS)
>  
> -EXPORT_MAP := rte_ether_version.map
> +EXPORT_MAP := rte_ethdev_version.map

Why library name and folder name is different for ethdev, will it break
anything if folder also renamed to librte_ethdev? for consistency.

>  
>  LIBABIVER := 6
>  
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map
> similarity index 100%
> rename from lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> rename to lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev_version.map
>